• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Very small Sakuya Izayoi addition (Touhou Project)

Funny story, I was arguing why on a video of most racist Touhou characters Remilia Scarlet should have been included, and when looking back over EOSD story translations, I saw material for a Sakuya Izayoi addition. The addition in question is Breaking the Fourth Wall / Fourth Wall Awareness. Why? She mentions trying to get you to waste a bomb, a thing in the series mechanics. Here is the proof. The source is the Touhou wiki's Embodiment of Scarlet Devil Reimu Hakurei's story translation.
Here's a sandbox with the addition.
Bonus art from the art folder too :).
 
What?

Anyways, I'll have to disagree, as bombs and spell cards are the same thing. More likely she's just referring to making Reimu waste a spell card (since faor spell card duels have an upper limit on the number of spell cards you can use).
In a YouTube shitposters server they uploaded a top 10 most racist Touhou characters video so I decided why not say something

Understandable reason to disagree. Correct me if I am wrong, but since there is no moment where a character has in a clear way referred to spell cards as bombs, and the shown image says they are used interchangeably, would a possibly be able to be settled on?
 
Understandable reason to disagree. Correct me if I am wrong, but since there is no moment where a character has in a clear way referred to spell cards as bombs, and the shown image says they are used interchangeably, would a possibly be able to be settled on?
Sure, I guess. Something like "possibly Breaking the Fourth Wall (References Reimu using bombs, a game mechanic, though bombs have been used interchangeably with spell cards at times, which are not a game mechanic)" would work.
 
Sure, I guess. Something like "possibly Breaking the Fourth Wall (References Reimu using bombs, a game mechanic, though bombs have been used interchangeably with spell cards at times, which are not a game mechanic)" would work.
I see. Changed the sandbox to that since it makes more sense. In the meantime, now to do other sandbox stuff
 
Back
Top