Dust_Collector
They/Them- 7,831
- 8,995
- Thread starter
- #81
Gonna give this a bump, wanna get this done before I slam down another upgrade for Zelda to bump some peeps up to High 6-C.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I disagree. It's mentioned a couple times that the scared and holy aspects can destroy evilThe Light Arrows haven't really ever displayed duraneg,
And here is a weapon that can penetrate the Evil King's defenses... The power given to the chosen ones... The sacred Light Arrow!
You got the Light Arrow! Set it to (C) and your arrows will be powered up! The light of justice will smite evil!
You got the Light Arrow! Set it to (C) to power up your arrows. The light of justice shall target evil!
You got the Light Arrow! When you take out your bow, use [R] to change arrowheads, then fire away. The sacred light of these arrows can pierce pure evil itself!
The six Sages will open the sealed door and lure Ganondorf back into the Sacred Realm. I will then seal the door to the Sacred Realm from this world. Thus, Ganondorf the Evil King will vanish from Hyrule. Link... In order to do this, I need your courage again. Please protect me while I do my part. And here is a weapon that can penetrate the Evil King's defenses... The power given to the chosen ones... The sacred Light Arrow!
Puppet Ganon, Habitat: Ganon's Castle, Effective Weapon: Light Arrows, This is a gigantic marionette created by Ganon himself. It transforms into three different shapes, but all are vulnerable to rays of light
To me it's more about light/holiness being effective against evil, which is more of a durability negation thing than a strength thing.Bow of Light: Princess Zelda gave you this bow and arrow for the battle with Dark Beast Ganon. When wielded by the hero, it fires arrows of pure light strong enough to oppose the Calamity.
You know there's a difference between being vulnerable to something and it being actively weak to it right? Or in your case, an item having the ability to ignore durabilityI disagree. It's mentioned a couple times that the scared and holy aspects can destroy evil
To me it's more about light/holiness being effective against evil, which is more of a durability negation thing than a strength thing.
Literally says it's a power up, which it is, because they're way the **** strongerYou got the Light Arrow! Set it to (C) and your arrows will be powered up! The light of justice will smite evil!
Again says it's a power up, being able to effect evil doesn't mean it's duraneg.You got the Light Arrow! Set it to (C) to power up your arrows. The light of justice shall target evil!
Yes, again, see point 1.You got the Light Arrow! When you take out your bow, use [R] to change arrowheads, then fire away. The sacred light of these arrows can pierce pure evil itself!
Literally reiterating the exact thing I said, this quite literally is going against your point.The six Sages will open the sealed door and lure Ganondorf back into the Sacred Realm. I will then seal the door to the Sacred Realm from this world. Thus, Ganondorf the Evil King will vanish from Hyrule. Link... In order to do this, I need your courage again. Please protect me while I do my part. And here is a weapon that can penetrate the Evil King's defenses... The power given to the chosen ones... The sacred Light Arrow!
Yeah, he's vulnerable to them? Doesn't mean they're duraneg, to compare, he's immune to basically everything else.Puppet Ganon, Habitat: Ganon's Castle, Effective Weapon: Light Arrows, This is a gigantic marionette created by Ganon himself. It transforms into three different shapes, but all are vulnerable to rays of light
And this one straight up says they're strong enough to do it.Bow of Light: Princess Zelda gave you this bow and arrow for the battle with Dark Beast Ganon. When wielded by the hero, it fires arrows of pure light strong enough to oppose the Calamity.
I'm not seeing it. They all say that holy/scared injury can pierce evil and target evil. Its aspect of their sacred energy rather than strength.My brother in Christ, all you posted is statements that corroborate my claim, not yours.
I'm going to assume youre joking givenI'm not seeing it. They all say that holy/scared injury can pierce evil and target evil. Its aspect of their sacred energy rather than strength.
Did you really just pre-emptively stone wall? If you have actual proof, post it, and I'll concede, but everything you just posted ties directly into what I said, and some of which straight up contradict you. Is what I would say but you literally just said you aren't even willing to budge your stance, which is kinda ****** up imo.I'm not getting into another multi-week long conversation with you because neither of us are budging here so others can decide and we'll just go with majority opinion.
