• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

What's new Featured content New posts New media New media comments New profile posts Latest activity
Napoleondevious
Hello
you seem to disagree with the current tiering (1-A particularly), is there a thread where you discussed and argued on why ? i just want to see your point of view on the tiering system.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
On tiering in general? No, I've never made a thread to discuss that, and I almost certainly never will.

My thought process is simple. It is entirely arbitrary. All of the tiering system past a point is based on mutual agreement as to what constitutes greater powers- the real science community has no consensus on these things, and we are hardly scientists. We simplify the concepts explored by the brightest minds in the world down to something the average 20-something can understand without getting bored and hamfist it to something workable by our standards. None of it is real. R>F is only a philosophy, a consideration applied to something that isn't real. It's just as valid as the next thing, we have a system derived from the musings of one or two people who thought about it for a long time.

I don't think tier 1 exists, and if it does, we may be the least qualified people in the world to decipher it. "We" as in, the royal we, all powerscalers. Still. People want the higher numbers, eh? So, we have it. It is what it is.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
To answer a question I foresee as plausibly forthcoming. "Why don't you make a thread?"

I don't like arguing, really. It's sort of counter-productive, to have that trait on a wiki dedicated to arguing, but I have been fortunate enough to be recognized as reliable, so I don't need to argue to have a say. I really am fairly non-confrontational, I rarely make threads myself to pursue things. I say what I think and sometimes people agree. I don't habitually debate, my interest is not in arguing, least of all something so unlikely to succeed. The end truth of the matter is that most users really like Tier 1. It would be an insanely unpopular move to remove it. Most people would convince themselves we're wrong, anyway. So, I am content to just let others handle it.
Rikimarox2
Hello! Can you check this QnA thread later? Don't worry, I won't trick you as last time. There's no xianxia or anime shenanigans.

It's just a simple QnA thread talking about whether we can use blogs that are made in other sites/apps, like Notion.
Quangotjokes
Hey Bambu, it’s been a while. A few years back you helped me with a crt to upgrade an obscure verse Adventure quest. I never got around to making the profiles for the Dhe Ehm (You concluded they were tier 1 but not bound to the realities of the game itself) but given how much has changed in the tiering system I figured I’d ask if you’d be interested in taking a look at another upgrade with more information and context. I’ll link it Here.

Thank you again for the assistance, hope all is well 🙏🏽
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Hi. I don't remember you in particular, but the "Dhe Ehm" phrase rings a bell. I actively avoid Tier 1 discussions these days (I did back then as well, but may have made an exception). I hope you get the eyes on it you want. Good luck.
Quangotjokes
Quangotjokes
No worries, and thank you. I completely understand lol
Huesito88
I have a Q and A thread with a Question regarding first if one part of this feat can be calculated (and if so how?), and if not then can the second part use some known variables from in real life stuff? I'm wondering if you can help with an answer, thank you

The thread
Jerry59
I mean I know you're probably still not interested in evaluating calcs. but hey check this out
(might change the LS thing by assuming Sisyphus jumps vertically if we can't use that kind of angle)
vsbattles.fandom.com

ULTRAKILL - Jumpin

vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
DMUA
DMUA
"I know you don't want to evaluate calcs but evaluate this calc actually"

You are graced by the fortune that I've thought about my low activity recently and decided to slightly turn around, and thus nullifies thy curse of Yu-Gi-Oh player
Dark_Soul20189
If you have some free time, would you be willing to check this CRT out?

Or more specifically if this scan is enough for a likely fire manipulation or not since it's currently tied if it should be fully removed or be changed to just "likely" or "possibly". (Mind manipulation, has already been accepted for removal)

Here is the scan in question


I thank you in advance if you decide to help, and either way, I wish you a great day.
Back
Top