• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

A bunch of SCP Upgrades

Tllmbrg

Tllmbrg

VS Battles
Content Moderator
4,924
2,330
So SCP-682's experiment log has new feats, lets talk about who gets what upgrade

--------------------------------------------

SCP-106 upgrades


"Note: The following incident occurred during a duel containment breach of SCP-106 and SCP-953

Items: SCP-106 and SCP-953

Tissue Test Record: N/A

Termination Log: SCP-106 and SCP-953 both break into 682's containment. There is no indication either item did this deliberately. Once the three items became aware of the others' presence, all ceased movements and regarded each other with visible hostility, resulting a stalemate. 106 broke this stalemate by lowering itself through the floor them attempting to apprehend 953, who responded by latching itself on 682. All three items were presumably transported to 106's pocket dimension. After a period of five hours, all three items manifested back in 682's containment chamber, bearing heavy wounds from prolonged combat. 106 was the first to leave the area, returning to its containment cell. MTF teams deployed in preparation for the return of the items were able to apprehend 953. 682 had its body mass reduced by 67%, but has since recovered.

Note: I'm amazed all three are still alive, baring 682. 953 won't talk about what happened and neither will 682. I can only assume it was brutal, judging from their injuries. Measures are being taken to ensure this never happens again, but we got really lucky. If 106 hadn't taken the other two into the pocket dimension, this could have resulted in hundreds of causalities. - O5-6"

So off this abttel 106 should get a 9-A Key for duarbility off fighting against SCP-682 and 953 for 5 hours and only having heavy wounds
This can only possibly give him a supersonic Key in speed but due to us not knowing how the fight went this's a less certain one


---------------------------------------------


The Foundation upgrades


"Item: Several memetic kill agents, such as auditory triggers, kill words, and the Berryman-Langford Memetic Kill Agent (BLMKA)

Note: Haven't seen this tried out yet, so I'm giving this a shot.

Tissue Test: N/A

Termination Log: SCP-682 was placed in a modified containment cell comprised of large electronic displays and loudspeakers. Then, the memetic kill agents were activated. SCP-682 initially started to undergo signs of cardiac arrest and grand mal seizure. After approximately 20 minutes of exposure, SCP-682 ceased life signs. However, it soon revived 30 seconds afterwards, screaming various kill words at ÔûêÔûêÔûê dB, passing through sound insulation and killing ÔûêÔûê personnel. SCP-682 replaced in containment. Proposal to add computer-generated incapacitating cognitohazards to SCP-682's containment chamber is pending approval."

So they should probably have the fact they have memetics that can kill 682 for a short while added to their page, also this's a showcase of potency since memetics are mind manipulation and 682 resists that

----------------------------------------


SCP-049 upgrades


Item: SCP-049

"Tissue Test: N/A, Overridden by O5-Command.

Termination Log: SCP-049 was introduced to SCP-682, SCP-049 stared at SCP-682 and slowly walked over to SCP-682 saying "The disease appears to not affect only Humans." SCP-682 backed up and SCP-049 grabbed SCP-682. In response, SCP-682 clawed at SCP-049 and SCP-049 ran to the other side of the testing chamber. SCP-049 seemed emotionally disturbed and appeared to be in shock. SCP-049 and SCP-682 were escorted to their chambers.

Note: How the hell did SCP-682 manage to "emotionally disturb" SCP-049?"

Now you can approach this in a few ways, either 049 should get a new durability Key like 106 so 9-A or a new speed Key to superhuman-supersonic+(depending on what we'll consider 682's speed here to be) this's due to this section not mentioning 049 getting hurt, the way its structured makes me lean towards a new speed Key personally

------------------------------------

Summary:

9-A Key for 106's durability

Adding the memetics to The Foundation's page

Either a new speed Key of superhuman or supersonic+ for 049 or a 9-A durability Key

Someone should make a SCP-953 profile here
 
We don't generally upgrade 682 based on the most very recent entries in the experiment log, since they haven't had time to be reviewed by staff and culled for quality.

