• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

(I'm very sorry that I've edited CC Goku and other DBH characters before, cuz I was unaware that it has actually a Thread dedicated to it, I thought it was for fun.. I'm sorry that I edited without anyone's permission)

Anyways, well .. I do have a question.. when will you refute the concept hax for SDBH, because I've observed that in the Misfit of the Demon King tyranny thread, they are clowning Xeno Goku that he can't beat anyone in the silver sea cuz of AE 1, after the Low 1-C upgrade for the Misfit Verse?
Vietthai96
Vietthai96
Idrc much about who beat who, there is a lot if verse that can beat DB, adding one more verse isn't going to be something ridiculous
Shar122
Shar122
Yeah fair enough, I'm just waiting for 1-A DBH ig.
Shar122
Shar122
It just suck that they remove the concept hax
Hi Damage, I think it's easy to evaluate, could you give some feedback on this CRT?
Hi Damage, I had a question


Wiki Acceptance wise, is this calc's mass part still valid for use?
I heard you were active around the time this was used I think you might have an idea
(If it's mass is not accepted I would love it if you could point to one that is accepted)
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
Hi, I'm sorry to be here again.
Last time, I asked you about Non-Physical Interaction, and you mentioned something about the soul being able to be proven as physical. I'm just curious: if a soul is pressed or crushed by an object, such as a building, that clearly has no form of NPI, could this be considered proof that the soul is physical?

And on the NPI page, the description mentions that interacting with fire is also considered NPI. I wonder if this means that a character who has fire manipulation would be considered to have NPI.
Detective_Blizzard
Detective_Blizzard
Not the guy you asked, but this would be better asked in Questions and Answers.

Personally have no answer about the building thing, but no a character with Fire Manipulation wouldn't have NPI as they just have Fire Manipulation. There are many applications of the ability and they'd need to do something like physically grab the element or something similar to have NPI as opposed to simply generating/controlling flames via an ability.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Fire manipulation is not NPI- it is a particular thing one can control, it doesn't extend to the broad spectrum of things like fire.

As for the soul thing, speaking in hypotheticals is difficult because every situation will be different. But if it were consistently displayed to have situations like that, then yeah, it probably wouldn't be considered non-physical.
Chris_only9271
Chris_only9271
Thank you for your helpful response.🙏
Hello, apologies for what I'm about to ask but it is a high priority for the verse I've been revising. I have a CRT that needs a staff's approval, problem is that me and another user have been going back and forth on it causing it to be very bloated in the comments for it which means staff are far less likely to actually do anything with it.

A staff member has already and approved it, with me and all of the active knowledgeable members agreeing with the composite (with it also practically being the current versions of the profiles anyway). Other revisions are effectively locked up until this is resolved, hence why I am asking for assistance as there is half a century worth of content needed to be gone over and a delay like this isn't helping.
Hi, Mav. Can you please copy-paste the code from this sandbox of mine into this blog and replace all the info there? I did some grammar corrections, added more references, etc. If you wonder, yes, I worked with Arceus0X on this project.
Could you evaluate this CRT when you get the chance please and thank you.
Heya! I witnessed one of your message on the official translation request thread and I wondered if I could get permission to quote you in a CRT in a near-future?
Heya! Sorry to bother you, but could you come here whenever you have a couple of minutes? Thank you in advance!

Could you please comment on this thread?
Could you please comment on this thread?
Could you please comment on this thread?
Could you please comment on this thread?
Could you please comment on this thread?

Hello Clover, I want to talk to you about something. My friend said I should put this cals on the Black Clover verse page right now. I understand that you want to change everything after Black Clover ends, but my friend said to prevent confusion for those who don't. Follow this verse (even if you already wrote notes lol) and you also checked my class. What do you think?
CloverDragon03
CloverDragon03
I don't think it's necessary at the moment. The calc is accepted, yes, but we're avoiding any updates until Black Clover ends
Hey, sorry to bother. This CRT really needs to be approved for revisions of the verse to continue, it doesn't change anything in the verse itself and primarily there so that there isn't massive walls of back and forth between me and another user which derail every revision. Another staff member has already looked over the frankly overblown back and forth on this one and approved of compositing the highly episodic verse.
Back
Top