- 24,976
- 26,824
Only in the armored section. I think we should link it in the released section as wellThe ship is already linked to his profile, but alright
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only in the armored section. I think we should link it in the released section as wellThe ship is already linked to his profile, but alright
That's because the vertical impact tilted it. It did **** all to the ship's armour (although there's some secondary explosions that cause light damage and came after the ship hit the ground), whereas one blow from Boros does this and this.Are you seriously scaling Boros to the strength of a ship that was in critical condition and began to fall after Saitama's jump?
That I'm neutral on, and leaning towards agreement. Causing secondary explosions from the impact against the ground is probably >> destroying some of the ship's systems over time and a door.Do you really scale the strength of the door in the Boros hall to the strength of the entire ship and jump?
You brought it up already, and it was immediately debunked.Why didn't any of you come up with the idea that this is a ******* sur?
Was that agreed upon here?You forgot to remove the Orochi scaling and also, link the ship to Boros' profile
You mean the heroes who thought that Tatsumaki brought it down? They're obviously just making assumptions based on the fact that part of it was tilting. Proof of that is when they have to ask if it's falling as Boros prepares the CSRC.The fact that the ship began to fall after the jump is noted by the heroes on the page that you yourself threw off.
I didn't say that was dispelled, I said the gravity core argument was.When was it dispelled the idea that scaling the strength of a door to the strength of a ship is stupid?
Proof? Also, we have a fair number of users and a member of the calculation team.This is a separate thread. We had a fair number of users, and as far as I remember even a member of the calculation team, who agreed that Boros should not scale. Well, a number of users who had the opposite opinion. Discussion of this was delayed as we thought the ship's strength calculation for a High 6-A result (within exatons) and we could scale Boros to his exploits, but this has been dispelled.
I don't understand what proof you are asking for.You mean the heroes who thought that Tatsumaki brought it down? They're obviously just making assumptions based on the fact that part of it was tilting. Proof of that is when they have to ask if it's falling as Boros prepares the CSRC.
Why would this alien say the ship is going down after the gravity core was shattered if it actually happened before the gravity core was shattered?
I didn't say that was dispelled, I said the gravity core argument was.
Proof? Also, we have a fair number of users and a member of the calculation team.
That's kind of the reason this thread exists? We were gonna make Boros 6-A because the Orochi scaling was yeeted, but people had problems with the 6-A calcWas that agreed upon here?
I missed a lot, why was high 6-C an option?That's kind of the reason this thread exists? We were gonna make Boros 6-A because the Orochi scaling was yeeted, but people had problems with the 6-A calc
FTL stuff or some shit. Someone tried, but then it got nuked because it'd go FTL.Propably a necro, but what's wrong with conservation of angular momentum method?
May I ask you for some advice on another calculation?Propably a necro, but what's wrong with conservation of angular momentum method?
SureMay I ask you for some advice on another calculation?