-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Versus Thread Removal Requests (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 15,665
- 11,794
Someone removed it already it seems.
Judgment for The Devil of Rhine: Sans VS Tanya von Degurechaff:
Both at 9-A Speed is equalized Fight takes place at the Brandenburg Gate (Berlin, Germany) Both start 20 meters from each other Fight ends in Death "Do you wanna have a Bad Time?":7 (JustANormalLemon, Stillwinston, FantaRin_The_First, TheKillerYT, MaidRips, Artorimachi_Meteoraf...vsbattles.com
Sans vs Tanya should be removed, as the fight only used the 9-A version of the latter.
As Sans is now upgraded to 9-A, Tanya lost the one shot advantage, which is her only wincon.
Fallen_Angelicx
He/Him- 2,718
- 517
Quibster
She/Her- 1,925
- 671
Requesting the removal of the match between Marisa and Asriel due to it being an objective stomp. Asriel supporters argue that he begins with a 2-B info hax nova from the outset, which Marisa cannot resist or survive. This clearly violates the thread rules that prohibit frame 1 victories from being added to profiles.
Despite this, the match was added after a FRA train, which seems to prioritize the addition of a match over addressing concerns and talking points. This is a straightforward case of procedural oversight.
Here are the affected profiles here and here.
Despite this, the match was added after a FRA train, which seems to prioritize the addition of a match over addressing concerns and talking points. This is a straightforward case of procedural oversight.
Here are the affected profiles here and here.
Last edited:
- 14,497
- 6,292
If we wanna go this route (not that I care much) is the removal of Mettaton vs Homelander.
The OP kept pushing for the possibility for Homelander being able to flip MTT and push his switch, making the latter go in his more vulnerable EX form, however, there are issues:
The OP kept pushing for the possibility for Homelander being able to flip MTT and push his switch, making the latter go in his more vulnerable EX form, however, there are issues:
- This weakness could only be exploited if the opponent knows about it, as Frisk could never know about it had it not for Alphys telling him.
- Homelander literally cannot harm Mettaton due to the latter's durability being absurdly high above his AP to the point of being completely immune to attacks comparable to his ATK
- Mettaton's AP scales to 7.430253959e+10 J, while Homelander's AP at best is 8.2043848e10 J, meaning that the gap is x1.1 (aka MTT would take minimal damage anyway)
- The entire thing about Undertale SOUL manipulation negating durability anyway, allowing MTT to kill in far less hits required than normal ones without magic, too.
- 9,862
- 3,534
I don't think AP scaling really works like that in Versus Matches?
- 14,497
- 6,292
You have a one shot scaling chain above X value, then you one shot people below or equal to X too (it was argued even here, mind u).
But that's just one of the many reasons why that fight is doodoo anyways.
Fallen_Angelicx
He/Him- 2,718
- 517
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 22,490
- 21,638
Looking into it a bit, I believe this is a fair removal. Acknowledging that there were arguments on either side, it seems to me that this is a straightforward matter.
I don't think it is a rule violation in this instance, as there were arguments on all sides and it does not fall to Strym to decide whether a match cannot be added due to being considered a stomp. However, given the prevalence of that topic in the thread's conversation, it really should have been brought to a staff member to weigh in on the matter. In the future, for those poor few who read my words, if you are faced with a thread of controversy such as this, regarding whether or not it is a stomp match (and thus can be added to a profile), do just reach out to one of us to ask. This goes for all people, not just Strym.
EDIT: I've gone ahead and removed it.
This... is significantly more dubious of a request, one feels. Arguments could be made on the matter, but really, the thread just had minimal discussion to begin with. I'll ping @Psychomaster35 to (in one message, with no followup discussion, preferably) give his thoughts on the matter on whether it is a stomp or not. Maybe hear from other staff, if possible.
Last edited:
- 14,226
- 4,338
The thing is, Homelander has a scaling chain that makes him one-shot characters scaling to the value he scales to, and there is always the possibility of him doing this by accident while punching Mettaton over and over. Also, Soul Manipulation in Undertale doesn't one-shot IIRC and it is still connected to physical durability.
- 16,033
- 10,629
Metatton soul hax requires only 4 hits to kill characters like Frisk who resist soul stuff, and even if Homelander resist a single attack I highly doubt he will be able to survive the next ones (and as I said, characters who resist soul stuff are killed with only 4 hits)
- 2,034
- 763
Just saying, unlike everybody else (well besides this smiley trashbag), Mettaton has an actual Durability Negation in his
It is accepted on his profile as of now.
