- 25,025
- 27,039
Bump
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uh no.Someone to come with a different formula to calc angular kinetic energy.
Ugarik doesn't understand how the inertia is calculated with this method.I also don't understand the way moment of inertia is calculated.
I still think ByAsura's 28-kilometer long ship calc is the most accurate approach.Was a conclusive size of the ship decided on?Not interested in the AP of the moon jump but I wanna calc Released Boros' speed
Can we use that?I still think ByAsura's 28-kilometer long ship calc is the most accurate approach.
Yeah that's 100 km/s, or 0.0003335641 times the speed of light. For a city sized ship made of steel, that's going to cause a lot of damage. Also, it's an actual mathmatical equation, so unless we're mis-using it, (which there's no evidence of), we are obligated to use it to get the most accurate result. It's clearly accounting for a factor we aren't noticing.The calc itself is an insult to logic, how can you even get Continent level results by slowly tilting a 9-kilometer wide ship?
Even if the ship was moved 100 kilometers in one second it would only get 192.27 teratons result.
You might as well try it at this point.Would this formula work to calculate the KE of the ship?
Cryo used the same formula as the other calcs.He doesn’t understand the way that it was calced in Cryo’s blog
Yes, I will give it a try.You might as well try it at this point.
Yes, but that would give you the KE of the ship. That's not the energy absorbed in the collision.Yes, it doesn't use the inflated bullet scaling, and there's a panel of Saitama side-by-side with one of the bullets and they are not that big.
@Ugarik Would this formula work to calculate the KE of the ship?
Matthew destroyed that idea long ago. I don't remember why. I can find the thread for it.Why not just scale the ship's durability from the power of Saitama's moon jump? What happened to that line of though?
Though since you back I might as well ask what you think of us scaling Saitama's moon crater to the durability of Boros' ship?I stopped getting notifications for some reason.
Is there any progress with the cloud stuff?
Well I calculated the RKE of the ship using your measurements and got this.I stopped getting notifications for some reason.
I'm not sure about Saitama ascending from the moon taking most of the energy, but atmospheric friction would do absolutely nothing to an object with that kind of velocity.Though since you back I might as well ask what you think of us scaling Saitama's moon crater to the durability of Boros' ship?
Ok.Well I calculated the RKE of the ship using your measurements and got this.
I'm waiting for Ugarik's response.One-Punch Man: Spaceship
vsbattles.fandom.com
Boros vs Thanos let's goooooooWell I calculated the RKE of the ship using your measurements and got this.
I'm waiting for Ugarik's response.One-Punch Man: Spaceship
vsbattles.fandom.com
So would that be a yes or a no to using the moon crater?I'm not sure about Saitama ascending from the moon taking most of the energy, but atmospheric friction would do absolutely nothing to an object with that kind of velocity.
Keep in mind, the mesosphere that burns up asteroids extends about 80 to 90 km above the surface. Saitama would clear that in milliseconds at this speed.
Hopefully it won't go any lower than 6-A.I just hope we don't have to recalc the moon crater or else I may legit have to fold someone
It's currently High 6-A, or 44 petatons. Still High 6-A Boros. Just MUCH lowerHopefully it won't go any lower than 6-A.
A recent one I saw got 63.33 petatons, but it isn't evaluated yetIt's currently High 6-A, or 44 petatons. Still High 6-A Boros. Just MUCH lower
That calc looks very well made, and the math and logic seems to check out from a glance. Hopefully it can be evaluated soon.A recent one I saw got 63.33 petatons, but it isn't evaluated yet
I just realized. That calc wasn't even accepted , unless it was accepted someplace else.It's currently High 6-A, or 44 petatons. Still High 6-A Boros. Just MUCH lower
It was IIRCI just realized. That calc wasn't even accepted , unless it was accepted someplace else.