- 4,482
- 2,359
- Thread starter
- #241
Oh my ******* godExcept it's not? Except its .001 tons as the yield, not the gap away from 9-A? Except the fact that there are 5 calcs for rockets that are all .001 tons to support this being a consistent yield?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh my ******* godExcept it's not? Except its .001 tons as the yield, not the gap away from 9-A? Except the fact that there are 5 calcs for rockets that are all .001 tons to support this being a consistent yield?
100% agreedOk so based on what I know, the 9-A feats are Pyro's shed explosion, and MvM robots tanking the Sentry Buster. But there are also tons of 9-B feats like the explosion of pills and rockets.
Don't we have protocol for verses like this? If I remember correctly, IDW Transformers has tiers for both high end and low end feats because the verse is inconsistent with their scaling. Would it not be appropriate to do like, At least 9-B, at most 9-A?
I don't see why there can't be a compromise. We've been at a roundabout for days now spitting the same rhetoric and I've seen compelling arguments from both sides. There really isn't much to do here but compromise.
The 9-A feat is being recalced as there is a ton wrong with the math and it has already been agreed to be likely too vague to use regardlessOk so based on what I know, the 9-A feats are Pyro's shed explosion, and MvM robots tanking the Sentry Buster. But there are also tons of 9-B feats like the explosion of pills and rockets.
Don't we have protocol for verses like this? If I remember correctly, IDW Transformers has tiers for both high end and low end feats because the verse is inconsistent with their scaling. Would it not be appropriate to do like, At least 9-B, at most 9-A?
I don't see why there can't be a compromise. We've been at a roundabout for days now spitting the same rhetoric and I've seen compelling arguments from both sides. There really isn't much to do here but compromise.
Why do you kep bringing this up like its being usedThere is also the Scout feat where the net result (The entire explosion itself) is less than 0.001 tons away from being 9-A.
I can settle for an "at most 9-A" tier.
because it is. literally on the profile.Why do you kep bringing this up like its being used
I wouldnt thank me just yet, it came out to 8-C only further solidifying it as an outlierthanks for the recalc
ItEh you saved me the effort anyhow.
Even if we can't use it, it shows that the mercs can survive stuff above 9-B.
At this rate I'm just going to assume you are purposefully ignoring it.The scout feat's accepted value is .001 tons
Pyro's feat is the only 9-A feat you guys had yes
Which one?Demo's explosion from jungle inferno looks 9-A too, it should at the very least scale to him since he caused the explosion
This oneWhich one?
Do we know what caused the explosion?There is also the one inside of the building, but that may be hard to calc.
If you look closely pretty sure I could see a pill in there so probably a demoman.Do we know what caused the explosion?
Considering the crazy people with explosives and the lack of things that explode in that map otherwise, I'd bet it was either Soldier or Demo.Do we know what caused the explosion?
There were pills so probably thatDo we know what caused the explosion?
I can probably use SFM to helpI dont evn know how you would go about calcing that, for one theres no scale to measure its just a bunch of explosions right in the camera and for two it looks like multiple explosions going off not just one
This would in fact be an extreme case. Pyro tanking an 8-C explosion produced by a warehouse of explosives that consistently oneshot the mercs in every other scenario is an outlier in every senseOutlier is for extreme cases. Not 9-B, possibly 9-A due to demos pill to 8-C
That consistently one shot the mercs? We don't know what kinda explosions those were, TFC mercs are weaker than TF2 mercsThis would in fact be an extreme case. Pyro tanking an 8-C explosion produced by a warehouse of explosives that consistently oneshot the mercs in every other scenario is an outlier in every sense
Cool? That dosn't change the fact I'm nowhere near trusting that calc of yours given you're clearly opposed to this to the extent that you ignore an admin-approved calc that people have told you about several timesCool? That doesnt change the fact that tanking an 8-C feat with no damage is an outlier for a cast of characters that are consistntly hurt, maimed, and killed by 9-B weaponry
Says the guy ignoring five admin approved 9-B calcs and declarations from admins that 9-A isnt viable?Cool? That dosn't change the fact I'm nowhere near trusting that calc of yours given you're clearly opposed to this to the extent that you ignore an admin-approved calc that people have told you about several times
Other admins have said it is viable so....Says the guy ignoring five admin approved 9-B calcs and declarations from admins that 9-A isnt viable?
erm, both Mr. Bambu and DMUA both said on the current Meet the Medic explosion that the current one isn't necessarily more accurate than the previous one.Says the guy ignoring five admin approved 9-B calcs and declarations from admins that 9-A isnt viable?
There isnt more than one, there is a single 9-A feat that was recalced to 8-C, the rest is literally just upscaling from mid level 9-B attacks that kill themAt this moment I'm leaning towards Sir_Ovens's proposal, and basically to the cast becoming stronger than just 9-B.
There's feats some of which were calced and accepted, the fact that characters are hurted by 9-B attacks doesn't necessarily making 9-A feats an outlier, at least because there's more than one.
And also I'm just interested how it would end.