it doesn't even do that, it's just some randoms with no authority talking about stuff
Has your opinion on the matter changed or do you still disagree with this crt?
Did you really see the counts?I think we have enough staff disagreeing with GT/movies being canon alternate timelines, so this note needs to be removed:
What other changes are needed as a result of this?
well, we would need to still solve the second point on wether or not we still would composite the cosmologies regardless of that, altho by Lephyr's point based on the evidence executor brought, we may even need a new thread to decide what would stay composited or not, aka if stuff like the 12 universe will be accepted as existing in GT or stuff like sogoruku space exists in DBS etc, overall we still have some stuff to do hereI think we have enough staff disagreeing with GT/movies being canon alternate timelines, so this note needs to be removed:
What other changes are needed as a result of this?
Frankly, I think that needs tackling in a new separate thread because this one has gone on for eight pages and we can't keep debating two topics simultaneously.
Did you? so far only 1 thread mod agreed with them being alternate timelines in canon, all the others voted for shared cosmologies and gave no vote for wheter or not they are in canon alternate timelines, along with that 2 thread mods and 2 admins voted on contrary to them being canon alternate timelines
so to see if i understood correctly, remove GT/Movies as alternate timelines and then make a new thread to cover the second topic for the shared cosmology aspect?
I don't think it's necessary, because we have more votes disagreeing with the removal than agreeing.
What? We have more votes agreeing with the removal of GT/movies as canon timelines.
If we want any kind of resolution to this instead of dragging it for weeks and another 8 pages, yeah.
Not necessarily, there were more votes and we are winning by 2
Please re-count and then explain how you go to that conclusion.
These other subjects are for another topic and not for this one.
There are multiple canon sources that contradict MWI, and the main piece of evidence provided are a 25+ year old statement from Trunks and an interview with a physicist who is unaffiliated with Dragon Ball. The description in Super takes precedence.
Antvasima seems fine with the Executioner argument, though it wants an updated summary of both parts.
the thread evolved into those 2 topics, they are very much the point of this thread now
90% of the thread has been arguing over both GT and the movies simultaneously and so were most of the votes given with that thought in mind, splitting it up last second is unfair and will only naturally result in another thread made arguing for GT's canonicity. I don't believe that you have the right to get rid of that note in such a thread.I think we have enough staff disagreeing with GT/movies being canon alternate timelines, so this note needs to be removed:
What other changes are needed as a result of this?
Go ahead, name them.
I don't know why he's rushing things, since this topic is a subject and hey Op didn't even suggest what they're doing.
Indeed we do. We should remove that note and bring this arduous discussion to an end.
For starters, five Time Rings.
Because they wanna pull a quick one and get rid of GT as if it isn't similar to the movies and holds the same arguments, before trying again to go for the movies again in another thread when everything has already been addressed in this thread. It's scummy, none of the supporters in here agree with making a split in votes between GT and the movies, it was just brought up by Omega out of nowhere half way through the thread and repeated by him over and over.
As I thought, already addressed in the thread by evidence from the anime itself. Anything else?
"last second" the division ocurred weeks ago in the 4th page of this thread, clarification on both tallies were given along this time, it was not a last second "split"
i am sorry, but a 2 weeks 8 pages long thread is somehow a "rushed thread"?
The thread has been open more than 2 weeks... This is not rushing things.
Poorly addressed. The evidence still stands firmly against MWI.
ow ow ow, what? i didn't split the movies and GT, they are in the same baggage since the summary
No. There's no need for that.
You are literally the only one that called for a division, and kept repeating it to yourself
Yes, the five Time Rings are addressed explicitly as being completely new and completely out of nowhere for the gods. What now?
Exactly, I think this is a bad attitude on Omega's part to want to disturb the crt with another subject, and Op never suggested this, all 8 pages are about what Op mentioned and what we refuted, if they want another suggestion make another thread.
Right, so poorly addressed that all you could argue back was 'I don't think so'
Again, already addressed by both the numerous other drawers, MWI, inconsistencies between the number of timelines. I'm not going on another loop with you.
