New profile posts

No to say, all this stuffs like "Worlds within world" "A universe is a multiverses to all of other universe of possibilities" "Omniverse" "A lager thought is contained by another larger thought" is more of the same idea but explained in different tone.

Every writers including him adopted this idea into their works. Dematteis works specifically explained this R>F Hierarchy of Universes in more detail, like this phrase "World within world" which was used by every writers.

Even without Dematteis, the scale of Main cosmology will still remain the same. Like I said above, the Main cosmology still has the its own of infinite universe contained by universe which in turn contained by multiverse. To understand what im saying, The Superflow encompassed the Earth-616 and other alternates universes, all of choices maked in universes like Earth-616 would result in branching out Earth-616-1, Earth-616-2 and infinite which Earth-616 encompasses them. Then in turn Earth-616-1 can also branch another infinite universe of possibilities and this go on infinitly just like this statement. So no in my point of view.

"As above, so below"

Click to expand...

• First, If there is a infinite R>F transcendence in this case reality and dream. Will the tier change if the hierarchy go up or down? I am wondering since i think it is just a perspective.
• Second, The size of the R>F should be irrelevant right? Since the argument is being made that a "dream" is comparable in size to "reality" is a anti-feat for the R>F.