• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Tier 1 & 0 Review Thread

I still don't really think that the Dragon Ball RWBY pages really do enough as far as Fan Fiction on this wiki goes, but this is really minor and just direct canon scaling so it's fine.
 
I still don't really think that the Dragon Ball RWBY pages really do enough as far as Fan Fiction on this wiki goes, but this is really minor and just direct canon scaling so it's fine.
Yeah its a mix of the Super Anime and Manga that takes details and events from both into its own separate Continuity

So the hypertime would of course still be there
 
Some of this scaling seems, a bit strange. I'll comment about it later
This thread is for FC/OC staff to evaluate Tier 1/0 cosmology submissions, not for random members to make unnecessary comments about them. Please leave it out of the thread.

As for Thrawn, we'd have to discuss about your submission further later and some of the comments I've made beforehand in the server also need to be addressed with more elaboration as well.
 
After our review, Tanz's Imaginary Tavern has been accepted. Up to 1-A.

Congratulations. I was very shocked by this submission. A completely new user just came in and delivered.

Just goes to show this really isn't as hard as people think. Don't be afraid, guys!
... Did I miss something?

That blog is pretty neat in its own right, but it doesn't provide any narrative importance to the concepts entailing Tier 1.

In fact, the fact you can only tell it even is a Tier 1 submission by the exact ending where it throws out random buzzwords that fall under that sphere, everything is about the nature of a multiverse is real and that there's a void in-between each universe made of thoughts conceivable and inconceivable, none of that requires infinite dimensions to exist, or in such a fashion to even apply to Tier 1 rather than just being alternate spatial axises. It even implies "dimension" is primarily used as another word for universe or Paracosm, as all of them are listed as synonymous with one another rather than distinguishing the importance of dimension.
 
That blog is pretty neat in its own right, but it doesn't provide any narrative importance to the concepts entailing Tier 1.
Narrative importance does not need to be in the cosmology blog. In fact, typically it only serves to make the blog more cluttered and confusing.

This is fine since the whole point of our review over discord is to go over the actual reasons this stuff is in the story.

Tanz was very willing to actually explain his story to us and how the things he wrote here relates to it.
In fact, the fact you can only tell it even is a Tier 1 submission by the exact ending where it throws out random buzzwords that fall under that sphere, everything is about the nature of a multiverse is real and that there's a void in-between each universe made of thoughts conceivable and inconceivable, none of that requires infinite dimensions to exist, or in such a fashion to even apply to Tier 1 rather than just being alternate spatial axises. It even implies "dimension" is primarily used as another word for universe or Paracosm, as all of them are listed as synonymous with one another rather than distinguishing the importance of dimension.
I'm not sure what you mean. The stuff at the very end going over the tiering was just my summary of what was on the page. That was specifically written to make it extremely obvious why this is Tier 1.

When I read this blog, it was very clear to me this was a Tier 1 submission.

And upon talking with the user the intent of this stuff is even more clear.

I'd also like to mention that Tanz seems to be extremely new to powerscaling. And to me his writing here seems to reflect that. It isn't over reliant on the jargon you typically see, yet I could still see exactly what he was getting at.

Anyway, I would very much prefer if you and other people didn't butt into this. Please, respect the decision.
 
Last edited:
I don't even know what is Tier 1 about this.
Okay, it’s really hard to explain, but to put it simply: These are beings transcend the infinite 4 dimensional space of the Get A Snack multiverses (yes, plural, each game is a separate one, though they are all connected via a macrocosm of sorts), and certain characters in the verse are capable of harming and even killing some of these beings.
 
Okay, it’s really hard to explain, but to put it simply: These are beings transcend the infinite 4 dimensional space of the Get A Snack multiverses (yes, plural, each game is a separate one, though they are all connected via a macrocosm of sorts), and certain characters in the verse are capable of harming and even killing some of these beings.
Since this appears to be an actual game, do you have scans?
 
Since this appears to be an actual game, do you have scans?
Okay, here’s some of the stuff for proof there’s a multiverse and they can delete stuff, they make more sense in context though. I’ll try finding the 5-D stuff and more, but this is a small part of it. Also, some of it is creator statements, so I’ll try to find those too.
some of the stuff
 
Okay, here’s some of the stuff for proof there’s a multiverse and they can delete stuff, they make more sense in context though. I’ll try finding the 5-D stuff and more, but this is a small part of it. Also, some of it is creator statements, so I’ll try to find those too.
some of the stuff
Please just tell me once you have everything. Link it to the blog.
 
Please just tell me once you have everything. Link it to the blog.
Big Problem. The creator’s twitter account was archived, and that’s where the majority of the Low 1-C stuff if not all of it was. You can see the 2-B and 2-A stuff at least. There should be some of the evidence for the stuff I talked about though, just not all of it.
 
Okay so, for one, if there was only Twitter statements for this stuff, it would've never been accepted on here regardless.

That basically just auto-fails the narrative reasoning requirement, because that stuff wasn't even directly involved in the narrative in the first place.

As for 2-B / 2-A, not really why thread for that but I don't even see evidence of that either. I haven't seen a scan of there being infinite realities.
 
Okay so, for one, if there was only Twitter statements for this stuff, it would've never been accepted on here regardless.

That basically just auto-fails the narrative reasoning requirement, because that stuff wasn't even directly involved in the narrative in the first place.

As for 2-B / 2-A, not really why thread for that but I don't even see evidence of that either. I haven't seen a scan of there being infinite realities.
1: Okay, I said most, not all. 2: They were answering questions people had about the game’s story, so it was more clarification of the plot than creating random stuff. 3: 2-B/2-A stuff, sure you can say no. I don’t really care there anyways.
 
Okay so, for one, if there was only Twitter statements for this stuff, it would've never been accepted on here regardless.

That basically just auto-fails the narrative reasoning requirement, because that stuff wasn't even directly involved in the narrative in the first place.

As for 2-B / 2-A, not really why thread for that but I don't even see evidence of that either. I haven't seen a scan of there being infinite realities.
Anyways, yeah okay. I’m starting to think I’m going insane. Anyways, thanks for the help with the scaling, I really don’t understand this stuff. If you want, I can change the scale on Player’s page.
 
Going to clarify a few things, because I realized people might not understand the current process.

1. Evaluation is not being done on here anymore. In the beginning of the thread, it was done that way, but we decided to instead bring it onto the Discord for more privacy and less clutter on here. It's also a more convenient medium that allows us to go deeper into a conversation.

However, if the submission is blatantly not up to standard, or if it's simple enough, we may give a verdict on this thread immediately. This has happened before.

2. Although "Narrative Justification" is a requirement, it doesn't need to be explained or showcased on the cosmology blog itself. It can be, but that's not a necessity. And it often makes for more bloated and confusing explanations, anyways. It's fine if you don't include it there. When the evaluation is done, we will go over it thoroughly regardless.

3. Even if you are accepted on this thread, your future character profiles and revisions may impact the eligibility of your verse. Especially if there are any differences or changes in scaling noticeable on the pages. Remember that you will be held to a much higher standard overall, and your acceptance may be revoked at any point in time.

4. If you're going to index a verse based on something online (whether it be a fan fiction, a game, video, etc) please utilize scans for the scaling, so that we can actually verify the work is Tier 1 in the first place. If you don't have those it will be significantly harder to get that work accepted.
 
I will add to the above post and mention that this thread should be treated like VSBs Rule Violation Reports thread as in it's NOT an open invitation for everyone to make comments. Why people couldn't pick up on that without being told, I don't know. Unless you're submitting, or responding to a staff question, you cannot comment here.
 
Back
Top