• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Heya! Could you perhaps check this thread? Thank you!

Hello! How are you? Sorry to bother you again, but when you have a chance, could you please evaluate these two weightlifting calculations? (These are very simple calculations and I used other accepted calculations as a basis).

Welp, it seems it begins again.
Hello. Can you check this thread pls
Hello! If you have time, can you check this out?
Hi. If you have time can you check this calcs please. (about first calc the action takes place somewhere under the subway or in abandoned metro areas. So I think reinforced concrete should be okay)
Wassup! Since you're a Spawn supporters, I think you should take a look at this versus thread and maybe provide your opinion.
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
I'm not all that interested in versus matches generally tbh
AThe1412
AThe1412
Oh, that's alright. I just thought I should inform you about it. Apologies for bothering you if I did.
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
Nah it's fine, I'm just not really in the mood for it nowadays... plus I don't find the opponent too interesting either

There is no distinction between past, present, and future for Altana,for her all them are one , so she would not have linear time she would reside in a state where all events are always happening simultaneously and she is always present ,she would be an eternal now

Am i right would she be acausality type 5 and an eternal now?
Grabbing_dragon
Grabbing_dragon
I just need a yes or no past, present, and future are all the same to her and she is always present
Ultima_Reality
Grabbing_dragon
Grabbing_dragon
Ok thanks i guess it needs to get called eternal now
If you don't mind me discussing it here, what do you still disagree on in this post? I've shown that parallelism is completely unnecessary headcanon and that they haven't even proven that the RBR or by extension the Yggdrasil would extend in any significant extent along the 5th dimensional axis.
Hello, if you don't mind, could you check any of these two calcs when you have time? Thanks in advance
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
Left some comments
  • Like
Reactions: RoTt35
RoTt35
RoTt35
Thanks for your evaluation, the second method of the first calc shouldn't count as calc stacking, right? Since the yield of the shockwave that Jean tanked is what's being calculated
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
Yeah I was mostly referring to the first method, forgot to specify
  • Like
Reactions: RoTt35
Hi I made a blog post to hopefully make following a series much easier to follow and clear up misconceptions, any help would be much appreciated
You can also give the final vote of this one it’s still open

Hello, all links are replaced now, so I need your evaluation here to finally apply it, please
Hey, your opinion would be appreciated.

Your opinion

your opinion

That neither proves anything, or stops someone from shilling his work to the point that it becomes popular enough to become eligible.
The bar gets changed from "Lie" to "Lie, and be a good enough artist to get a million views". There's many people who could do the former but not the latter.
Besides, why 1 millon views, that seems rather arbitrary
Yeah, can you think of a non-arbitrary number for that?
Livinmeme
Livinmeme
The bar gets changed from "Lie" to "Lie, and be a good enough artist to get a million views". There's many people who could do the former but not the latter.
Popularity shouldn't be used as an evidence of quality, otherwise it could just derail into cattle logic "it is popular, so that means it should be good"
Yeah, can you think of a non-arbitrary number for that?
Technically any number really, one millon is not more special than...Let say...100K. And even that depends on the medium. It justs seems...Random, and it ignores potential context that could harm the verse crediability (like becoming popular because some random grifter E-celeb made a video about it)
Anyways, I also want to add that the rule doesn't even make much sense, considering a good chunk of verses are either
A. Too weak to be written using powerscaling logic (Unless it is like worms, where it focuses more on the logical side, instead of the "disgaea" part"
B. Too old
Making a rule that has such absurd popularity threshold not only harms the verses that can get in, but also the types of verses that can get in (due to them being too niche to become popular), because we are assuming on the absurdly small chance that the author could be a powerscaler (most of the time just doing a quick read of the novel is far far more reliable than relying on popularity)
Hello there. Would you please provide your input on this refutation of one of the justifications for tier 1 God of War? In short, the argument is that while this Low 1-C justification is based off of the assumption that the Nine Realms in God of War are geometrically "parallel" based off of a generalization of the definition of "parallel" to higher dimensions, there actually is no evidence of this or reason to go by this assumption whatsoever. To put it in even less words, one of the central premises of their argument is completely ungrounded. If you wish, you could also hold off on giving your input until other members give counterarguments.
Ultima_Reality
Ultima_Reality
Alright.
TyphonEX
TyphonEX
But really quick, do you think that spatially finite realms that extend infinitely temporally have to be parallel in the sense that there is no path between them via 3D movement? That seems to be one of the main points of contention. My assertion is that they do NOT have to be parallel in that sense and thus do not need an extra dimension to be embedded in. Kind of like this. Their extensions through the time dimension are parallel, but they are not fully parallel since it is in fact possible to travel from one realm to another via their dimensional axes, which I called spatial component 1 and spatial component 2 in the diagram. Of course, this is only possible for realms that are finite in at least one of their dimensions. Meanwhile the others in the thread claim otherwise and claim that other staff members have already established that.
TyphonEX
TyphonEX
Also, both sides have made arguments in the thread now. What do you think?
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
Left a comment
ByArrow
ByArrow
Thank you for your comment. But I think you have misunderstood what the calculation is calculating. This calculation calc Sherlock's first punch that pierced the coffin, not the destruction of the entire coffin. So the total energy is the energy of Sherlock's punch that pierced the coffin , not the energy of the complete destruction of the coffin. So there is no need to divide it.
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
Corrected my oopsie.
Back
Top