- 15,332
- 7,563
By waiting until one side backs down.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why'd you ask for a how many votes there are then?.Kepekley23 said:...Literally who said anything about concluding the thread based on votes again?
For once on this thread, I completely agree with you.Matthew Schroeder said:Don't use votes. Use arguments. Everyone can hire an army to say "I agree".
Completely agree with him, we are running circles here guys, the first step should be to define how a thread this controversial and debated could be resolvedDarkGrath said:@Kepekley23
This has been a major problem since 2017? I... Should there not be some kind of guideline for this process? Like, a "default" way of settling a thread if it cannot reasonably be settled otherwise?
this topic has been touched already, there is no reason to assume that the feat is planetary, it is outright stated to be universal, the fact that we only see the planet being affected is not an argument since we as players perceive the phenomenon from Dante's and Lucia's perspective and they are obviously confined to earth. Saying that this feat is planetary is lowball for the sake of lowball, it's universalSparda 20000000 said:I think we should rate them as
At least high 6-A likely 5-B possibly 3-A
Well, not really. People would be quick to call you out for that, especially here. And that's not something that is being done here either.Matthew Schroeder said:Don't use votes. Use arguments. Everyone can hire an army to say "I agree".
I understand. We have considered the idea of perhaps a compromise solution, but that might be difficult. The closest we've gotten so far for a compromise solution is "At least High 6-A, likely 5-A, possibly 3-A" and even then this solution has a lot of problems (again, unless you want me to go into detail I will not bother you more than necessary). I suppose it might be worth contacting the other bureaucrats. Thank you for getting back to me so quickly.Antvasima said:Speaking from the perspective of the one who has likely participated in the greatest amount of content revision discussions in this wiki, I regrettably think that a "case by case basis, but the staff must approve it and try to find a consensus among themselves" semi-open rule is the only way that we can handle these threads.
Given that many less popular discussions usually don't get almost any staff input, whereas other threads can potentially get swarmed by new accounts voting a certain way, and the threads otherwise differ a lot from case to case, we cannot demand a "one size fits all" policy. We have to make do as best as we can instead.
As for this specific thread, is it possible to find some sort of compromise solution?
I. VEHEMENTLY, agree with this.Sparda 20000000 said:I think we should rate them as
At least high 6-A likely 5-B possibly 3-A
It is hard to define what is "wrong" and what is "right" though. This is fiction after all. Both sides obviously believe they are right.Kepekley23 said:I disagree with a compromise. It is honestly just a Golden Mean fallacy, especially on such a dissimilar scale. I think we have to accept that sometimes, someone is just wrong, and that no compromises are needed.
^Guys, I dropped it already, quit bringing it upSchnee One said:Fine fine I'll drop it