• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

What's new New posts New media New media comments New profile posts Latest activity
God243
Are you good about abstract existence type 2?
View previous comments…
Deagonx
Deagonx
What would have Abstract Existence due to this? If I am understanding this correctly, they just use the abstract information in humanity's collective consciousness as a blueprint to create things. However, the physical instances created by the cube wouldn't have AE-2 nor would they be thought of as "avatars" of an abstraction. Based on what this says, the only thing that actually has abstract existence is the blueprint itself, which shouldn't be relevant for tiering.
God243
God243
Thx man👍once again forgive me
if I'm boring you for It i don't know man, I was against this abstract existence type 2 but everyone was against me for hate(maybe) not admins thx god only one was.
the thread is dead and it's only been a week so I don't know do you want to give your opinion?
these informations and data can cause an illness to shipgirl and can only be cured by fixing this data and informations "i think" i am based on what Viet said.
It Is all you need to know.
The reality lens Is powered up by wisdom cube
1)
2)
3)
If all this does a big no for abstract existence type 2 gg for me dont worry i'll delete the wall
Deagonx
Deagonx
Who has AE type 2 for this What character?
Knowzn
Hello, if you can, input on these two calculations would be appreciated. Thank you.
Knowzn
Knowzn
Thank you for the evaluation. Should I take it you're not interested in the other one?
Killerdrone123
Hi your opinion on this would be very helpful

vsbattles.com

Spaces in Times Dragon Ball revision

Continuation of this thread, will make the arguments very clear now with a voting poll from the beginning, full disclosure though, if this becomes as much of a mess and flood and the last thread i will ask for this to be closed and make a staff thread instead, clear? ok, so for the thread itself...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Tanin_iver
The question is relevant to the thread at hand. You do not have to close the thread. They can easily respond to it. Its generally hard to get a grasp on them in DMs or in a FAQ thread. I already pinged them in multiple FAQ threads but to no avail. I hope u understand that it is not that difficult for you to keep the thread open a bit longer to get my responses.

I am already pressed for time and can barely manage to get some time to respond here.
View previous comments…
Deagonx
Deagonx
Idk why u have such a problem with me asking questions
Click to expand...
They are both constantly inundated with questions, the point was to simplify the discussion in such a way that they could clear up any remaining ambiguity that you were holding on to in one fell swoop. If you wanted certain questions added, you should have specified that beforehand.

U simply close threads without having any sort of conclusion by any of the staff. U just need votes as an excuse to rush and close threads.
Click to expand...
Does "rushing" just mean any closure before you personally are satisfied? It was over two weeks and 9 pages, with 8 staff members voting, none of whom agreed with adding a spatial axis. These are clearly just sour grapes because the upgrade failed and you're looking for an excuse, you want to blame it on me instead of a bad argument.

Ik what it means. You know I was right about that so u stopped arguing about it.
Click to expand...
"Knowing" someone was right does not mean you've conceded, the definition of the word concede means you actually admit that. Further, you are not a psychic. Don't make false claims of me "conceding" because you've imagined in your mind that I "knew you were right about it" and that was the reason that I stopped arguing. I stopped arguing because it was clear you would not listen to what I was saying, and I thought the disagreement could be resolved by showing you that the FAQ's authors agreed with me, which they did. You were wrong about the FAQ, I did not "concede" nor was I persuaded by your arguments.
Tanin_iver
Tanin_iver
They are both constantly inundated with questions, the point was to simplify the discussion in such a way that they could clear up any remaining ambiguity that you were holding on to in one fell swoop. If you wanted certain questions added, you should have specified that beforehand.
Click to expand...
That doesn't mean that I am not free to ask them, just because they are inundated with questions.
Did u specify beforehand that u will ping them to the thread and ask me if I have any more questions or anything to add extra to something new that they might come up with?
Does "rushing" just mean any closure before you personally are satisfied? It was over two weeks and 9 pages, with 8 staff members voting, none of whom agreed with adding a spatial axis. These are clearly just sour grapes because the upgrade failed and you're looking for an excuse, you want to blame it on me instead of a bad argument.
Click to expand...
Its weird and ironic that u keep bringing up votes but u urself refused a thread closure when u were losing a thread by 2x vote lead. Also no, not about personal satisfaction, its a discussion, so a conclusion with some consensus rather than just votes is what I would expect. The length and number of pages is irrelevant a discussion can finish in a few posts or take months or multiple pages. We don't have any specific rules regarding some threshold.
"Knowing" someone was right does not mean you've conceded, the definition of the word concede means you actually admit that.
Click to expand...
Yeah, Ik that. It is against your character to admit it. All u did was changed stances. That's enough to conclude.
Further, you are not a psychic. Don't make false claims of me "conceding" because you've imagined in your mind that I "knew you were right about it" and that was the reason that I stopped arguing. I stopped arguing because it was clear you would not listen to what I was saying, and I thought the disagreement could be resolved by showing you that the FAQ's authors agreed with me, which they did.
Click to expand...
They literally did not agree with the specific quote of the FAQ that u were arguing and brought up a different thing entirely.
Also, you are not a psychic either, that u just concluded that I was going to say the FAQ is wrong, the authors are wrong, I will argue with them, I wont concede
Deagonx
Deagonx
That doesn't mean that I am not free to ask them,
Click to expand...
Of course, but you wanting to ask them questions doesn't mean that I am not free to close the thread, which was universally rejected.

Its weird and ironic that u keep bringing up votes but u urself refused a thread closure when u were losing a thread by 2x vote lead
Click to expand...
Big difference between being 0-8 and being 5-8, and big difference between closing a thread after two days and two weeks.

