Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Neat. So, when will you make it? Also, don't forget the interesting calcsAzathoth the Abyssal Idiot said:Two of the three new Kaiju were category 4s, so they'd probably scale to stuff like Scunner and Raiju. One of them was a category 5, and while I don't think it's as strong as Slattern was, one could probably assume it was roughly on its level, at least. Same with the Mega Kaiju fusion, I'd assume.
Most of the new jaegers would scale to the cat 4s (maybe the cat 5, but it kinda ragdolled Gipsy Avenger when it tried to punch the kaiju).
Gipsy Avenger scales to the mega kaiju via that suicide attack, but I don't really know if that's combat applicable. Same with the kaiju's potential High 6-A feat, as it was likely a suicide move that involved being able to reach a very specific location.
This. Been wanting to do so for a while.WeeklyBattles said:We should probably fix the profiles we already have if we're making new ones
A good pointImmeasurabledissapointment said:How would the kaiju be 7A if a 1.2 megaton nuke is enough to do significant damage?
Oh, I seeWeeklyBattles said:Because the nuke has a higher demonstrated yield than 1.2 megatons
Does that mean Gipsy is actually Low 7-B due to taking a small fraction of damage from a 7-A nuke, or still the same tier?Azathoth the Abyssal Idiot said:It's like that time that the Flash saved people from a nuke in a timeframe that the author thought would require him moving at slightly under the speed of light, but the actual feat itself wasn't possible without him moving well into FTL.
In this case, the value they assumed the nuke would yield is a minimum of 100x less than it actually demonstrated.
For what it's worth, Special:RecentChanges doesn't show forum messages, just updates and who edits stuff.The Everlasting said:That feel when I'm trying to avoid spoilers but this thread keep popping up in recent activity.