• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Apologies, could you evaluate this please?

Hey can you ping supporter @Celestial_Pegasus and other staffs please. The crt is 7 months old 🙏
Hello, sorry if I'm (not?) bothering but can you please evaluate this thread please ? (If you have time for this, of course.)

Could you take a look at this?
Could you take a look at this?
Can you take a look at here?
incon decided by both parties need vote
Hi mate. Will be you able to make an input here? It is a pretty important thread with Concept 1 and Information 2 haxes (among many others). Thank you!

Can you take a look at this?
Hello can you take a look at this?
Hey Vietthai can you check out this crt please. Its the shortest one I've made 🙏
Mind reviewing this?
Hello, would it be possible for you to evaluate this CRT? Thank you for your time.
Hello, would it be possible for you to evaluate this CRT? Thank you for your time.
Hello, would it be possible for you to evaluate this CRT? Thank you for your time.
Hello, would it be possible for you to evaluate this CRT? Thank you for your time.
Hello, would it be possible for you to evaluate this CRT? Thank you for your time.
Hello, would it be possible for you to evaluate this CRT? Thank you for your time.
Hello, would it be possible for you to evaluate this CRT? Thank you for your time.
hello planck, wouild you mind checking out this crt? viett gave his opinion needs 1 more vote

Howdy! Could I have permission to comment here? I have some stuff to bring up regarding small size universes and whether or not they'd be included
Planck69
Planck69
You can make one post.
Are you able to check my crt?

Hello would you mind checking this crt? Viett gave his opinion already.
Can you review this CRT?


I generally avoid threads like this, but my fellow supporters leaves things out like Quantum Timelocks.

From Fate Extella Mats. https://www.tmdict.com/en/ku.quantum-timelock

“ Spiritron record anchoring band[1].
A Quantum Timelock is a metaphysical event, it calculates the average “value” of each parallel world’s events, then locks past events down. A phenomenon that separates what was, and is, from what might be.
Our universe allows for countless possibilities and creates many parallels worlds and histories with different developments.
The universe has a finite amount of energy to spend maintaining each parallel world. Because the universe itself would expire if these realities were to expand without limit, it conserves energy by, excising worlds, at specific intervals, that have veered too far from the strongest, most stable timelines.
The Moon Cell has concluded that the universe we perceive of, which should be unstable, is being stabilized across the present, past, and future by this culling process and by quantum time locks.
The easiest way to visualize the process is to envision time as a giant tree, one that would grow indefinitely if left alone. The excision process is comparable to trimming the unneeded branches and leaving only the trunk of that tree.
History that becomes a part of the “time lock”2 will not change, even if it is affected by the past and future. The incidents that occur during a time lock will, in fact, never change, no matter what happens.
Even if one were to go back in time before the time lock to try and change history, once one reached the time lock, history would be forcefully restored to what was already registered there.
In a universe with quantum time locks, the outcome that is registered in an quantum time lock will not change. A time traveler can only alter the “process” by which it happens, but never the “result.”
For example, imagine that there was a war in Britain, and that the “result” that was locked in afterwards was that Britain was destroyed.
Even if you could manage to travel back in time and affect history so that Britain flourished, the war ended peacefully, and everyone had a happy ending… the moment that history reached the time lock, it would cause whatever “corrections” were necessary to ensure that, despite your efforts, Britain was still destroyed.
You might be able to change the lives of one, two, or perhaps even a handful of people, but you could not change the course of the vast river of human history.
That is the “Quantum Time Lock,” also known as the “Foundation of Human Order” in the world of magecraft.
On the other hand, it could be possible to deny human history from its foundations by destroying a quantum time lock through some great feat. But even with that method the most that could be done is deny human history beyond the destroyed quantum time lock.”

Also a quote from Da Vinci in FGO Lostbelt 3


“The Pruning Theoretical Phenomenon isn't driven by
malice or error. It just...happens.
ダ・ヴィンチ
Da Vinci
私たちだって、どんなに理想を信じて
懸命に戦い続けようと…… We're not immune, either. No matter how hard we
fight for what we believe in...
ダ・ヴィンチ
Da Vinci
気がつけば『汎人類史』と呼びうる分岐がどこか余所に
生じて、我々は置き去りにされているかもしれない。 ...there's always a chance some other branch more
worthy of being called Proper Human History could
leave us behind.”



https://apps.atlasacademy.io/db/JP/script/0300032041?compareSource=rayshift

We have to seriously consider the ramifications if these realms are supposedly 1A and all.
HammerStrikes219
HammerStrikes219
Also, I not sure how I feel about the excessive and long drawn out interpretation of the evidence provided as I must point out that they are claiming 1A or higher.

I don’t get why you claiming High 1A as the evidence is being drowned by the excessive overly complicated explanation to explain why these realms are supposedly 1A or higher as you are suggesting.


At this point, I rather have all the evidence in more compacted format than these excessive long drawn explanations/interpretations from my fellow Nasuverse supporters here.


A remake for the thread seems appropriate and keep in mind, I actually have some serious doubts on these interpretations my fellow Nasuverse supporters put out since they are too philosophical filler stuff that drowns out the context and evidence that provides that context as well
Ultima_Reality
Ultima_Reality
I'm taking what was told to me at face value for the moment. Whether it's actually true going by the evidence is another matter.
HammerStrikes219
HammerStrikes219
Fair enough and it is a massive thread to say the least
Back
Top