• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

What ever happened to Thor's durability feat?

3,720
1,729
I see that the MCU has gotten downgraded and all, but are we seriously completely disregarding Thor's Neutron Star feat? I've heard people say that the Neutron star losses heat and all, but isn't the neutron star being covered by a metal that is containing its heats? If the neutron star is trapped, its heat should be trapped as well.

The same would go for Hela destroying Thor's hammer as well.
 
There's also the fact that it doesn't exactly behave like a neutron star (the lack of extreme gravity, the fact that it can be re-ignited, etc.), changes size between every few shots and the fact that it could have been anything from a few Kelvin to a billion even when it was built. It's simply too unreliable to use in a calc that would scale to several characters.

The feat of destroying Thor's hammer was likely disregarded due to both problems with the calc and the fact it may have been based on being able to weather the inside of a neutron star (which we now know is no longer true about how it was forged). Low 7-B to 7-B seems to be the most consistent showing showings for the top-tiers hence the downgrade.
 
Planck69 said:
There's also the fact that it doesn't exactly behave like a neutron star (the lack of extreme gravity, the fact that it can be re-ignited, etc.), changes size between every few shots and the fact that it could have been anything from a few Kelvin to a billion even when it was built. It's simply too unreliable to use in a calc that would scale to several characters.
The feat of destroying Thor's hammer was likely disregarded due to both problems with the calc and the fact it may have been based on being able to weather the inside of a neutron star (which we now know is no longer true about how it was forged). Low 7-B to 7-B seems to be the most consistent showing showings for the top-tiers hence the downgrade.
I see, makes sense.
 
I'm Blue daba dee daba die said:
In the end,
If you want VS Matches, than you are in a bad spot, the MCU is weaker than almost everyone

But I reccomend you these characters
Nah, just wanted to know why the Neutron Star feat was disregarded, I can still think of a lot of match ups the MCU can win.
 
Back
Top