- 2,627
- 1,736
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uhuh. Well, I also don’t get the whole Marvel/DC comparison though as ultimately it was officially approved and have several decades of history that involves comics and other specifically approved media that is also technically copyrighted at this point as well being adored and/or known by the general public from the US and rest of the world (well for some time before the modern days as it is a mixed bags in more modern times) so ultimately I don’t exactly agree with Agnaa as at some point, we really need to find something that should not cross the line further than it already hasThis was quick.
No, we don't allow JBW to be used as a "backup" for serious profiles anymore. JBW is a joke profile wiki, we delete profiles that don't fit that category now. We aren't going to accept SCP profiles. They're gonna have to go into blogs or sandboxes.Bro wanted them interactions.
Anyway JBW got y'all covered
My point is not "SCP is exactly the same as Marvel and DC, and so if one gets deleted, the others should too!"Uhuh. Well, I also don’t get the whole Marvel/DC comparison though as ultimately it was officially approved and have several decades of history that involves comics and other specifically approved media that is also technically copyrighted at this point as well being adored and/or known by the general public from the US and rest of the world (well for some time before the modern days as it is a mixed bags in more modern times) so ultimately I don’t exactly agree with Agnaa as at some point, we really need to find something that should not cross the line further than it already has
From a VS debating perspective and tiering perspective, it is understandable.My point is not "SCP is exactly the same as Marvel and DC, and so if one gets deleted, the others should too!"
I was just giving an explanation for how SCP got high tiers.
Again, it's not about whether it should be allowed.From a VS debating perspective and tiering perspective, it is understandable.
But from a different perspective, the comparison will eventually run its course as the differences will have to come into what should been allowed into VSBW as I am well aware there has been discussions off and on site regarding such content such as this as it is a slippery slope (At least that is what I thinking).
Either way, I am more concerned about this as the SCP staff members are more than likely aware of this and has allowed for a long time (I think anyway) so to rope them in for what was caused indirectly by VBSW, intentionally or not, seems reasonable, but I not sure that will necessarily outright mitigate the problem as it is.
I think you misunderstood what I say. I not suggest that Marvel and DC get deleted off the site, I meant to refer to SCP as a whole as while it technically seems to have a approval process, that approval process isn’t necessarily the same as being approved by the writers and the company.Again, it's not about whether it should be allowed.
Bambu said "SCP gets these high tiers through contamination".
I said "No, it got those high tiers through a similar process to Marvel/DC".
Stop reading that as "If SCP gets deleted, Marvel/DC should get deleted too".
Whether SCP gets deleted due to that contamination or not would have absolutely zero bearing on whether Marvel/DC stay on the site.
I think we need to make a distinction here, i can't immediately ask Warner Bros or Marvel Disney to give me, a complete random guy with no credentials or friends in high places, a job to write for their comics. While i can indeed make a wikidot account and with enough effort and time eventually make my own SCP.
Again, it's not about whether it should be allowed.
Bambu said "SCP gets these high tiers through contamination".
I said "No, it got those high tiers through a similar process to Marvel/DC".
Stop reading that as "If SCP gets deleted, Marvel/DC should get deleted too".
Whether SCP gets deleted due to that contamination or not would have absolutely zero bearing on whether Marvel/DC stay on the site.
Ngl I wish I become staff one day (preferably fcoc)Hah. Another thread for the peasants of the land, who slave away on the Content Revision fields in the desperate hope of acknowledgement by their evaluating lords and ladies. How winsome. swirls Versus Battles Wiki brand wine glass with boundless outerversal layers of smug grins and 1-A pretentious aura hax
LolHah. Another thread for the peasants of the land, who slave away on the Content Revision fields in the desperate hope of acknowledgement by their evaluating lords and ladies. How winsome. swirls Versus Battles Wiki brand wine glass with boundless outerversal layers of smug grins and 1-A pretentious aura hax
(I'll be keeping an eye on this thread in case any novel, useful input on the thread comes up, since I think this is an important matter that warrants this kind of secondary thread for open input. I could have simply watched the thread without saying anything to do this, but this was more fun.)
No? If SCP gets deleted RPC goes with it and vice versa, they are the same thing in essence, the latter being created mostly out of spite.I just realized that if Scp gets deleted well only have... Rpc
Oh.No? If SCP gets deleted RPC goes with it and vice versa, they are the same thing in essence, the latter being created mostly out of spite.
As a member of the FC/OC community, we would like to humbly decline this offer. Since VSBW doesn't want it, maybe JBW would be interested instead. Sorry.Will they be moved to FCOC?
agreedI don't care about this thread right now but Idiosycraticlawyer's response to Bambu had to be one of the most childish and pretentious things I could imagine to be said here. Really not a good look for SCP supporters.
As someone who made a shitty low quality godmode profile on JBW once, I’d like to redirect SCP and its supporters to CSAP, who allow anyone to make pages about almost anythingI don't care about this thread right now but Idiosycraticlawyer's response to Bambu had to be one of the most childish and pretentious things I could imagine to be said here. Really not a good look for SCP supporters.
As a member of the FC/OC community, we would like to humbly decline this offer. Since VSBW doesn't want it, maybe JBW would be interested instead. Sorry.
It was an inappropriate comment, but he has apologised for it now. I would rather neither the main thread nor this one is used for open complaints about the matter.I don't care about this thread right now but Idiosycraticlawyer's response to Bambu had to be one of the most childish and pretentious things I could imagine to be said here. Really not a good look for SCP supporters.
It doesn't scale to Lotr or Harry PotterRegardless the conclusions of the thread, I think some profiles must be deleted. I mean, look at this profile scaling an SCP to Harry Potter and Lord of Rings characters
Yes, I was groggy when I typed that, and I could've expressed myself better.I don't care about this thread right now but Idiosycraticlawyer's response to Bambu had to be one of the most childish and pretentious things I could imagine to be said here. Really not a good look for SCP supporters.
It doesn't scale to Lotr or Harry Potter
It literally mentions it can kill the version of Gandalf from LoR (linking said profile) and Sherlock Homes from Sherlock.Varies (Its strength, powers, weapons, and abilities vary depending on the narrative it is placed in, allowing it to kill characters ranging from Sherlock Holmes to Gandalf)
Welp no matters what happens we lose in the end chat.Well we'll see what happens in the end.
Yes it is unbelievably stupid and blatant copyright theft, but from what i read it's ANY piece of fiction i.e just adpating to whatever piece of work in the Universe of SCP and that's just to feats in its Article. It doesn't literally mean the thing is Low 1-C because it killed Gandalf, that's not how things work for a majority of verses on this site with Crossovers, only some exceptions exist and this is not one of them.It literally mentions it can kill the version of Gandalf from LoR (linking said profile) and Sherlock Homes from Sherlock.
It should be irrefutably known now that SCP writers are, broadly speaking, aware of the wiki sufficiently to integrate its lingo into their own pages to achieve the effecs they want. Here, it is obvious their intended impressions are comedic or scornful: they achieve this by mentioning us directly. Other pages on the SCP wiki appear to be guilty of the same, but less explicitly, which we believe to be intentional to allow publication on our wiki (which further cements a competent awareness of VS Battles Wiki and its rulings on the subject).A less worrying case, but still worthy of mention following the above for its similar explicit mention of our lingo. It even goes so far as to cite the wiki pages it is satirizing, in particular our concept of "Tier 0" and our page on the Department of Unreality, which is the piece of Extended Canon this article is from. This, too, has well exceeded the necessary rating to be considered "canon" per our standards on that subject.