- 3,513
- 825
All in the title, and if the latter what changed it?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Was Outerversal always Aleph-1 Dimensional structure here or was it being beyond dimensional structures as a whole before?
- Thread starter Brogeefrong
- Start date
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,674
- 3,051
Aleph 1 is Low 1-A, Aleph 2 is 1-A. So basically, Aleph 1^aleph 1 is equal to aleph 2.
Although the standards call qualitatively superiority to aleph 1 equal to aleph 2 and 1-A, I'm not surer if qualitative superiority is comprehensive enough to make the relationship "aleph 1^aleph 1", maybe, it should be change but mehhh... So according to current standarts yeah, a dimension that completely transcends to aleph 1 would be 1-A, which is equal to aleph 2.
Although the standards call qualitatively superiority to aleph 1 equal to aleph 2 and 1-A, I'm not surer if qualitative superiority is comprehensive enough to make the relationship "aleph 1^aleph 1", maybe, it should be change but mehhh... So according to current standarts yeah, a dimension that completely transcends to aleph 1 would be 1-A, which is equal to aleph 2.
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #3
I mean like if the standard for 1-A (Low-High whatever) was always Uncountable Infinite structures or they were they just beyond dimensional structures all together before
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,674
- 3,051
This is nothing like that. By current standards, the uncountable infinite only gives you N+1. The uncountable infinite can be 5-D, Low 1-A or 10-D... It's depends on the verse and context
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #5
what i mean is did the definition for outerversal ever change, many other sites have it as Transends dimensions, and quite a bit take after vsbattlewiki, so what I'm wondering is did the definition for outerversal change for vsbattlewiki
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,674
- 3,051
Basically it comes from transcending these Low 1-A structures. But if we go a little deeper, if there is an H1-B structure in your verse and you are transcending all concepts of dimension, that is 1-A.
Or, even if there is no H1-B hierarchy in the verse, if you are in a state where "no matter how much you transcend, there will never be an end" and this goes on continuously, you transcend all concepts of dimensions in this way, that is discussed from 1-B to 1-A. But this can sometimes only add N+1 to the current cosmology
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #7
I mean did it the definition ever change, cause I vaguely remember 1-A was beyond dimension stuff
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,674
- 3,051
Transcending all countable and uncountable infinite spatial dimensions is 1-A (of course, these dimensions must be dimensions that spatially transcend each other)
Other than that, statements like "transcending all dimensions" or "transcending the all concept of dimensions" only add +1 to you in the current cosmology.
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #9
I'm not talking about becoming 1-A, I'm wondering if 1-A was once something along the lines of "beyond dimensionality" and if it eventually changed to the current definition raughhhhhhhhhh
- 20,135
- 16,817
Easiest way to check is just pick a month and jump back a year until you notice a difference in the tiers.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,674
- 3,051
Why do you think the contexts and statements I mentioned above? For nothing?
YES, IT HAS CHANGED. BEING BEYOND DIMENSIONALITY AND SOMETHING LIKE THIS BULLSHIT IS NOT ENOUGH FOR 1-A ANYMORE.
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #12
ngl i kinda just wanted a simple yes for a answer
is there a thread which changed it?
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,674
- 3,051
Vietthai96
He/Him- 9,643
- 13,282
It still the same, but more strict, most site is more lenient when treating statement such as transcend all dimesions, beyond all dimensions, transcend the concept of dimesions. While these statement can be 1-A on vsbw, it more strict and require more backup contexts
about Math thing you asked, Georr already answered
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #15
so it was never "Characters that have no dimensional limitations, and are beyond scientific definition there of."
Vietthai96
He/Him- 9,643
- 13,282
Wdym??, if you mean that these statements can be 1-A or not then yes, it can, but require extremely good contexts, them alone is insufficient
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #17
No i mean before were they accepted? Not that they are now
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #18
I'm gonna use the analogy of the a cheese burger somewhere I remembered being a dollar, but due to new circumstances it is no longer a dollar, and im asking if the burger was a dollar at a certain point
Vietthai96
He/Him- 9,643
- 13,282
Hmm, iirc, except that second statement beyond scientific definition, which back then vsbw still not use Math yet which obviously not really relevant in the past, the first statement beyond dimensional limitation kinda unknown, since back then popular statement is either transcend dimensions, space-times or transcend concept of dimensions, direction, etc....., those are popular statements, i never once encounter verse that have statement that is beyond dimensional limitation, probably i missed them, or they didn't have profiles on the site yet
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #20
can i just have a very simple yes it was or a no it wasen't answer
- 20,135
- 16,817
Like I said, just look at the history page. A two minute search and I found this from 2018
You can just follow it from there.
- 13,779
- 3,764
To answer the OP, yes, 1-A was previously just any character beyond dimensions as whole.
Vietthai96
He/Him- 9,643
- 13,282
Simplified, the first statement is unknown, the second one wasn't accepted because we don't use Math thing back then
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,674
- 3,051
Dude, it varies from context to context, but statements such as transcending all concepts of dimensions, being beyond all dimensions, or similar just add +1 to the existing cosmology without further context or statement, not enough for 1-A @Brogeefrong
- 13,779
- 3,764
He doesnt want to know about that. He is asking how things worked in the past.
Vietthai96
He/Him- 9,643
- 13,282
Eh, nowaday yes, but he ask about the past, back then about how those statements being treated
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,674
- 3,051
He asked me if this had changed, I replied that it had changed and in which thread it was changed. If he's still asking questions about this, there's nothing more I can do lol
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #28
FINALLY SOMEONE UNDERSTANDS THE QUESTION
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #29
also the thread was kinda not exactly how i was asking
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,674
- 3,051
IT WAS ALREADY IN THE THREAD I LINKED.....
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #31
that was just changing some 1-A feats into Low 1-A, not for just the entire 1-A tiers being a different definition
- 13,779
- 3,764
You linked the wrong thread, its this one.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,674
- 3,051
BRO JUST READ A LITTLE. HOW IT HAPPENED IN THE PAST IS ALREADY WRITTEN (IN THE THREAD I QUOTED)
- 3,513
- 825
- Thread starter
- #34
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,674
- 3,051
There were quotes from past standards in the title of the thread I quoted... But whatever
Similar threads