I have but you disagree with it.If you have actual proof, post it, and I'll concede
You won't change your stance either, so there's no reason to drag this out longer than it has been.Is what I would say but you literally just said you aren't even willing to budge your stance, which is kinda ****** up imo.
You're misunderstanding my point about durability negation. It's that because they're holy they can pierce the defenses and harm Evil characters.Hell I even pointed out a blatant example in them not ignoring durability, because if they did, Ganon would be one shot just like the far less evil mooks the light arrows literally vaporize.
Again, you realize over half of those statements flat out contradict your claim right?I have but you disagree with it.
You said you refused to change your stance before the conversation even got anywhereIt's not me stone walling. I'm just asking for other people to comment like with any other thread. Whatever the majority picks we go with.
A blatant accusation, and one I don't quite appreciate, especially given I just said I would, if you posted actual tangible non-contradictory proof. You did not and instead just decided not to participate, which is fine, you don't have to if you don't want to, but you proceed to say I won't either? Kinda ****** up ngl chief , that's just your own preconceived notions and bias talkingYou won't change your stance either, so there's no reason to drag this out longer than it has been.
If we did that we'd have shit like 3-A Saitama.Others can comment. If they agree the light arrows are more AP than durability negation or something similar to that effect, it's fine and the suggested High 6-A changes can be made. If not then the scaling is the same and Link's light arrows just get durability negation against evil characters.
You're misunderstanding how they work in the first place to begin with, it's functionally the same as the Master Sword, something we rate as AP, and scale characters to, and from it, because while it has funny meme evil-negating effects, can bypass evil's defenses, and is literally called the "Blade of Evil's Bane", it still has to actually have the AP to harm the thing in question, the light arrow is no different, this is even reflected from a gameplay perspective with it being able to obliterate mooks, straight up vaporizing some enemies, but canonically can not do so to someone like Ganon, Gomez or Twinmold, who are magnitudes more powerful yet evil compared to a funny moblin, unless you want to argue Ganon and the lads actually have resistance to holy weaponry, because that's what would need to be the case in order to explain why they're not one-shot despite logically, being even more susceptible to it, plus we'd have to toss Master Sword scaling too if we go with your light arrow just duraneg and lack AP of their own route.You're misunderstanding my point about durability negation. It's that because they're holy they can pierce the defenses and harm Evil characters.
I personally don't see it that way. Which is why I said that this isn't going anywhere because I can already see that you aren't going to change your mind and I'm not going to do so either. So there's no reason to discuss this further rather than vote.Again, you realize over half of those statements flat out contradict your claim right?
Honestly have to agree with this.To me it's more about light/holiness being effective against evil, which is more of a durability negation thing than a strength thing.
That they're holy/sacred and specifically damage evil people because of those properties.what’s the arguments against the High 6-C scaling for light arrows again?
Was Twinmold evil in nature though? I’m pretty sure it was just a normal monster occupying the territory before clink showed up
It's a masked monster and is either created or influenced by Majora. Since Majora's curse/opening of the Stonetower relies on Twinmold being alive.Was Twinmold evil in nature though?
This is basically my thought as well.I actually think the Light Arrows are both AP and Duraned/Damage Boost agains evil.
In the remake it has the giant eye of Majora that all other bosses have.What? When was it ever stated to be created by Majora
It's actively causing a curse on the lands and is keeping s giant imprisoned. Both aren't exactly passive or good things.It could be influenced by Majora, but that doesn't make it evil
So? That doesn't mean he created it, it could very well just be corruptionIn the remake it has the giant eye of Majora that all other bosses have.
Actively? Do they say that at any point?It's actively causing a curse on the lands and is keeping s giant imprisoned. Both aren't exactly passive or good things.
