- 15,411
- 15,766
I agree with Mitch.
and this thread too, I guess
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DisI agree with Mitch.
and this thread too, I guess
Meat riding
Call damage.Bump
noCall damage.
I mean, I am trying to be helpful, one comment from him and it settle the outcome :/
It's Damage.I mean, I am trying to be helpful, one comment from him and it settle the outcome :/
It's Damage.
He's going to disagree with it just because.
Deceived on the lookoutI'm seeing two goobers with the same pfp.
Imma start calling the both of you goober 1 and goober 2.
Evidence was found of it being larger and a CRT was already made and accepted of the larger size. It's also more than just "evidence", we have a canon size statement that is being used now instead of the previous size mentioned in the rule that was derived from calcs.As the argument for replacing it doesn't reference why the rule exists in the first place, it more or less just argues we should change the size because someone found evidence of it being larger
......No?it more or less just argues we should change the size because someone found evidence of it being larger
Evidence was found of it being larger and a CRT was already made and accepted of the larger size. It's also more than just "evidence", we have a canon size statement that is being used now instead of the previous size mentioned in the rule that was derived from calcs.
@Mr._Bambu......No?
It seems like you're misunderstanding what i'm saying in the OP, i'm not trying to remove the rule entirely or change just because we found evidence of it being larger, i'm saying we currently accept the Seireitei as another size compared to the one stated in the rule, which means it needs to be change to match our current calculation.
I linked evidence in the OP which proves it's the current, accepted calculation, hell i'll even link the verse page which has the calculation on it as well.
Deceived's heart beats whenever he engages with BleachBump
PeePeePooPooDeceived's heart beats whenever he engages with Bleach
diaper boy comment frPeePeePooPoo
Me + Arc =
Me + Arc =
That's very Homosapien of the both of you
I reread what I wrote, I don't know how you found it to "seem" like that. I'm aware of what you folks have done- you've made a CRT to change the size, and it was accepted, and now want that reflected in the rule that says "do not make CRTs to change this thing". So, personally, I find that pretty wacky, and ain't comfortable with accepting such a rule change, as it seems the rule is made explicitly to protect against that.......No?
It seems like you're misunderstanding what i'm saying in the OP, i'm not trying to remove the rule entirely or change just because we found evidence of it being larger, i'm saying we currently accept the Seireitei as another size compared to the one stated in the rule, which means it needs to be change to match our current calculation.
I linked evidence in the OP which proves it's the current, accepted calculation, hell i'll even link the verse page which has the calculation on it as well.
The new size was accepted because it brought forth new author statement information that didn't break the rule... but the rule needs to go or change regardless because it is objectively incorrect as the size isn't 509.3 km in radius anymore.I reread what I wrote, I don't know how you found it to "seem" like that. I'm aware of what you folks have done- you've made a CRT to change the size, and it was accepted, and now want that reflected in the rule that says "do not make CRTs to change this thing". So, personally, I find that pretty wacky, and ain't comfortable with accepting such a rule change, as it seems the rule is made explicitly to protect against that.
To be absolutely clear: I am fully conscious of the fact that you have this calc accepted, nobody is confused on that front, homie.
"do not make CRTs to change this thing". So, personally, I find that pretty wacky, and ain't comfortable with accepting such a rule change, as it seems the rule is made explicitly to protect against that
It seems like you missed this part of the rule.Any future revisions concerning the size of the Seireitei should wait for additional evidence from the likes of databooks, adaptations, Word of God, etc. which could affect our current understanding of the Seireitei
I understand, but I'd like you to bring me some evidence of these vague statements/that this is what it's based on (the specific thread would be excellent). I'll remind you that I am not a weebverse admin. If this is true, then I can agree to the rule being removed, though in the future I think it'd be faster to just provide this intel from the outset when dealing with one such as I, rather than presuming I hadn't read what information was provided.The rule was made in response to the multiple vague in-universe statements that gave us an idea of the size. However, they would need to be calc'd which lead to differing results and interpretations of how to accept these in-universe statements.
This is why the rule was made in the first place. We agreed to settle on one calc that seemed the most accurate.
Why this CRT is made is because a new in-universe statement actually gives us a direct size without the need to assume numbers to determine a size. We have an actual size (it is not an author statement).
The rule is now outdated, it's already contradicted by our newly accepted size from a more accurate in-universe statement that actually gave us a size.
Therefore, the rule must be removed or updated because the rule is now incorrect with our accepted size being above it.
This would be like if we had a rule that said Superman can't be above country level unless new evidence comes forth and then new evidence actually comes forth saying Superman is above country level. Do you understand now?