- 5,879
- 1,069
Ok, but those don't apply to Dragonair
Quantify how strong a level 100 perfect IV EV Pokemon is
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The long awaited and great Pokemon upgrades
Quantify how strong a level 100 perfect IV EV Pokemon is
- 15,587
- 10,499
- Thread starter
- #44
Strictly speaking, yeah, the only real reason why our pokemon profiles are wild is so that they don't depend on a trainer, but rather act naturally. If we're being honest, perfect IVs and EVs are onlyy achievable with intense training. Our profiles are supposed to be the cream of the crop, perfect pokemon without a trainer. This indeed suggests that a random dragonair who's level 55 or so isn't superior to a lvl 100 perfect IV EV dragonair
- 6,176
- 2,338
It’s the same species, same learnset, the only difference is one has 45 less levels, and likely doesn’t have near The same amount of iv/ev training done. There’s no way it could out muscle at that point. Maybe it could win with a lucky dragon type move and assume the wild one misses, but that’s not indicative of their strength.
GodlyCharmander
He/Him- 5,744
- 4,996
God and Steak makes sense to me.
The Lv 55 imperfectly trained Dragonair isn't superior to a Lv 100 Perfect Dragonair.
It's not even possible, because our Dragonite has full EVs, something not possible for your average Dragonair. (because "Perfect EVs" aren't a thing, it depends on their spread and moveset, and given how our Dragonite can learn every conceivable move...)
The Lv 55 imperfectly trained Dragonair isn't superior to a Lv 100 Perfect Dragonair.
It's not even possible, because our Dragonite has full EVs, something not possible for your average Dragonair. (because "Perfect EVs" aren't a thing, it depends on their spread and moveset, and given how our Dragonite can learn every conceivable move...)
- 12,552
- 2,508
Technically speaking, perfect EVs were possible in generations 1 and 2 where this manga was set. AVs (awakening values) are also a thing for trained Pokemon, introduced in LGPE.
- 14,110
- 11,056
That is LITERALLY a core concept of Pokemon, to further that, the manga actually gives the levels of every pokemon of the main dex holders at the start of each volume, specifically to catalog the growth of strength of the pokemon in question. Secondly, Yellow, the main character of the arc, has a gimmick where she can control the levels of Pokemon, which directly weakens and powers them up. A lv60 Dragonair one tapping a lv20 pika for example is perfectly fine and within the realm of reason.
As for the OP, I do think we shouldn't scale every base pokemon to Rhyhorn, at least, not 1:1, it does state it is immensely powerful, even if you want to say that is only for base pokemon, that still means in the realm of base pokemon, it's way stronger than the rest. If we actually scale, I'd say slap an "At most" onto the other base pokemon scaling to this feat, especially because it's like 10x higher than being proposed here.
- 15,587
- 10,499
- Thread starter
- #49
How about this then
At most Low 7-B | At least Low 7-B, likely 7-B | High 7-A
how does this sound? Base pokemon scale only to 1 megaton. 2nd stages to 2x the power of rhydon and above the dragonair feat to 7-B+
- 15,587
- 10,499
- Thread starter
- #50
to be fair pika was like in its 40s. Still, a lvl 55 hyperbeam to the face of a pokemon that isn't even evolved would one-shot it, Pika was never good with defense, only with offense
- 14,110
- 11,056
Better than nothing, though technically, the feat is V.Frag, unsure how you wanna go about that or if it's still scalable after the fact.
- 15,587
- 10,499
- Thread starter
- #52
wdym? Shattering a mountain without further context is frag. The minimum energy to fragment a mountain is 1.45 megatons
- 14,110
- 11,056
Destroying a mountain with further context is frag, they state it shatters the mountain though, shattering is v.frag.
- 15,587
- 10,499
- Thread starter
- #54
shattering it to small pieces is vfrag. For all we know with the japanese translation it says "break" "destroy" "smash", meaning that it isn't exactly shatter and it is definitely not enough context for vfrag
- 14,110
- 11,056
Then check the raw, if it says those or doesn't specify we'd go with frag as the raw would supersede the eng text, but as it stands, shatter implies v.frag.
- 8,797
- 3,040
Log scale?
Also, I think I'm with @Arceux0x about the Dragonair matter.
Agreed.
I don't mind this.
- 12,552
- 2,508
I still feel like the 1 megaton thing is kinda arbitrary. Drifloon's feat is less than 2x Rhyhorn's, wouldn't it make sense to work that into the scaling? For instance, "At least High 7-C, likely Low 7-B".
Logarithmic, there's an illustration on the attack potency page.
