Higher dimensions questions

[Iaakk]

So in general are higher-dimensional structures generally fulfilled by a simple "transcends dimensions," "higher dimensional" statement or something similar? Does this said transcendence have to be proved to be abstract in the sense it's an aleph 1 structure that views the structure that it transcends as flat or like a string that it can control and rip or is it that simple to get from 4D to 5D?

If not, then why and what are examples in fiction that do show 4D to 5D well?

 

[MattSatire]

So in general are higher-dimensional structures generally fulfilled by a simple "transcends dimensions," "higher dimensional" statement or something similar? Does this said transcendence have to be proved to be abstract in the sense it's an aleph 1 structure that views the structure that it transcends as flat or like a string that it can control and rip or is it that simple to get from 4D to 5D?

You can get 5D without a set theory too, the character must consider the 4 dimension below as fictional or case to case feats

If not, then why and what are examples in fiction that do show 4D to 5D well?

You can search on L1C character

 

[Iaakk]

You can get 5D without a set theory too, the character must consider the 4 dimension below as fictional or case to case feats

But in general, is 5D that abstract and not fufilled by a simple "transcending dimensions," or "higher-dimensional" statement? If so how?

 

[MattSatire]

Aleph-1 is L1-A btw

But in general, is 5D that abstract and not fufilled by a simple "transcending dimensions," or "higher-dimensional" statement? If so how?

That should include qualitative superiority, so what do you want? wouldn't an easier standard be nice rather than having to be specific that 5D has to be abstract

 

[Iaakk]

Aleph-1 is L1-A btw

That's only aleph 1 amounts of a specific structure, for instance, aleph 1 grains of sand. An aleph 1 singular structure is 5D.

That should include qualitative superiority, so what do you want? wouldn't an easier standard be nice rather than having to be specific that 5D has to be abstract

But why? Why did the TS make QS and average superiority separate definitions?