Which still means it's evil and under my argument weak to the light arrows.So? That doesn't mean he created it, it could very well just be corruption
The local deity is only from the Manga afaik. No in game source talks about it being a God or Guardian spirit.pretty sure odolwa is revered as a local deity and he has the eye in the remake too
Its keeping the Gates of the Stonetower open. It's why upon its defeat the curse it caused is lifted (unrelated to the blood curse of the land that was always there).Actively? Do they say that at any point?
The argument isn't more evil = more damage. But evil is vulnerable to sacred/divine light from the light arrows. Them not being one shot doesn't mean they can't be vulnerable.Regardless, you have to actually prove Twinmold is as evil as say,
Given your argument involves taking a multitude of statements out of context, can't quite say I care much for it lad.Which still means it's evil and under my argument weak to the light arrows.
Wasn't thinking of the manga, actually thinking about it, are any of the beings created by Majora? They never say that any point do they? If anything you'd think they've existed for as long as the temples have.The local deity is only from the Manga afaik. No in game source talks about it being a God or Guardian spirit.
Even if it was, it's still evil, doing evil things and has Majora's corruption in it.
So?Its keeping the Gates of the Stonetower open. It's why upon its defeat the curse it caused is lifted (unrelated to the blood curse of the land that was always there).
Yeah nah, you said it was duraneg in your very first post in this topic that it ignores durability.The argument isn't more evil = more damage. But evil is vulnerable to sacred/divine light from the light arrows. Them not being one shot doesn't mean they can't be vulnerable.
In the base game they're all directly related to Majora's mettling and only appear after he came to Termina. The remake gives them all Majora's eyes and has them be weak spots, further suggesting Majora either made or corrupted them.Wasn't thinking of the manga, actually thinking about it, are any of the beings created by Majora?
Durability negation is the wrong term then. My intent was to say that the light arrows are holy/sacred and evil things are weak to that. Vulnerability fits better I guess but it's not really a power in of itselfYeah nah, you said it was duraneg in your very first post in this topic that it ignores durability.
Hmm, when do they say they only appear after he showed up?In the base game they're all directly related to Majora's mettling and only appear after he came to Termina. The remake gives them all Majora's eyes and has them be weak spots, further suggesting Majora either made or corrupted them.
That's what I've been saying this whole timeDurability negation is the wrong term then. My intent was to say that the light arrows are holy/sacred and evil things are weak to that. Vulnerability fits better I guess but it's not really a power in of itself
They only appear after Majora went to a region and cursed it. Do you have any information that they were there before Majora?Hmm, when do they say they only appear after he showed up?
It's not on me to prove a negative, you know how this works. You made the claim, you prove it. I never said they existed before, or after, I'm just saying it's vague as **** and either could be true so it's not really a good foundation of an argument or good reason to discredit anything.They only appear after Majora went to a region and cursed it. Do you have any information that they were there before Majora?
They only appear after Majora and the remake shows explicit signs that Majora has corrupted or created them.It's not on me to prove a negative, you know how this works
It means that if the arrows don't scale AP wise there's no reason for Ganon to scale AP wise.That still wouldn't void Ganon scaling to Twinmold
When do they say that? The curses and stuff showed up after the fact, but when do they at any point say Majora created them?They only appear after Majora and the remake shows explicit signs that Majora has corrupted or created them.
Nice try, again, it's on you to prove Majora created them, not me to prove they always existed.What evidence do you have to suggest they were there beforehand? Because what limited stuff we have implies a direct connection between their current existence and Majora.
So just ignore literally everything else we know about them and cherry-pick and take a bunch of out of context statements out, gotcha.It means that if the arrows don't scale AP wise there's no reason for Ganon to scale AP wise.
I already proved/stated that Majora corrupted them and used them to further its curses. The onus would be on you to prove that they aren't evil and are acting independently to disprove that assertion.Nice try, again, it's on you to prove Majora created them, not me to prove they always existed.
I already made my stance and asked for people to weigh in. As I said originally I don't see this going anywhere because I don't see either of us changing our minds. If more people agree with you we'll just go with that.Could you actually debate properly?
Backpedaling? You said he created them, even as recently as your last post. I'm going to take this to mean you can't prove he created them.I already proved/stated that Majora corrupted them and used them to further its curses. The onus would be on you to prove that they aren't evil and are acting independently to disprove that assertion.
