- 15,490
- 10,297
Why do we assume that making a hole in a mountain is not mountain level but making a hole in a character that has mountain durability is mountain level if the logic is the same?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know that, but I am talking about making holes, like, if an attack make a hole in a mountain, it wont be mountain level, but if a character make a hole in the chest of a character who has mountain durability, the character is rated as mountain levelDestroying an entire mountain, at minimum assumption, is Low 7-B, Bern. We can calculate the destruction of a mountain or making a hole. We don't need to make assumptions.
like, if this bear that I draw had a Mountain durability, if a character could make a hole in this bear, the character would scale to a mountain level, but if a character made a hole in a mountain, they wont scale to a full mountain, but we do it to characters who made a role in the bear despite not making a hole in the full bear?I know that, but I am talking about making holes, like, if an attack make a hole in a mountain, it wont be mountain level, but if a character make a hole in the chest of a character who has mountain durability, the character is rated as mountain level
then why is making a hole in a character that can destroy a total mountain is mountain level if u didnt destroyed his entire body, but just made a hole?Because the durabilty of a mountain is not mountain level, its total destruction is.
That’s a terrible argument, or it’s at least a terrible way of phrasing one.Because the durabilty of a mountain is not mountain level, its total destruction is.
Is it though?That’s a terrible argument.
why would the durability of a mountain not be mountain levelIs it though?
I mean yeah, you could have explained it more since the op is a bit confused.Is it though?
Then call it a terrible explanation lol, i thought i was saying something wrong.I mean yeah, you could have explained it more since the op is a bit confused.
Fair fair, I did realise that and edited in “or it’s at least a terrible way of phrasing one.”, but yeah.Then call it a terrible explanation lol, i thought i was saying something wrong.
Lets look up what a mountain is made of: Rocks. You dont need Mountain level to destroy those. Give a human enough time and explosives and he could destroy that mountain sufficently over time. That woudnt make him Mountain level (I think it would make the total amounts of explosives used mountain level though? Dont know if we can combine their values like that), because again, you dont get mountain level values by being able to "harm" a mountain, you get mountain level by destroying one.why would the durability of a mountain not be mountain level
Wow mount fuji is pretty big, y is it the standard of mountains?Baseline Mountain level is roughly fragmenting 1/8th of Mount Fuji, but we did have a lot of threads trying to basically push for parameters for each tier. But yeah, destroying an average mountain is really only a Low 7-B feat.
It was explained fine, shut it dipshit.it is hillarious how people are incapable of explaining this properly though i bet that i'm about to be made fun of when my attempt fails rn
It isn't the standard for mountain feats, Mountain level also used to have an alternate name as "Large City level". And a Gigaton is also the baseline for Large Mountain level is another note. Though, I think that's slightly less controversial due to the word "Large". Tiers that have 1 PrefixTons or 100 PrefixTons aren't really based on any specific border. For example, Island level has a basis and that's nuking all of Cypress Island, but not so much Large Island level. Country level is also based off nuking all of Japan, but Small Country and Large Country don't really have a basis. Baseline for Continent level is nuking all of Russia, and nuking all of Eurasia is the baseline for High 6-A.Wow mount fuji is pretty big, y is it the standard of mountains?
i was joking and saying my explanation will probably end up misunderstood as well asshat. Didn't need to be rude.It was explained fine, shut it dipshit.
Arceus0x's post was indeed a bit arrogant, but I would encourage you not to escalate conflict.It was explained fine, shut it dipshit.
Y do you assume it?have we considered the notion that this may be one of those internet phenomenons known as a "le epic troll"?
it was just a way to try to explain better my points, as I am someone who usually like to od diagrams, and bears are the best thing that I can draw, but I am still bad with it, as it doesnt even have a mouth, it took 20 secondsWhat gave it away? The very accurate and adorable bear diagram?
I couldn't say. Some intangible feeling I have tipped me off, I suppose.What gave it away? The very accurate and adorable bear diagram?
One word: mountain.But why would a Mountain have Mountain level durability?