- 234
- 13
What's the tier for tunneling through the moon at fast speeds?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
What's the tier for this feat?
- Thread starter UglyKittyCat238
- Start date
- 19,734
- 21,231
Depends entirely on how big the tunnel is and how fast exactly.
- 234
- 13
- Thread starter
- #3
How about average tunnel size and at massively hypersonic speedsChariot190 said:
- 10,310
- 2,780
Average? Like, cave tunnels?
- 19,734
- 21,231
Define average? And Define MHS speeds.
At that point it being a tunnel throygh the moon really doesnt matter, it's more of a how much material can one destroy per second or a KE calc. If you have an actual example I can eyeball it and give you a rough estimate, maybe do a rough calc.
At that point it being a tunnel throygh the moon really doesnt matter, it's more of a how much material can one destroy per second or a KE calc. If you have an actual example I can eyeball it and give you a rough estimate, maybe do a rough calc.
- 234
- 13
- Thread starter
- #6
16ft to be exact actuallyElixirBlue said:
- 234
- 13
- Thread starter
- #7
Tunnel is 16ft and at lighting speed.Chariot190 said:
- 10,310
- 2,780
- 19,734
- 21,231
572054306169834.6 for violent frag
1774197413338327.6 joules for pulv.
136724.26 to 424043.36 tons of tnt
High 7-C.
(Per second).
If done in one motion itd be like 1 gigaton for violent and 3-4 gigaton for pulv.
1774197413338327.6 joules for pulv.
136724.26 to 424043.36 tons of tnt
High 7-C.
(Per second).
If done in one motion itd be like 1 gigaton for violent and 3-4 gigaton for pulv.
- 234
- 13
- Thread starter
- #10
Ok thank you and to be honest I asked this question because I found one of the special moves in the injustice video game cool and wondered what tier it'll be.Chariot190 said:
- 19,734
- 21,231
So high 7-C-high 7-A. Could be higher though depending on the actual speed or characters KE.
- 234
- 13
- Thread starter
- #12
Also if done in one motion, do you mean doing it without stopping?Chariot190 said:
- 19,734
- 21,231
No I mean like done with one attack, one punch, one move, etc Although if the feat was done via a jump it'd probably count because that one jump could propel them through all that mass at one go.
If it's done through tunneling, I think we only use how much material is destroyed per second, so the first two results, I just took lightning speed (mach 1200+) and assumed the material destroyed per second was the amount lightning would move in one second plus the 16 feet diameter.
If it's done through tunneling, I think we only use how much material is destroyed per second, so the first two results, I just took lightning speed (mach 1200+) and assumed the material destroyed per second was the amount lightning would move in one second plus the 16 feet diameter.
- 234
- 13
- Thread starter
- #14
Ok thanks again for your help. Appreciate it, man.Chariot190 said:
- 234
- 13
- Thread starter
- #15
Sorry, one more question, if it's going through the moon at lighting speed how long will it take to get to the other side?Chariot190 said:
- 19,734
- 21,231
7.8275602579296236 seconds.
- 234
- 13
- Thread starter
- #17
Dang, you're smart. Alright, thanks again appreciate it.Chariot190 said:
- 10,758
- 6,501
We don't use time as a variable when making destruction calcs btw
If its a single attack, then the result will be based on the volume ultimately destroyed and if its over time, then destruction will typically be inapplicable. The results don't become higher or lower depending on the time taken
If its a single attack, then the result will be based on the volume ultimately destroyed and if its over time, then destruction will typically be inapplicable. The results don't become higher or lower depending on the time taken
