• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Posting this here as not to clutter up the tier 1/0 review thread.
you said in your recent post narrative justification wasn't needed i think the rules on https://fcoc-vs-battles.fandom.com/wiki/Tier_1_Page_Rules
  1. Narrative Justification: Perhaps the most crucial rule is the inclusion of a narrative justification for why the character and/or cosmology hold a specific tier level. The character's powers and placement within the tiering system should align with the story being told, maintaining coherence and logical progression.
the wording on this maybe should be changed, I know it mostly refers to characters but I can see how the wording could be confusing to new users cause as it reads to me that narrative justification for my cosmology blog would be paramount.

If this is the wrong place to post this I am sorry! I dont use discord for power scaling stuff and didnt want to clutter the thread and didnt feel this required a thread itself. If you feel this is just being nit picky feel free to ignore this. Just somthing that popped out to me.
Phoenks
Phoenks
That's in the requirements to have something accepted. It has nothing to do with that being present on the cosmology blog itself.

You must have misunderstood my post.
Hello! If you have time, can you check this out?
Hello, this thread is applying an accepted thread's conclusion that you voted prior, can you give input here for this topic to conclude?
Hello! If you have time, can you check this out?
Please.
Hey,

I was wondering if you have time or if you are able to, could you look at this thread and assess what would be the best calc for this feat please?

Thank you

Could you check this CRT? I only need two more votes, and I been bump this for 1 month already. Please
Hey, could you check my CRT for Fate? It been a month already, and I only need 2 more staffs votes
Can you check this CRT please? (This is straightforward and I need one more staff opinion)
Are you an expert on this?
DemonicDude
DemonicDude
I don't know if I specifically know about this or not but I decided to record the video of this feat for you and pasted it my own opinions regarding the situation on that post that you just linked me. I hope it helps in anyway. Thanks for informing me about this mannnnnn
(I'm very sorry that I've edited CC Goku and other DBH characters before, cuz I was unaware that it has actually a Thread dedicated to it, I thought it was for fun.. I'm sorry that I edited without anyone's permission)

Anyways, well .. I do have a question.. when will you refute the concept hax for SDBH, because I've observed that in the Misfit of the Demon King tyranny thread, they are clowning Xeno Goku that he can't beat anyone in the silver sea cuz of AE 1, after the Low 1-C upgrade for the Misfit Verse?
Vietthai96
Vietthai96
Idrc much about who beat who, there is a lot if verse that can beat DB, adding one more verse isn't going to be something ridiculous
Shar122
Shar122
Yeah fair enough, I'm just waiting for 1-A DBH ig.
Shar122
Shar122
It just suck that they remove the concept hax
Hi Damage, I think it's easy to evaluate, could you give some feedback on this CRT?
Hi Damage, I had a question


Wiki Acceptance wise, is this calc's mass part still valid for use?
I heard you were active around the time this was used I think you might have an idea
(If it's mass is not accepted I would love it if you could point to one that is accepted)
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
When you have a moment could you evaluate this CRT?


Thank you!
Hi, I'm sorry to be here again.
Last time, I asked you about Non-Physical Interaction, and you mentioned something about the soul being able to be proven as physical. I'm just curious: if a soul is pressed or crushed by an object, such as a building, that clearly has no form of NPI, could this be considered proof that the soul is physical?

And on the NPI page, the description mentions that interacting with fire is also considered NPI. I wonder if this means that a character who has fire manipulation would be considered to have NPI.
Detective_Blizzard
Detective_Blizzard
Not the guy you asked, but this would be better asked in Questions and Answers.

Personally have no answer about the building thing, but no a character with Fire Manipulation wouldn't have NPI as they just have Fire Manipulation. There are many applications of the ability and they'd need to do something like physically grab the element or something similar to have NPI as opposed to simply generating/controlling flames via an ability.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Fire manipulation is not NPI- it is a particular thing one can control, it doesn't extend to the broad spectrum of things like fire.

As for the soul thing, speaking in hypotheticals is difficult because every situation will be different. But if it were consistently displayed to have situations like that, then yeah, it probably wouldn't be considered non-physical.
Chris_only9271
Chris_only9271
Thank you for your helpful response.🙏
Hello, apologies for what I'm about to ask but it is a high priority for the verse I've been revising. I have a CRT that needs a staff's approval, problem is that me and another user have been going back and forth on it causing it to be very bloated in the comments for it which means staff are far less likely to actually do anything with it.

A staff member has already and approved it, with me and all of the active knowledgeable members agreeing with the composite (with it also practically being the current versions of the profiles anyway). Other revisions are effectively locked up until this is resolved, hence why I am asking for assistance as there is half a century worth of content needed to be gone over and a delay like this isn't helping.
Hi, Mav. Can you please copy-paste the code from this sandbox of mine into this blog and replace all the info there? I did some grammar corrections, added more references, etc. If you wonder, yes, I worked with Arceus0X on this project.
Back
Top