Since these upgrades come from the most recent 3 experiments have been written in only the past week, I reject these upgrades for now. Wait a few months first.
 
Agnaa said:
We don't generally upgrade 682 based on the most very recent entries in the experiment log, since they haven't had time to be reviewed by staff and culled for quality.

Since these upgrades come from the most recent 3 experiments have been written in only the past week, I reject these upgrades for now. Wait a few months first.
Click to expand...
A few months seems too long, also even logs that were a long time on the page can always be deleted, anyone remembers SCP-2727?(if I got the number wrong the SCP that gave 682 a solar system level feat)
 
Tllmbrg said:
A few months seems too long, also even logs that were a long time on the page can always be deleted, anyone remembers SCP-2727?(if I got the number wrong the SCP that gave 682 a solar system level feat)

So how long should we wait exactly?
Click to expand...
That's true, but it's better to wait until it's been checked rather than adding them instantly. Just because stuff can change later doesn't mean we should add stuff to the site immediately.

I think we should wait until we've seen evidence of the list being trimmed down/reviewed by staff while those newest entries have been around. So wait until a staff member removes/alters some, or until a staff member comments fixes or comments that they're all fine, something like that. Sometimes this has taken months in the past.
 
I suppose, but like how many months should we wait?

But if in theory this'll stay for that long are you okay with the proposed upgrades ?
 
Tllmbrg said:
I suppose, but like how many months should we wait?
Click to expand...
I don't know, we've never had someone demanding an exact time for accepting this before. We've just collectively intuited how long's a fair enough time to wait/when a staff member has checked it.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Didnt we have a thing where if its under a certain number of upvotes we dont allow it?
Click to expand...
We do (10 upvotes) but that's not useful for a collaborative document.
 
Agnaa said:
Tllmbrg said:
I suppose, but like how many months should we wait?
Click to expand...
I don't know, we've never had someone demanding an exact time for accepting this before. We've just collectively intuited how long's a fair enough time to wait/when a staff member has checked it.
Click to expand...
Then we should have a standard for that too, just like the minum upvote thing
 
Tllmbrg said:
Then we should have a standard for that too, just like the minum upvote thing
Click to expand...
That sounds like a huge pain in the ass to write a standard for one page of canon for one character in one verse, but I'll ask around about it.
 
I mean there're other collaborative experiment logs like 914's so this could also be applied to those ones

But 682's log is a pretty important part for scaling since its the reason why SCP-162 has a 9-A key or why SCP-096 gets his second key

Someone like SCP-999 has his entry there mentioned to showcase to further his mind manipulation so like 682's log is also pretty important here so we should make the rules about it clear
 
Here's my proposal:

We don't add entries after the most recent moderator edit of the collaborative log, where the edit is done for upkeep/clean-up/removal.

That way we run the least risk of hastily slapping on feats and abilities right before a mod practically retcons it from the source material.
 
Dargoo Faust said:
Here's my proposal:
We don't add entries after the most recent moderator edit of the collaborative log, where the edit is done for upkeep/clean-up/removal.

That way we run the least risk of hastily slapping on feats and abilities right before a mod practically retcons it from the source material.
Click to expand...
So basically not to put the most recent stuff that was put after a mod edit? What if the entry is over a half year old or was there any longer?

I think having a set amount of time to wait before approving the use of said entry in the log is a better course of action
 
I'd genuinely be worried about the state of the page considering how popular 682 is, if no mods vetted the page for over a year. Nor is that something I ever recall happening; for example the last mod edit seemed to have only been a week or two ago.
 
Dargoo Faust said:
I'd genuinely be worried about the state of the page considering how popular 682 is, if no mods vetted the page for over a year. Nor is that something I ever recall happening; for example the last mod edit seemed to have only been a week or two ago.
Click to expand...
I mean the standard should be for all collaborative not just 682's and some weren't touched for a decet amount of time iirc, either way mod edits are random in terms of when they happen so I still don't think its a good way to track what we can add
 
I think they are a good way to track, because we're looking for oversight and approval. Just because it's sporadic doesn't mean we should eschew the only standards that make SCP allowable on vsbw in the first place.
 
