-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Tier 1 Review Thread
- Thread starter Promestein
- Start date
-
- Tags
- tiering system
- 2,650
- 467
I feel as though I should mention an update I made to one of my existing Tier 1's, Florous. I gave them the tier, "N/A," signifying that they are incapable of affecting any realities outside of their own in any way. If this is a problem, I can change it back to, "At most 11-C". However, a page on VBW was recently changed to have this rating, and as such, I have added it to a new category for "N/A Tier," characters.
- 8,308
- 1,696
@Anty
You kinda have to say how many dimensions it embodies. " All the dimensions " could be anything in the tier 1 range.
You kinda have to say how many dimensions it embodies. " All the dimensions " could be anything in the tier 1 range.
- 8,308
- 1,696
I agree @Aeyu... I was just expecting it to be in the tier 1 range.. but it can range from tier 2 to tier 1 .
- 33,408
- 8,430
Basically you need to specify. The requirements for tier 1 in general is on the Tiering System page.
- 11,582
- 549
Heh.
- 4,914
- 420
Embodies infinite dimensions that's what you need is to say
- 8,675
- 5,560
- Thread starter
- #252
Don't make so many posts. Keep it in a single post, you're clogging this thread.
- 11,582
- 549
^Yep
- 724
- 50
Just wondering how Densetsu qualifies as a High 1-C/Low 1-B when unrestricted.
- 555
- 118
Give a much more valid reason for the 1-A rating.
- 21,783
- 4,826
you are scaling him from a bunch of people who don't exist yet
- 555
- 118
Simply expand on how he is a 1-A because it still leaves a lot to the mind on how even when "Unknown" that he could somehow possibly be 1-A.
- 724
- 50
sorry if i sound like a bother but what about my character?
- 555
- 118
No worries about it you don't,the page seems fine for the most part.
- 295
- 23
Dicey, you are not bothering. Everyone is free to be a part of the thread as long as it is about qualification on the tiers, from what i read about the thread anyway.
oh and AkuAkuAkuma, so... first i think of feats that can make him 1-A rateable? My god, i didnt know how diffucult it is to prove a character qualifiable for a certain tier. I mean after High 1-C everything becomes so confusing to me.
oh and AkuAkuAkuma, so... first i think of feats that can make him 1-A rateable? My god, i didnt know how diffucult it is to prove a character qualifiable for a certain tier. I mean after High 1-C everything becomes so confusing to me.
- 555
- 118
Not feats. You have to above all spatial dimensions or something similar in definition in order to classified as such, it's not that hard of a task.
- 32,358
- 20,298
- 555
- 118
Fascinating, simply fascinating.
- 11,582
- 549
'''Big Fat Ass gap''' if i do say so myself. 
- 21,783
- 4,826
>Tremendous and maybe infinite
smh
smh
- 724
- 50
lmao oh my christMatthew Schroeder said:
- 1,449
- 179
- 1,449
- 179
^ the wielder of this book can also be High 1-A right?
- 32,358
- 20,298
I don't think either match the standards required.
- 1,449
- 179
They both view infinite dimensions and beings that are beyond those concepts as fictionMatthew Schroeder said:
- 1,449
- 179
^ all concepts as fictions*
- 33,408
- 8,430
Well for one the number of bytes are not suffiient.
