The Walter Simonson, Dan Jurgens, J.M. Straczynski, and Al Ewing runs are of very high quality, and Tom DeFalco wrote Thor with respect and as a fundamentally nice person, so that run is also largely quite enjoyable.
Thank you very muchThe Walter Simonson, Dan Jurgens, J.M. Straczynski, and Al Ewing runs are of very high quality, and Tom DeFalco wrote Thor with respect and as a fundamentally nice person, so that run is also largely quite enjoyable.
I'm actually quite a big fan of the DeFalco run. I like Eric Masterson, and all the stuff with the High Evolutionary was pretty cool.The Walter Simonson, Dan Jurgens, J.M. Straczynski, and Al Ewing runs are of very high quality, and Tom DeFalco wrote Thor with respect and as a fundamentally nice person, so that run is also largely quite enjoyable.
I'll admit that I'm not as personally knowledgeable on Thor's character in the comics then it should be, but I do understand why you wouldn't like that since you've read a lot of Thor comics in the past.
Forgive my ignorance, Ant, but isn't that always Thanos' deal in the comics? Again I'm not a comic buff, but I thought the general basis of Thanos' character is that he's a nihilist constantly earning for Lady Death's attention. I mean that's why he gathered the Infinity Gauntlet initially in the comics IIRC.
I can respect that mentality, to be honest. I mean even if you don't like his writing, he doesn't sound like a bad dude in real life and I felt bad when I learned he developed amnesia in 2022 after a car accident.That said, he has been through absolute hell on a personal level, so I feel sorry for him about that. I just do not care for his writing.
Yes, but a theme of "Thanos wins and does lots of absolutely horrible things, and let's turn him into even more of a Gary Stu than he already is", is not something that I enjoy.
Yes. If I remember correctly, he received severe brain damage, was in a coma for 6 months, his fiancée left him, and he had to work extremely hard to rehabilitate himself. Okay, so he turned Thor into an asshole and a very bad friend, and did a very poor job with handling both the Hulk and Loki, and destroyed Thor's beloved town of Broxton for no good reason, and did some really twisted Carnage and Thanos work, but that just meant that I thought he was a largely destructive writer (but very far from the worst ones I have encountered), not that I wanted him to suffer personally,
I can understand that sentiment, to be honest. From my understanding, it doesn't sound like Thanos is as interesting or as entertaingly intimidating as someone like Darkseid (which I know is a very popular take, but Thanos' creation was inspired by Darkseid so that was the easiest comparison to make)
Oh no, I totally understand what you're trying to say. You're saying that you don't like his writing but you don't wish harm upon him nor are you saying he's a inherently bad person, so I respect that you can separate your preferences from judging the character of the writer in question(But I'm not going to lie: his fiancee must've been a horrible person if she left him after he was in a car accident which left him amnesiac, Donny honestly dodged a bullet there.)
Seemed reasonable given how timelines work I mean there were several ascension events involving Nathaniel in separate timelines and one unsuccess didn't deter the others.
I'm in the works with someone. I might know of a way to get Marvel back to High 1-A.
So cool
Just a note that we should not strive for the highest tiers possible with unreliable justifications, but rather the most reliable tiering.
Yes, I wouldn't be saying that if there weren't justification.Just a note that we should not strive for the highest tiers possible with unreliable justifications, but rather the most reliable tiering.
Okay. Just make certain that it is very reliable and sufficiently consistent please.
Shouldn't the feats in bold just be considered LS feats?
The first is already general used as both LS and AP. The second one, depending on Eseseso's project, would be used as LS and AP
Yes I know, my question is actually why is this considered an AP feat?
You got me interested where did you took the Marvel atlas from? I wanna see what's there
Thank you
From what I remember, Enchantress isn't much stronger than an average Asgardian without converting magic into strength. She's not the most consistent character, but has harmed She-Hulk during Secret Wars, and taken hits from Blastaar, Sunspot and Wonder Man.
Just search up '"marvel atlas" read online', including the quotes around Marvel Atlas, and you'll see it.
I mean yeah but that was rejected before even if Doom needed the Cosmic Power Siphon on Annihilus just to use the rod at it’s true potential, the rod also has a Smurf feat of absorbing the power of child Franklin Richards before Annihilus got interrupted
That's been something I've been trying to determine, since I'm wanting to make profiles for the Warriors Three, Sif, Karnilla, and Balder. Bare minimum they are 5-B, but imo they can reasonably scale to 3-C. Balder could fight against Ares during Siege, and imo Ares is closer to Thor and Hercules than he is to the 5-Bs.
What's Loki's 1-A magic feats again?
Is there also a profile or an explanation blog for Yggdrasil planned?
