Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what specifically did doktor sayI'd like to address a pet peeve. I've seen that Raiden is assumed to be able to cut through anything like a hot knife through butter. But even the good Doktor has straight up said that he cannot cut through anything like a hot knife through butter. He can in theory damage anything no matter how tough, but if durable enough it will require several hits to weaken.
what specifically did doktor say
This is just saying it has limits"It is a high-frequency blade, Raiden, not a plasma sword. There are limits to what it can cut. The HF waves strengthen the metallic bonds in the blade, improving its cutting ability... But in terms of pure physics, no blade can, erm, cut it in every situation. Theoretically speaking, an HF blade can damage anything, no matter how tough. But thick ceramic or carbon nanotube armor does not simply split open like butter with a hot knife. You need to chip away at it first, before you can destroy such material. "
well for one, it can't cut high 3-A characters or higher since by default their molecular bonds would be infinite in durability, just to an insanely lesser degree
and if you're like trillions of times into 3-A then I also think for the same reason, you'd be immune to HF dura negl.
well an 8-A attack would likely be able to atomize a 10-A human, so to survive the strength of an 8-A attack then your atoms must be holding together way betterHow does that work? I doubt its possible to know if high tier piercing can be resisted with blunt force durability
more like 8-C apparentlywell an 8-A attack would likely be able to atomize a 10-A human, so to survive the strength of an 8-A attack then your atoms must be holding together way better
so eventually it'd get to the point where a 7-B dura neg can't cut you anymore
But blunt force durability isn't always correlated to piercing, that's why there are brittle objects that are hard to cut or pierce like ceramicwell an 8-A attack would likely be able to atomize a 10-A human, so to survive the strength of an 8-A attack then your atoms must be holding together way better
so eventually it'd get to the point where a 7-B dura neg can't cut you anymore
I mean yeah but I don't think that really applies as much when it comes to like trillions of gubbaluppazettahoobajoulefoes or whatever, unless you're like infinite brittle or somethingBut blunt force durability isn't always correlated to piercing, that's why there are brittle objects that are hard to cut or pierce like ceramic
How? I don't think we would knowI mean yeah but I don't think that really applies as much when it comes to like trillions of gubbaluppazettahoobajoulefoes or whatever, unless you're like infinite brittle or something
because again, if your atoms weren't vastly stronger then a 3-A attack would atomize you instantlyHow? I don't think we would know
So?because again, if your atoms weren't vastly stronger then a 3-A attack would atomize you instantly
which is what the discussion is about, so....
You can, the blunt force durability of an object doesn't always correlate to piercing durabilitywhich is what the discussion is about, so....
even if you have the sharpest knife on earth, you're probably not gonna be able to do anything to an 8-A guy no matter how hard you swing
it's the same situation but on an atomic scale, you just wouldn't be able to cut the molecules of a 3-A dude, if a 3-A attack couldn't do the same
If you can survive not being atomized by a 3-A attack then an HF blade won’t be nearly strong enough do the trick, it seems simple enough to me.You can, the blunt force durability of an object doesn't always correlate to piercing durability
Ceramic armor is bigger than planck's length and Doktor listed that as something that needs multiple cuts.The only thing it can't cut is anything smaller than the Planck length
Dura Neg usually negates durability
Of course thickness matters, do you think 1 nanometer of the shit is going to hold up as well as 20m of the stuff? Of course not."In theory" means that, a theory, something hypothetical that corrabotated on a wide but ultimately limited data, that has yet to proven 100% in practice.
The issue with thickness is that, any weapon or tool, or hell person that fails at destruction because of it simply means the attack lacked the force or energy needed to destroy that amount of matter in one go.
The HF blade still would work under the rules of AP, and SS because of that; if it lacks the energy, then it shouldn't be able to damage it.