- 659
- 191
bro got possessed by flowey for a second there.
- 14,497
- 6,292
- 9,862
- 3,534
It takes four hits for Frisk, Homelander is a one-shot above Frisk, soooo
- 14,497
- 6,292
I mean the fact 4 hits would be taken for characters comparable to them.
It'd still mean that MTT would take 20 hits at max to kill Homelander, as the baseline soul is assumed to have 20 HP in threads, as far as I recall.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 22,490
- 21,638
To avoid further cluttering of the thread, I'm going to say that it is my opinion that the match is probably fine to stay, even if it is a borderline case. Aside from other staff weighing in on that ruling, I consider the discussion finished.
CodeCCLL
He/Him- 2,081
- 1,016
Rimuru Tempest (Light Novel) vs Settra (Warhammer Fantasy)
It was made over 3 years ago, and Rimuru Tempest has gone through hellish content revisions since then.
It was made over 3 years ago, and Rimuru Tempest has gone through hellish content revisions since then.
CodeCCLL
He/Him- 2,081
- 1,016
Bump
Fallen_Angelicx
He/Him- 2,718
- 517
- 15,665
- 11,794
- 3,174
- 2,418
I believe these two should be removed:
I also think the Son Goku (GT) vs Son Goku (DBS Manga) match from February 2024 deserves some scrutiny. From what I can tell both Gokus have had significant revisions since then and the arguments used in the thread seem to be outdated or incorrect as the AP scaling chain used to justify Goku (GT) winning appears to give Goku (DBS Manga) a relatively very low value. For context that's Goku from the ToP with access to Ultra Instinct.
Finally Grand Priest vs Medea is from 2019 and from what I can tell Grand Priest doesn't have the loss on any of his profiles. Yet Medea's page still has the match. I believe this was an incomplete removal. And even if not the match should be completely removed due to being very outdated.
Both matches are from 2022. Goku has had many revisions since then. I believe Reinhard has also received significant revisions.I also think the Son Goku (GT) vs Son Goku (DBS Manga) match from February 2024 deserves some scrutiny. From what I can tell both Gokus have had significant revisions since then and the arguments used in the thread seem to be outdated or incorrect as the AP scaling chain used to justify Goku (GT) winning appears to give Goku (DBS Manga) a relatively very low value. For context that's Goku from the ToP with access to Ultra Instinct.
Finally Grand Priest vs Medea is from 2019 and from what I can tell Grand Priest doesn't have the loss on any of his profiles. Yet Medea's page still has the match. I believe this was an incomplete removal. And even if not the match should be completely removed due to being very outdated.
Last edited:
ReaperAndBlues
He/Him- 2,749
- 2,586
Yhwach vs Doomguy
Now look, I may seem like I'm malding, but I do believe that this match was argued in relatively poor faith. Many of the votes were FRA trains and were maintained from before he was shifted to be able to use all of his Schrifts (which is a HUGE difference from normal SK Yhwach). Doomguy before pretty much countered all of Yhwach's stuff except for having inferior LS so he could get pinned by TK, and having a weakness to fear manipulation, which was basically a stomp (I didn't exactly argue that it was because that was going to be a debate in an of itself that would ultimately derail). No one really countered my claims of resistance neg or anything
But after Yhwach gained all of his Schrifts, he gained a LOT more, including thought-based EE and Non-existence erasure, and type 8 and Mid-godly, along with resistance neg and others (which I had argued and nobody responded to). Considering this, the votes from the previous should've been reconsidered with the development of this since the difference was between a pebble and a meteor, since as per rules FRAs are usually for points that have not been countered or if a significant change had not happened, which in this case did.
Now look, I may seem like I'm malding, but I do believe that this match was argued in relatively poor faith. Many of the votes were FRA trains and were maintained from before he was shifted to be able to use all of his Schrifts (which is a HUGE difference from normal SK Yhwach). Doomguy before pretty much countered all of Yhwach's stuff except for having inferior LS so he could get pinned by TK, and having a weakness to fear manipulation, which was basically a stomp (I didn't exactly argue that it was because that was going to be a debate in an of itself that would ultimately derail). No one really countered my claims of resistance neg or anything
But after Yhwach gained all of his Schrifts, he gained a LOT more, including thought-based EE and Non-existence erasure, and type 8 and Mid-godly, along with resistance neg and others (which I had argued and nobody responded to). Considering this, the votes from the previous should've been reconsidered with the development of this since the difference was between a pebble and a meteor, since as per rules FRAs are usually for points that have not been countered or if a significant change had not happened, which in this case did.
