• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Zeno Low 1-C?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Iamunanimousinthat said:
Infinite snapshots x finite number x infinite snapshots = same infinity
Click to expand...
If its uncountably higher it’s not the same infinity and if infinite snapshots x finite number equaled the same infinity then a universe is High 3-A instead of Low 2-C

Space the size of the obseravble universe is finite x uncountably infinite snapshots makes it 4D since uncountably infinite increase is a higher dimension as said in our tiering system and FAQ so this is blatantly just wrong

If we followed this logic a Universe is just High 3-A uncountably infinite makes the difference while countably infinite and another countably infinite is the same size since its apart of the same infinite set and is no bigger
LuffyRuffy46307 said:
Am I the only one who thinks DB needs another cosmology overhaul, or am I going crazy?
Click to expand...
Tbh this would need to be a wiki thing because I don’t think this is an issue just for DB
 
TheGodOfICE777 said:
If its uncountably higher it’s not the same infinity and if infinite snapshots x finite number equaled the same infinity then a universe is High 3-A instead of Low 2-C
Tbh this would need to be a wiki thing because I don’t think this is an issue just for DB
Click to expand...
I also agree, wiki should address this issue and fast, because cosmology has a high chance of being that according to themselves.
 
TheGodOfICE777 said:
If its uncountably higher it’s not the same infinity and if infinite snapshots x finite number equaled the same infinity then a universe is High 3-A instead of Low 2-C

Space the size of the obseravble universe is finite x uncountably infinite snapshots makes it 4D since uncountably infinite increase is a higher dimension as said in our tiering system and FAQ so this is blatantly just wrong

If we followed this logic a Universe is just High 3-A uncountably infinite makes the difference while countably infinite and another countably infinite is the same size since its apart of the same infinite set and is no bigger
Click to expand...
That’s just an issue with the wiki. But uncountably infinite (Aleph1) times finite number is still Aleph1.

And Aleph1 times Aelph1 is just Aleph1^2 which is still Aleph1.


Kulf_Boba said:
(uncountable infinite number of snapshots x finite number) x uncountable infinity = Low 1-C.
Click to expand...
Wrong. It equals the same cardinality.
 
Iamunanimousinthat said:
That’s just an issue with the wiki. But uncountably infinite (Aleph1) times finite number is still Aleph1.

And Aleph1 times Aelph1 is just Aleph1^2 which is still Aleph1.



Wrong. It equals the same cardinality.
Click to expand...
aleph 1 isn’t the highest uncountable infinite uncountable infinities extend to aleph omega and inaccessible cardinals

aleph 2 would be an example of being uncountably above Aleph 1
 
The spacetimes of the 12 universes are overarched by the timeline, with the former having an already having uncountably infinite snapshots of every moment in time, being superseded by the entire timeline which is low 1-C. The timeline would be uncountably infinitely above these low 2-C structures which are still uncountably infinite snapshots of the universe, how is that not low 1-C?
 
TiltedFN said:
The spacetimes of the 12 universes are overarched by the timeline, with the former having an already having uncountably infinite snapshots of every moment in time, being superseded by the entire timeline which is low 1-C. The timeline would be uncountably infinitely above these low 2-C structures which are still uncountably infinite snapshots of the universe, how is that not low 1-C?
Click to expand...
Because it is still the same number of infinite snapshots.
 
Iamunanimousinthat said:
Because it is still the same number of infinite snapshots.
Click to expand...
But it isn't though, the low 2-C structure already has those uncountable infinite snapshots, and then the timeline has uncountable infinite snapshots of those 4d structures, which according to this wiki is 5d, that is blatant evidence of two temporal dimensions.
 
TiltedFN said:
But it isn't though, the low 2-C structure already has those uncountable infinite snapshots, and then the timeline has uncountable infinite snapshots of those 4d structures, which according to this wiki is 5d, that is blatant evidence of two temporal dimensions.
Click to expand...
That's not evidence of two temporal dimensions. The two temporal dimensions must be apart of the same space to count as 5D. You are just describing a 4D structures inside 4D structures.

Uncountably infinity x uncountably infinity = same uncountably infinity.
 