And that means you just ignore every single piece of conceivable evidence while asserting out-of-context statements somehow supports your claim?I already made my stance and asked for people to weigh in. As I said originally I don't see this going anywhere because I don't see either of us changing our minds. If more people agree with you we'll just go with that.
No ChariotBackpedaling
I've always said they were created or influenced by Majora.It's a masked monster and is either created or influenced by Majora.
I've explained what I'm doing already. I've presented my arguments, let you make plenty of counter points and then said let people vote on them.No offense but what are you doing?
Eh idk about that chief, it's either backpedaling, or you just wasted a bunch of time arguing a point that ultimately didn't matterNo Chariot
And how many times in the last several messages have you continued on saying they were created, despite the fact I said hours ago that corruption is viable? The answer is like 3 or 4.I've always said they were created or influenced by Majora.
You did, I'm moreso just baffled that you're still running with it and pretending there isn't a pile of contradictory evidence that you have to actually explain and have fit within your argument in order for it to hold weight. When your arguments amount to mostly out-of-context scans and then just blatant ignoring of everything else to try and paint a picture that is demonstrably not fully true, you could call that an argument, but that's just being disingenuous imo, whether it's intentional or not.I've explained what I'm doing already. I've presented my arguments, let you make plenty of counter points and then said let people vote on them.
This I don't get. I've provided the entire quote for everything I've quoted. Out of context would involve me leaving off sentences or important words/context.When your arguments amount to mostly out-of-context scans
They do have an AP component, which I was wrong to imply otherwise, but it's noted that they're "particularly effective against dark-souled enemies who fear the light". Indicating that its not just raw power, but strength combined with a vulnerability against evil people. Which would include Twinmold, Gomess and Ganondorf.Light Arrows require massive amounts of magical power to use, but they're extremely effective. These magical weapons cause much more damage than normal arrows, particularly when they are used against dark-souled enemies who fear the light.https://web.archive.org/web/20160309175700/http://zelda.com/universe/pedia/l.jsp
You do realize that's literally what you did right? Half your statements involve bypassing Ganon's specific invulnerability. It isn't speaking in general terms. Like 3 of your statements are talking in general, half are not.This I don't get. I've provided the entire quote for everything I've quoted. Out of context would involve me leaving off sentences or important words/context.
But since we consider the old Zelda dictionary vaguely canon going by our good profiles, the article on the Light Arrows is pretty clear
Yeah and? Nobody but you was arguing otherwise, the fact it took you this long to realize they have an AP component, despite the fact you yourself posted 3 statements saying they're powerful as ****, and one that even says its strength is the reason it can harm Calamity Ganon and me posting another statement saying its power enables it to fell a demon king, with multiple examples showing there's a power component and durability enables one to take it better...They do have an AP component, which I was wrong to imply otherwise, but it's noted that they're "particularly effective against dark-souled enemies who fear the light". Indicating that its not just raw power, but strength combined with a vulnerability against evil people. Which would include Twinmold, Gomess and Ganondorf.
They don't need to be High 6-A to damage Twinmold when Twinmold would be a dark-souled enemy that would be vulnerable to the arrows.
We still run into that issue of Ganondorf taking light arrows without the ToP in WW though. Which under the scaling would mean Toon Link would also need to be High 6-A, unless we're saying the arrows fried from Zelda are significantly worse than the arrows fired from Link (which even without that you have stuff with Puppet Ganon which would also make it weird in my view).Which is no different than say, WW Ganon (atm) vs a Darknut (which the light arrows one shot).
That's an issue with the scaling and that whole interaction being very fucky, not an issue with the light arrows, damage boost, durability and so on.We still run into that issue of Ganondorf taking light arrows without the ToP in WW though. Which under the scaling would mean Toon Link would also need to be High 6-A, unless we're saying the arrows fried from Zelda are significantly worse than the arrows fired from Link (which even without that you have stuff with Puppet Ganon which would also make it weird in my view).