• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Why isn't Anos Low 1-C?

Status
Not open for further replies.
This was taken from the cosmology blog.
Idk if it's enough for 1-B tho. It's at least accepted as very high into both Low 2-C and 2-B.
Based on the actual context provided in the original CRT, it just seems like Xianxia novel logic with higher realms to me i.e. Everything is stupidly durable and strong, not higher dimensional. So yeah, just Low 2-C/2-B.
 
Based on the actual context provided in the original CRT, it just seems like Xianxia novel logic with higher realms to me i.e. Everything is stupidly durable and strong, not higher dimensional. So yeah, just Low 2-C/2-B.
it literally has higher layers, is not only a matter of being more durable
 
Based on the actual context provided in the original CRT, it just seems like Xianxia novel logic with higher realms to me i.e. Everything is stupidly durable and strong, not higher dimensional. So yeah, just Low 2-C/2-B.
Idk what context you're referring to, but the cosmology blog is more accurate than the CRT.

Each layer is a possibly infinite sized 4-D structure that contains countless space-time continuums. Since it would require an infinite amount of 4-D AP to destroy Layer 1, you could maybe argue that to destroy Layer 2 you would require higher infinite AP. Not sure if this theory is correct tho.
There's also a somewhat reality-fiction transcendence between the layers.
 
Last edited:
The only thing left to say is that the dimensional existence between each layer is incomparable, and that each layer shows that the previous one is nothing in comparison, and we will see what things await us in the 50+ layers.
 
With that logic Saitama is tier 0
Dude, no, Venuzdonoa is stated to destroy all things of creation, this context is about all things that are on Maou Gakuin, and Anos existence is superior than Venuzdonoa itself, Anos can destroy everything, Silver Sea is part of ''everything'', I don't even know why Saitama was mentioned
 
Well, I suppose you can attempt a CRT once more is known about the Silver Sea.
 
I'd be happy if the wiki just accepts "possibly 1-B"...
Man... Even with the information we have now there are still doubts and they will reject it again...we need more to make an impact at once, to get more than a simple "possible 1-B".
 
I mean, if the whole "a timeline or space-time continuum containing a whole other space-time continuum would be Low 1-C" is acceptable by wiki standards, then Maou Gakuin could be Low 1-C...

I'm just gonna leave this here...





The Silver Sea appears to have its own timeline, and it contains countless worlds which are separate space-time continuums...
 
I mean, if the whole "a timeline or space-time continuum containing a whole other space-time continuum would be Low 1-C" is acceptable by wiki standards, then Maou Gakuin could be Low 1-C...
you're right here
 
Not necessarily. You do realize that the objects can just be more durable right? That's all that you've proven here.


Like really, all of this has been brought up already and was still rejected. Unless there's new information, this isn't enough.
There is no question about durability. A spell that could destroy a 4D structure(a 4D structure means that it could be a low 2C, 2B or 2A stuff). Actually when we talk about a 4th dimension, we mean space time. But a 4-D shape is considered an infinite stack of 3D structures.
What you are saying is that the object is still a part of 4D structure but more durable. So if that spell could destroy a 4D structure that should destroy a part or matter belonging to the same dimensions.

The case here in Maou Gokuin is about Higher Dimensional Existence which refers to characters belonging to higher worlds or planes of reality with a no. of dimensions greater than 3D universes.Higher-Dimensional Existence refers to characters who belong to higher worlds or planes of reality with a number of dimensions greater than three-dimensional universes. In other words, they have bodies of at least four dimensions. The difference between these characters and those from ordinary space-time reality corresponds to the geometric difference between objects with different numbers of dimensions, such as a two-dimensional square and a three-dimensional cube. This means, it is more than countably infinite, not only quantitatively but also qualitatively. Characters of higher dimensions are often shown to be godlike with respect to lower dimensions, not only because of their superiority in strength but also due to their existence encompassing completely different laws of physics and logic, which are beyond the control of three-dimensional beings. It should be noted that having higher-dimensional power does not mean the character has a higher-dimensional existence, nor does higher-dimensional movement or Immeasurable speed, but some of these do mean that such characters can contend with these beings.
 
What I meant is that there is an involvement of another axis,i.e. another dimension, which being not visible to lower dimensional beings or objects or spells doesnot allows itself to be interact with a lower dimensional entity.
 
I see literally none of that based on the scans. Seriously, you keep regurgitating the same drivel over and over that I already heard before.

I can see Low 1-C but 1-B is a no as of now.
 
I see literally none of that based on the scans. Seriously, you keep regurgitating the same drivel over and over that I already heard before.

I can see Low 1-C but 1-B is a no as of now.
If you accept the low 1C stuff, it means you are accepting beings of dimensions from 5-6.

