- 1,292
- 346
In the way that, whenever it is shown, Type 5 like, always contradicts itself due to exactly how it is described, and even the suggested rewording still doesn't solve this problem.
"Characters with this type of Acausality are completely independent of cause and effect, existing outside causality. Characters of this nature require evidence of being unable to be changed by any effect that relies on a system of causality, meaning that interacting with them normally is impossible."
What this still fails to solve, are Type 5s still interacting are able to fight and injure each other, even though they are suppose to "be unable to be changed by any effect that relies on a system of causality", which this would still be a causal system: Make an attack (cause) > Injure the opponent (effect)
All the other types however, don't really contradict themselves.
"Characters with this type of Acausality are completely independent of cause and effect, existing outside causality. Characters of this nature require evidence of being unable to be changed by any effect that relies on a system of causality, meaning that interacting with them normally is impossible."
What this still fails to solve, are Type 5s still interacting are able to fight and injure each other, even though they are suppose to "be unable to be changed by any effect that relies on a system of causality", which this would still be a causal system: Make an attack (cause) > Injure the opponent (effect)
All the other types however, don't really contradict themselves.