Iamunanimousinthat said:
That's not evidence of two temporal dimensions. The two temporal dimensions must be apart of the same space to count as 5D. You are just describing a 4D structures inside 4D structures.

Uncountably infinity x uncountably infinity = same uncountably infinity.
Click to expand...
Bruh what, you act like we are just multiplying it by another spacetime, the timeline is uncountably infinitely above these low 2-C constructs, so its not even multiplying.
 
TiltedFN said:
Bruh what, you act like we are just multiplying it by another spacetime, the timeline is uncountably infinitely above these low 2-C constructs, so its not even multiplying.
Click to expand...
You liked a post above that was trying showcase this through faulty multiplication but anyway:

Containing something doesn't equal "uncountably infinitely above something"
 
WTF said:
How can containing an uncountable infinite number of 4D structures still be 4D?
Click to expand...
Because it only has 4 axes of dimensions.

All dimensional spaces of R^n, contain an equal number of uncountable infinite structures. The only difference between them is the number of dimensional axes.
 
Iamunanimousinthat said:
Because it only has 4 axes of dimensions.

All dimensional spaces of R^n, contain an equal number of uncountable infinite structures. The only difference between them is the number of dimensional axes.
Click to expand...
But it acts as a 2nd temporal dimension, that is the reason, you speak as if it were the same time axis, but the timeline overarches the low 2-C constructs, so it makes no sense to still be 4d.
 
WTF said:
??? ???
"there are only 4 axes of dimensions "/" the only difference between them is the number of dimensional axes "
Click to expand...
4D dimensional space can be described as R^4
5D dimensional space can be described as R^5

R^4 = R^5 = R^n. This is what I mean when I said they all have the same equal number of uncountably infinite structures.

However, geometrically speaking:

4D space has 4D volume and 0 5D volume
5D space has 5D volume and 5D volume

Being able to destroy that 5D volume is what gives the higher tier.

Which is why, a 4D space containing a 4D space wouldn't warrant a higher tier.

TiltedFN said:
But it acts as a 2nd temporal dimension, that is the reason, you speak as if it were the same time axis, but the timeline overarches the low 2-C constructs, so it makes no sense to still be 4d.
Click to expand...
The 2D temporal dimension is about a space having 2 dimensions of time, 3 axes of space plus 2 axes of time. A timeline overarching low 2-C constructs, would still be 4D unless stated to have 2 axes of time.
 
Iamunanimousinthat said:
4D dimensional space can be described as R^4
5D dimensional space can be described as R^5

R^4 = R^5 = R^n. This is what I mean when I said they all have the same equal number of uncountably infinite structures.

However, geometrically speaking:

4D space has 4D volume and 0 5D volume
5D space has 5D volume and 5D volume

Being able to destroy that 5D volume is what gives the higher tier.

Which is why, a 4D space containing a 4D space wouldn't warrant a higher tier.


The 2D temporal dimension is about a space having 2 dimensions of time, 3 axes of space plus 2 axes of time. A timeline overarching low 2-C constructs, would still be 4D unless stated to have 2 axes of time.
Click to expand...
But we gave proof of an additional direction of time, an added temporal dimension. So it's not as simple as a 4d structure containing another4d structure.
 
Quantu said:
This Q and A thread turned into more than it should've.
Click to expand...
I have to agree with you, I think after this I think there might be an opportunity for Dragon Ball, even if it's a small one.

I haven't seen you for a long time, what happened to make you disappear, bro?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Yohata
Dragon Ball low 1-C ?
Replies
22
Views
2K
LuffyRuffy46307
LuffyRuffy46307
MightyFrogBeyond
How to Keep infinite branching timelines as Low 2-C??
Replies
2
Views
616
MightyFrogBeyond
MightyFrogBeyond
Baabasaplar95
DBS Universe 7 Low 1-C?
Replies
11
Views
2K
Spicy78
Spicy78
MightyFrogBeyond
5D space contains uncountably infinite amount of 4DSTCs but still not Low 1-C?
Replies
4
Views
576
Secimatar
Secimatar
Wikisource
Which could be Low 1-C?
Replies
2
Views
535
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top