- 3,174
- 2,418
It has come to my attention that due to a cosmology CRT, the cosmology of GT is currently treated as 3 Universes whereas the Canon cosmology is treated as 2 Universes.
So this matchup should be removed as it is now a stomp in favor of GT Goku.
- 11,277
- 10,549
Sukuna's profile
And to make it worst that Garou only lasts for some couple of chapters, he lacks a any decent feat
Ben got upgraded and most of his aliens now speedblitz and are 5-A. This should be removed
FRA train pretty much and barely any decent support for Sukuna. Theres no way that Garou could counter layared invisibility, cursed manipulation/death inducement, domain expansion that allows the user to always hit the opponent no matter what, fire arrow capable to vaporize everything within 200 meters of radius, mid regen that allows him to insta heal the body like arms or bullshit like this, and insane stamina tolerance that allows Sukuna to fight nonstop even after losing his healing powers. Man got blow up, lost more than half of his CE pool, got his body and soul disconnected little by little, lost his heart by a katana capable to ignore any substance to hit the soul, lost his arms, lost some eyes, had massive brain damage, got burned by Jacob's Ladder, and then said, "Nah, I'm barely tired" to Maki
And to make it worst that Garou only lasts for some couple of chapters, he lacks a any decent feat
It was assumed that Makima can just passively mindhax Sukuna, so its a stomp yeah
It was agreed in the end of thread. Sukuna stomps. Akame has no wincons
ReaperAndBlues
He/Him- 2,749
- 2,586
Fallen_Angelicx
He/Him- 2,718
- 517
- 14,497
- 6,292
You're obsessed lmfao.
- 11,277
- 10,549
Itadori's profile
FRA train. The only argument was "Oh yeah, agent has weapons" and thats it, ignoring the insane stamina and stats difference. No one argued for Itadori
This match is very biased (?). Its using the first key of Itadori, which barely has any feats and only lasts for less than 10 chapters, while the guy has a bunch of skill feats and precog in a 2-A scale
- 13,015
- 20,659
To quote the OP:
The following on their own do not automatically mean a match is a stomp.
The following on their own do not automatically mean a match is a stomp.
- Being a decisive match doesn't make it a stomp.
- Having a small array of hax isn't a stomp.
- Having one hax to the opponent's none, or one hax being the deciding factor doesn't make it a stomp.
- 11,277
- 10,549
I'm pretty sure that I can remove threads that basically doesn't make sense or that are very much just FRA train. No one in the thread argued for Itadori and it was "Oh, agent has weapons, ima vote for him", no supported commented or anything, its literally just a speedrun to see the match in profiles
The second one is a stomp yeah. The guy has 2-A precog. Itadori can't counter that since he even lacks decent skill feats at this point
- 13,015
- 20,659
You can't prove intent like that just because no one voted for Yuji. And if FRA trains were not allowed we'd be removing a lot of VS matches, which we don't
If you're arguing that one's a stomp, then yeah, that's another thing entirely
- 11,277
- 10,549
I'm not saying that there was any intent, I'm saying that no one argued for Itadori or any supporter have shown to argue. There was one argument and then a spam of FRA.
- 13,015
- 20,659
Still not a reason to remove the thread, though. A decisive match isn't a reason to remove a VS thread
- 11,277
- 10,549
Thats really stupid
Theres not even any way to remove that match? Because arguing there is useless at this point
Theres not even any way to remove that match? Because arguing there is useless at this point
- 13,015
- 20,659
We don't remove matches simply for being FRA trains. There wasn't any bad practice, for example. It's just that no one ended up arguing for Yuji, so unless it turns out to be a stomp, I don't see a reason to remove this
- 11,277
- 10,549
So if I make Tanjiro vs SSJB Goku, and everyone decide to vote for Tanjiro somehow, it will be added and no one will be capable to remove?
ReaperAndBlues
He/Him- 2,749
- 2,586
What in the Robo ass matchup?
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 22,490
- 21,638
I'm not entirely certain of your point. Do you intend to say that in these matchups, one character stomps the other? That is the case in this hypothetical, is it not? It is invalid for a different reason.
The fact of the matter is that matches are valid if they are not stomps and are agreed upon by consensus- so if the math isn't a stomp (egregiously obviously, in this hypothetical), then yeah, if all users agree one character wins over the other, then it would be added until rendered invalid (say, by new information coming out about one verse in the form of new episodes granting new abilities). Versus threads operate via court of public opinion, that can only be superceded should a broader "court" decide that the outcome is obviously and evidently unreasonable.
