Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ever still gets a say on Kingdom Hearts and Final Fantasy scaling. Despite the grotesque actions he was banned for.Hellbeast1 said:Wait what's this with Ever?
Well yeah. If people want to present the opinions of a banned member that's okay, as long as that presentation doesn't otherwise break the rules. And if people in the thread find those points legit, they can listen to them.AogiriKira said:Ever still gets a say on Kingdom Hearts and Final Fantasy scaling. Despite the grotesque actions he was banned for.
1. Having too many pages due to our staff's pitiful unwillingness to cull the number of pages in favor of our popularity and fear of workload. We value quantity over quality. |
2.Having too many CRTs to manage our 25k pages. The vast majority of CRTs nowadays are upgrades, proving that the community at large values the most consistent high-ball. |
4. Powerscaling being abused as well. A good deal of powerscaling is now hardly from if a character can consistently compete with whom they scale to, but if there's any minute statement to back it up. |
5. Having too many staff members despite only a few actually doing what they are positioned for, and some having admittedly lost interest (just retire then). Having this many staff is unneeded as mass editing is a community effort or can be done by bots. Despite not needing over 70 staff, we still do. |
6. The staff having lost their ability to assume good faith in regular members due to the scars of our past filled with vandalism and trolling, and since the staff are the "trusted members" this leaves the community at large feeling invalid in comparison, due to having not as important enough input in a discussion. |
7. The schism between the staff and community continuously prolongs the inflation of our stats and pages, and thus our unreliability increases. |
8. The community over-emphasizing higher tiers, as evidenced with the new system not actually being implemented in such a way that solves the inflation problem despite being marketed as "objective and mathematically accurate". We also over-emphasize philosophical mumbo jumbo that sounds impressive and try to use that as evidence for these higher tiers. 1-A Platonic concepts dozens of types of powers that really aren't that complicated come to mind. |
3. Calculations (arguably one of the best tools at our disposal) are not checked and reviewed as they are supposed to be. Most calcs I've seen recently just get an "this looks okay" from normal members and staff that aren't even calc members. |
Their actions were criticized by Sera. Being unbecoming and having nepotism for each other is also known as not having faith in non-staff. They don't have faith so they put each other above non-staff. They don't have faith so they treat non-staff badly.KnightOfSunlight said:By far the asbolute worst possible representation of what I've said.
I did not once criticize the staffs faith in the community. I criticized their actions, specifically the ones in which the have acted unbecoming of how staff should be expected to act, and I criticized the nepotism staff have for each other.
Did you even read the post?
No... no it isn't. Whether it is too high or too low, inaccurate is inaccurate. This is just what I brought up in my comment. It is just a bad that a character be downplayed as it would be if they were wanked. Stuff like this is one of the most flagrant and inherent biases seen on this wiki and in debating in generalSchnee One said:Of course we are, Low Balled results are safer
Why would a statistic being too low be any better than it being too high? If they are inaccurate than they are inaccurate. Neither direction is more "safe" than the otherDarkDragonMedeus said:Low balled results are usually safer. If they have multiple feats, it;s usually high end feats that are more scalable. But if a calc has multiple results, it's usually the low end that's safer.