New profile posts

Can I get your evaluation on this calc?
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:LegendariumOfLies/Berserk:_Recalcing_The_Dragon_Slayer

Could I have your input on this calc

how do I make destroying an infinite amount of timelines that all branch from one original timeline, a 2-A feat?

I’ve seen people say branching timelines aka MWI don’t reach above Low 2-C but also arguments against this statement.

Hello
Could you please check this calc?

Hello
Can I get your input ? Thank's

Hello, if you don't mind, could you check this CRT when you have time? Thanks in advance

Could you comment on this, please?

Dear Theglassman12, I have a question.

If someone is stated to be "immutable to changes", that they can deny unwanted changes as a result and therefore no attack or anything can do something to them, would that be Acausality Type 5? If is a problem if it's a "state" they need to activate/They can deactivate it too?

Hello, would you be able to take a look at this and provide an evaluation?
Thank you!

Hello, would you be able to take a look at this and provide an evaluation?
Thank you!

Hello
Can you please give your input on this thread only more one staff needed

Hello, Ultima, I have a rather simple question.

We know that 2-C or 2-B > Low 2-C[timeline/universe], inasmuch as that 2-C or 2-B are basically multiple amount of Low 2-C constructs.
However, the same doesn't apply to 2-A, insofar as that "multiple sets of infinite universes" are still 2-A [according to the FAQ] because countable infinity x countable infinity still results in, well, countable infinity.

However, which one of this methods apply to Low 1-C?
If we take Low 1-C as a Hyper-timeline, then multiple of said Hypertimelines should still be bigger in size then a single Hyper-timeline, the same way a normal set of more than one 4D timelines is bigger in size then a single 4D timeline, right?
Or are we gonna assume the 2-A mechanic here and say that multiple Low 1-C constructs [where each construct is X-size] are still equivalent to a single Low 1-C construct [of X-size], even if each of the Low 1-C constructs is causally[as a space-time] isolated from each other?

Hello
Sorry to disturb you, can you please give your input on this thread only one more staff needed

Could you please check this calculation?

Could you please check this calculation?

Could you please check this calculation?

need you here

Very need you here

need you here

You might be interested in this.

Mr. Bambu have you played Fromsoftware games?. just curious to know.

Howdy! Could you check this revision out please? It's fairly straightforward.

When you get the chance could you check this out?

Know ur tackling the Touhou verse rn but when you get the chance could you check this out?

Howdy! I wanted to apologize for distressing you in that Hunter thread a few days ago. That was not my intention but I am sorry I upset you regardless

Hi Wokistan, if you have the time could you please look over these calcs?

Mind looking at this: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:AceOfSpaces3709/Bear_Thief_Swings_His_Sword

Mind looking at this: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:AceOfSpaces3709/Bear_Thief_Swings_His_Sword

Mind looking at this: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:AceOfSpaces3709/Bear_Thief_Swings_His_Sword

Mind looking at this: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:AceOfSpaces3709/Bear_Thief_Swings_His_Sword

Mind looking at this: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:AceOfSpaces3709/Bear_Thief_Swings_His_Sword

Are two votes enough from the administrators to make a thread accepted?

It's been a while.

I notice in a post you made last week you said, "I was willing to leave this wiki behind, considering recent events", but I haven't been active for years, and I was curious. What kind of events were you referring to?

Sorry to drag you back to this. But i made a post summarising the arguments and wondering if you could give your thoughts on the questions at hand? Just so we can speed the thread up, thanks in advance

Sorry to drag you back to this. But i made a post summarising the arguments and wondering if you could give your thoughts on the questions at hand? Just so we can speed the thread up, thanks in advance

Sorry to drag you back to this. But i made a post summarising the arguments and wondering if you could give your thoughts on the questions at hand? Just so we can speed the thread up, thanks in advance

Hello, I hope you don't mind checking out this CRT

Hi! If you have time, can you check this out?

What do you Think of this 3 staffs agreed to this

the reasons for closing the thread?