It is against your character to admit it. All u did was changed stances. That's enough to conclude.
Click to expand...
I am currently informing you that I didn't change stances. I also didn't give you any indication that I had changed stances. I said:

I feel largely that we are getting nowhere, and that there is little to nothing that I could say that would effectively demonstrate to you that you have read the FAQ wrong and are advocating for Low 1-C on a basis that we explicitly reject as a wiki. I'm not content to go in circles here, if I feel that you are simply beyond convincing I will spend my time in better ways.

Somehow you interpreted this to mean "I think you're right so I'll stop arguing because my stance has changed."

Also, you are not a psychic either, that u just concluded that I was going to say the FAQ is wrong, the authors are wrong, I will argue with them, I wont concede
Click to expand...
I asked if you would, I did not merely assume it. You responded:
And since we are discussing this with regards to the FAQ on what they mean by their wordings specifically, well they are the ones who have written it so their interpretation is absolute.

DT responded:
Just containing multiple 4D structures just makes you multiverse-sized. And being called infinite in no way means being infinite in terms of a 5D axis. Anything containing an infinite universe is infinite. That we have the difference between countably infinite and uncountably infinite as the difference between dimensional levels (as, amongst others, explained in the multiverse example) is just the cherry on top.

This is very clear.
omegabronic
Hello, can you give input in this thread? points and counter points from both sides were given, since you participated in the last threads about it, it must interest you i think
Could you sign off on this?
vsbattles.com

Stargate Ha'tak revision

Stargate deserves more love. To that end I'm going to give itself a whole verse for it. Starting with the ha'tak. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:TheAngryOrange/StargateSandbox I also seek to add the jaffa. The kull warriors and replicators beneath them are still in the works so...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
LuffyRuffy46307
Ultima, good morning!

vsbattles.com

Spaces in Times Dragon Ball revision

Continuation of this thread, will make the arguments very clear now with a voting poll from the beginning, full disclosure though, if this becomes as much of a mess and flood and the last thread i will ask for this to be closed and make a staff thread instead, clear? ok, so for the thread itself...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com

Well, in this crt it's talking about dimensional barriers, if you could take the time to help us I would appreciate it, if you could look at the counter arguments that would be good too
LuffyRuffy46307
Could you take a look at the crt?

vsbattles.com

Spaces in Times Dragon Ball revision

Continuation of this thread, will make the arguments very clear now with a voting poll from the beginning, full disclosure though, if this becomes as much of a mess and flood and the last thread i will ask for this to be closed and make a staff thread instead, clear? ok, so for the thread itself...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com

If you could read the counter arguments that would be great, thank you very much.
LuffyRuffy46307
Could you take a look at the crt?

vsbattles.com

Spaces in Times Dragon Ball revision

Continuation of this thread, will make the arguments very clear now with a voting poll from the beginning, full disclosure though, if this becomes as much of a mess and flood and the last thread i will ask for this to be closed and make a staff thread instead, clear? ok, so for the thread itself...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com

If you could read the counter arguments that would be great, thank you very much.
LuffyRuffy46307
Could you take a look at the crt?



vsbattles.com

Spaces in Times Dragon Ball revision

Continuation of this thread, will make the arguments very clear now with a voting poll from the beginning, full disclosure though, if this becomes as much of a mess and flood and the last thread i will ask for this to be closed and make a staff thread instead, clear? ok, so for the thread itself...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com



If you could read the counter arguments that would be great, thank you very much.
Georredannea15
Hi Damage, can you take a look at this revision if you have time? We need more staff.

vsbattles.com

God have mercy on Saiki, because I won't... Saiki downgrade thread??? [Part 1]

Alr, here we go again! Well, with this revision, Saiki's novel is again treated as canon on the wiki. Everything is perfect so far, but I noticed something in the profile. All abilities and some resistances of Saiki are 5 Dimensional[1][2][Explanation 1] All abilities and resistances work on...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
FantaRin_The_First
'ey. 'ey. fanta here. Can you evaluate this calc for me? It's just me getting the value of destroying a in-verse ship. No pixelscaling as it already has specified dimensions.
FantaRin_The_First
FantaRin_The_First
Yo, Clover. Quick question. The thing I calc'ed also has an official weight. Should I redo my calc or is it fine as is?
CloverDragon03
CloverDragon03
That'd actually be better yeah. Divide its mass by the density of steel to get its volume, then do fragmentation from there
FantaRin_The_First
FantaRin_The_First
Done. Remade it with the official weight.
Yuhady123
Hi Ultima, what you thought on this post regarding the issue that seem to heat if Demmateis works will be split from Main cosmology.
No to say, all this stuffs like "Worlds within world" "A universe is a multiverses to all of other universe of possibilities" "Omniverse" "A lager thought is contained by another larger thought" is more of the same idea but explained in different tone.

Every writers including him adopted this idea into their works. Dematteis works specifically explained this R>F Hierarchy of Universes in more detail, like this phrase "World within world" which was used by every writers.

Even without Dematteis, the scale of Main cosmology will still remain the same. Like I said above, the Main cosmology still has the its own of infinite universe contained by universe which in turn contained by multiverse. To understand what im saying, The Superflow encompassed the Earth-616 and other alternates universes, all of choices maked in universes like Earth-616 would result in branching out Earth-616-1, Earth-616-2 and infinite which Earth-616 encompasses them. Then in turn Earth-616-1 can also branch another infinite universe of possibilities and this go on infinitly just like this statement. So no in my point of view.

"As above, so below"
Click to expand...
Back
Top