Low 1-C | Low Complex Multiverse level: Characters who can affect, create and/or destroy the entirety of spaces whose size corresponds to one to two higher levels of infinity greater than a standard universal model (Low 2-C structures, in plain English.) In terms of "dimensional" scale, this can be equated to 5 and 6-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 5 to R ^ 6).

So you are accepting 5D and 6D. So why not other dimensions. Obviously, the silver sea qualifies as a low 1C multiverse.
 
If you accept the low 1C stuff, it means you are accepting beings of dimensions from 5-6.

Low 1-C | Low Complex Multiverse level: Characters who can affect, create and/or destroy the entirety of spaces whose size corresponds to one to two higher levels of infinity greater than a standard universal model (Low 2-C structures, in plain English.) In terms of "dimensional" scale, this can be equated to 5 and 6-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 5 to R ^ 6).

So you are accepting 5D and 6D. So why not other dimensions. Obviously, the silver sea qualifies as a low 1C multiverse.
What does this even mean?

I'm accepting Low 1-C for the totality of the Silver Sea if it proves to have an overarching timeline over the individual universes it contains.

Why do I have to accept higher when the reasoning for 1-B has nothing to do with my agreeing to a possible Low 1-C rating?
 
Last edited:
What does this even mean?

I'm accepting Low 1-C for the totality of the Silcer Sea if it proves to have an overarching timeline over the individual universes it contains.

Why do I have to accept higher?
I am not telling you to accept higher. Low 1C means, characters of dimensions 5 to 6. But you just said that the object has more durability instead of being higher in dimension. And now you are accepting 5D and 6D structures which qualifies for low 1C.
We already went over this in another CRT. It's just higher degrees of Low 2-C/2-B or whatever the 1st layer is. None of this is enough for higher levels of existence in the sense of higher infinities.
 
I am not telling you to accept higher. Low 1C means, characters of dimensions 5 to 6. But you just said that the object has more durability instead of being higher in dimension. And now you are accepting 5D and 6D structures which qualifies for low 1C.
I'm not talking about the "layers" at all when I say I can possibly agree to Low 1-C for the Silver Sea. This is for entirely different reasoning.
 
I'm not talking about the "layers" at all when I say I can possibly agree to Low 1-C for the Silver Sea. This is for entirely different reasoning.
yeah, I am getting to your point but pls remember all the qualifications needed for low 1C. Actually, you said before about durability. I thought that you were not accepting about the possibility of higher dimension but then you accepted that low 1C stuff. Actually, I need to tell you something. Dimensions from tier low 2C to 2A is 4D. While from tier low 1C starts the beginning of 5th dimension.
 
You don't need to tell me about the tiering system, I know it well enough.

The Silver Sea would be Low 1-C if it proves to have its own overarching timeline. Since at that point it would be equivalent to an uncountably infinite number of snapshots of countless space-time continuums.

A cosmology doesn't have to specifically reference or use 5-dimensional spatial axes to qualify for Low 1-C.
 
I don't think only containing universes is enough for low 1-C,sea of nothingness in instant death contains universes and it's not low 1-C,demonbane is no different although there is universe inside universe
 
I don't think only containing universes is enough for low 1-C,sea of nothingness in instant death contains universes and it's not low 1-C,demonbane is no different although there is universe inside universe
It's not a matter of just containing universes but rather universes being embedded in a higher timeline. If that's proven it's them Low 1-C for the same reason a regular timeline is Low 2-C. Most of these verses just have universes float in a sort of void or large expanse.

Of course, this is if the Silver Sea proves to have its own space-time.
 
I don't think only containing universes is enough for low 1-C,sea of nothingness in instant death contains universes and it's not low 1-C,demonbane is no different although there is universe inside universe
New chapters in ID have shown that the verse cosmology possesses a multiverse embedded in a higher level space-time continuum, which is itself embedded in another continuum, and so on endlessly. Though, the CRT will not be posted any time soon.
 
endlessly is 1-B,not high 1-B and I really want to read the new chapter to see it's true or not but sadly the translation's quite slow and I still can't beleive that I have read up to vol 6 of this novel just to downplay it
 
The silver sea qualifies safely as a 1B structure. But anyways, I think the time has come for the cosmology to be upgraded to low 1C.
It doesn't. The staff that saw that thread and most of the others disagreed.

And please don't bring up "well, it wasn't handled well". We saw the majority of scans, that's really all that matters.
 
It doesn't. The staff that saw that thread and most of the others disagreed.

And please don't bring up "well, it wasn't handled well". We saw the majority of scans, that's really all that matters.
All we can do is to wait for the WN to be finished as:-
New chapters in ID have shown that the verse cosmology possesses a multiverse embedded in a higher level space-time continuum, which is itself embedded in another continuum, and so on endlessly. Though, the CRT will not be posted any time soon.
Anos has many new feats and this is his best feat:-
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top