Well I suppose we'll wait until the next edit then, also you never answered if you agree with the upgrades if this in theory is good to use
 
Dargoo Faust said:
I'd genuinely be worried about the state of the page considering how popular 682 is, if no mods vetted the page for over a year. Nor is that something I ever recall happening; for example the last mod edit seemed to have only been a week or two ago.
Click to expand...
The mods recently wiped out a bunch of the more ridiculous entries on that page
 
I didn't bother looking into them, I'm not interested in any of the SCPs mentioned for upgrades, I only care about the potential rules violation it presents.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Dargoo Faust said:
I'd genuinely be worried about the state of the page considering how popular 682 is, if no mods vetted the page for over a year. Nor is that something I ever recall happening; for example the last mod edit seemed to have only been a week or two ago.
Click to expand...
The mods recently wiped out a bunch of the more ridiculous entries on that page
Click to expand...
What did they wipe? We might need to edit 682's wiki page depending on what was removed
 
WeeklyBattles said:
682's page is fine, the wipe was done before 682's page was reworked
Click to expand...
If we talking about reworks shouldn't SCP-204 get to its 9-A key justifction its fight with SCP-682? His entry in 682's log is there for a decent amount of time so it should be okay to use
 
SCP-204-1 already has a 8-C feat in original canon. Why would we make an extended canon key for just a 9-A feat?
 
I mean SCP-096's wiki page has 9-A likely higher Key twice so not like it'd be the first SCP with sorta pointless Key Only difference the second one says at least

I in general don't get 204's durability justifiction so his fight 682 in the other Key gives him a better reasoning for it

Also why not add it?
 
SCP-096's extended canon key adds extra abilities.

Why not add it? Because it adds literally nothing except for unnecessarily expanding the justification and doubling the size of the profile.
 
Actually this can add a new speed Key of either superhuman or supersonic+ for SCP-204-1
 
Alright, I don't have a strong objection to it then, but it still seems not super notable.
 
I mean sure its not a big upgrade but not like you can ignore this fight, tho if we do it with the Keys do we just add Extended Canon Key?

Also we should get more people's opinion on this first
 
You'd change the original keys to have (Original Canon) at the end, and the latter two keys would be named similarly but have (Extended Canon) at the end.

I mean, we can ignore it, we do sometimes not include minor upgrades/alternate appearances/minor characters even if it is an upgrade or has slightly better stats. Some people don't care enough to make a page/key for everything in a verse.

True.
 
I see

If it's about caring I'll do the edit myself, also I wouldn't call it that minor since going from unkown to superhuman or supersonic+ is a noticable change

Also should we simply wait or make another thread for this?
 
idk
 
T0234807H said:
Just need to do some grammar corrections, please undo the locks just for a moment.
Click to expand...
Dude, just contact a staff member directly.
 
So eh will we go with adding a new Key for SCP-204 or what?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

JustANormalPerson01
It seems our lizard finally made contact with some narrative hazards
Replies
22
Views
5K
Kirinator07
Kirinator07
Comiphorous
SCP-682 adapted to VSBattles and is missing a weakness (NEEDS STAFF)
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
Kirinator07
Kirinator07
Tllmbrg
Random Bunch CRT (SCP-343, SCP-1529, SCP-018)
2
Replies
62
Views
5K
AmogusSusfunni
AmogusSusfunni
Hsharpe
SCP-2747 VS SCP-682
Replies
2
Views
2K
JustANormalLemon
JustANormalLemon
AmogusSusfunni
The Absence Overhaul (SCP CRT)
Replies
8
Views
3K
AmogusSusfunni
AmogusSusfunni
Back
Top