Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This was something that confused me at first when I was still doing all of my (re)research on the verse and its cosmology...until I ran into this quote from DT7, which I hadn't given much thought the first time I saw it, but is a key to understanding the whole Rose thing in general:Xulrev said:@King Well that leaves simply my point of The Rose, itself an explicit nexus of reality for the entire DT multiverse, existing within the Tower. If that doesn't make it Tier 0 then I will absolutely bow out and retract my point.
There was a pause during which those gathered in that place considered the idea. Then Feemalo said, almost apologetically: "The cost might not be so great if one were just to consider this world, which we might call Tower Keystone, since the Dark Tower exists here not as a rose, as it does on many, or an immortal tiger, as it does on some, or the ur-dog Rover, as it does on at least one—" "A dog named Rover?" Susannah asked, bemused. "Do you really say so?" "Lady, you have all the imagination of a half-burnt stick," Fumalo said in a tone of deep disgust. Feemalo paid no heed. "In this world, the Tower is itself.'' | ||
~ The Dark Tower |
Superiority over an endless hierarchy of such things as a low end, for example? However, if at the present time even one level of such transcendence (and the status of the in-universe supreme being) is enough to get tier 0, then why not. In any case, I advocated the abolition of this tier itself.Kepekley23 said:There's no level of transcendence greater than viewing something as fiction, so if viewing a 1-A as literally nonexistent is not 0, what could even possibly be rated as 0, to be fair?
There it will be easier to remove this part from the definition Tier 0:Antvasima said:Perhaps we have been too lenient regarding assigning some tier 0 ratings?
Okay. I am not sure how to properly solve this then. I would prefer to keep our current strict requirements for tier 0, and not let in characters like Haju, but at the same time, there is a massive distinction between certain characters in the tier, if we could manage to properly define it, preferably with the help of yourself, Azathoth, Sera, and Assaltwaffle.DarkLK said:Almost none of the active editors (who cactually reate high-tier pages) seriously think about "how far this character is in 1-A" or something like that. I do not see any reason to split tier 0 (which is a continuation of 1-A). This simply will not work.
Yes. You are correct.MrKingOfNegativity said:I'm not huge on this sort of stuff either. It's why I stay away from 1-A matches.
Like I said though, I think the discussion (if it happens) is best had some other time. This thread really isn't the place for it.
1-A matches are so terrible just because those who are not huge on this sort of stuff in fact don't stay away from them.MrKingOfNegativity said:I'm not huge on this sort of stuff either. It's why I stay away from 1-A matches.
DarkLK said:1-A matches are so terrible just because those who are not huge on this sort of stuff in fact don't stay away from them.