Anyway, @QuasiYuri @ElixirBlue @SamanPatou @Starter_Pack @Shadowbokunohero, thoughts?
- 13,314
- 3,661
About time this happened! I agree with this.
- 15,587
- 10,499
- Thread starter
- #61
i mean, what's the point? Not to mention, some issues could arise with the feat, i already told you which ones.
Like i said, there's no real reason not to scale them to Low 7-B, scaling them below is also arbitrary. Many pokemon are described as strong, however Rhyhorn isn't described as 'stronger' than everyone else, making the scaling you're suggesting an assumption
- 15,587
- 10,499
- Thread starter
- #62
thanks a lot!
- 3,881
- 1,113
I agree with everything here
- 15,587
- 10,499
- Thread starter
- #64
i was busy with a project. got a good grade for it and now i'm vibin', thus i had time to make this. It was originally planned earlier but dates changed and i decided to postpone it.
But hey, at least this isn't SMT where we wait for months for upgrades
GodlyCharmander
He/Him- 5,744
- 4,996
Would you guys be okay if Second stages were full-on 7-B? The Dragonair was Lv 54 at best, and had imperfect IVs/EVs, so its 7-B feat should scale to a perfect IV/EV Lv 100 Mid-Stage.
- 8,797
- 3,040
I would also be comfortable with this.
I'll need to remember to look into that.
Plus the feat/calc needs to be moved from Amelia's comment in Cal's blog so it can be published to an actual blog so it can be evaluated.
Still, using an actual feat's yield as a benchmark instead of an arbitrary Baseline Point does seem reasonable, IMHO.
On the other hand Baseline would be a median between Drifloon & Rhyhorn.
But I doubt Drifloon was that casual using a powerful, self-destruction move like Explosion. So it was probably somewhat serious & near the upper end of feats for Pokemon of that stage.
If it wasn't fully trained, far from max level in a canon where levels are actually indicative of Power Level, then it would make sense that very powerful 2nd Stages could be above it, I think.
Last edited:
GodlyCharmander
He/Him- 5,744
- 4,996
I think you meant "fully trained", given the context of your message.
Either way, it's quite far from being as strong as a Lv 100 Dragonair with perfect IVs, and given how most 2nd stages scale to it, I'd think it's fair. 7-B seems fine, imo.
If you also agree with it, then I'll try gathering input from some other members.
GodlyCharmander
He/Him- 5,744
- 4,996
Would you guys be okay with 7-B 2nd stages given the points Arceus and I made above?
Popted2
He/Him- 8,550
- 4,445
how megatons they would be?
- 15,587
- 10,499
- Thread starter
- #70
45.88 as it is in the calc. Though depending on people's suggestion we could upscale to 50
Popted2
He/Him- 8,550
- 4,445
okay i understand, i agree with you and Charmander
- 15,587
- 10,499
- Thread starter
- #72
well i am neutral on the matter. If others consider this viable then i will too.
- 12,552
- 2,508
The stuff about the lack of destruction? It's still usable, the explosion method is meant for scenarios like that.
Huh? There's a feat at High 7-C+, that's not arbitrary at all, certainly not more arbitrary than selecting 1 megaton as a benchmark. Either we don't downscale or we downscale to Drifloon's very close feat. Though I don't see the problem in scaling any first stage Pokemon also described as 'strong' to Rhyhorn directly anyway.
I mean, does anything else back Dragonair being level 54 or below other than assuming it would have evolved into Dragonite otherwise? Some trainers prefer not to evolve their Pokemon when they get a chance, hell even Lance himself had two overlevelled Dragonairs in RBY (which is weirdly ironic). Granted that's an assumption as well, and otherwise there shouldn't be any issue really with scaling a no-name trainer's Dragonair to peak 2nd stages. I'm neutral either way, but it should be fine to scale 2nd stages to 7-B in some capacity at the very least.
- 8,797
- 3,040
Scaling to Drifloon or Rhyhorn's feat or between them seems reasonable to me.
The Dragonair in question is from the manga. As has already been brought up in the thread, in the Manga's canon, preventing a Pokemon's Evolution requires a Pokedex, which this Dragonair's trainer(s) did not have.
Thus, if its level became high enough to evolve, that Dragonair's evolution COULDN'T have been prevented, because its trainers lacked the means to do so.
At least, that's how I understand it.
- 3,881
- 1,113
Yes I do agree with it
GodlyCharmander
He/Him- 5,744
- 4,996
That's correct, yes.
GodlyCharmander
He/Him- 5,744
- 4,996
That sounds reasonable to me.
- 12,552
- 2,508
- 13,314
- 3,661
Pretty good to me as well
Similar threads
