- 5,340
- 6,083
- Thread starter
- #201
No actually the near and far bit is a result of his manipulation of distance between him and his opponents having a ****** up or different perception of near and far as a result of said manipulation of distance. The crux of my argument wasn't perception manip nor does me admitting I was wrong on that part invalidate or debunk my argument I just wasn't sure how to exactly treat it.Deagon, the quote you are referring to is only relevant because it's the description given the power of infinity. Inifnity cannot be a nominal concept if its subset powers are able to manifest logical impossibilities into reality. The "near" and "far" cannot be nominal given the evidence provided how they work and where their power fundamentally stems from.
This was also blatantly outlined in the same exact scan where they discuss Gojo having control over "The scale of distance". This was tied back to OP's original argument of Infinity being perception manip which has been blatantly debunked and didn't make sense in the first place.