Farfetchedx
He/Him- 233
- 334
I was just saying that IF it was squared like some people have said to try to lowball Saitama. It would actually make them uni insteadSo then what is your point?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was just saying that IF it was squared like some people have said to try to lowball Saitama. It would actually make them uni insteadSo then what is your point?
I know.I not saying the Serious Punch² was actually squared
It'd be inconsistent because Saitama in context went all out against Garou. There was no holding back. If it is confirmed that SP² is literal, then there's no way Saitama or Garou will just scale to it normally. It wouldn't make any sense for them to scale to the squared power of their punches because it is obvious they can't normally output that much power if they are alone. Garou's durability later being damaged by Saitama will be just an inconsistency in that case.but if it was, I don't see why it would be inconsistent. Saitama's durability scales above his ap and we don't even know if Saitama used all of his force in that punch.
This is not true because we know Saitama did use his full power against Garou.So if Saitama didn't use his full power and casually has higher durability than AP then I could see them tanking it
The thing is with this is that when Saitama landed on Jupiter, he said he can let loose at full power implying he wasn't going full power before. So idkI know.
It'd be inconsistent because Saitama in context went all out against Garou. There was no holding back. If it is confirmed that SP² is literal, then there's no way Saitama or Garou will just scale to it normally. It wouldn't make any sense for them to scale to the squared power of their punches because it is obvious they can't normally output that much power if they are alone. Garou's durability later being damaged by Saitama will be just an inconsistency in that case.
This is not true because we know Saitama did use his full power against Garou.
Even if you don't think the Serious Punch on earth was his full power, Saitama later admitting Garou could withstand his full power on Jupiter at least implies he was using like 80% of his full power or so. Otherwise, the statement of him stating Garou can withstand his full power despite him only using a Serious Punch that's exponentially weaker than his actual full power doesn't make any sense.The thing is with this is that when Saitama landed on Jupiter, he said he can let loose at full power implying he wasn't going full power before. So idk
You're just repeating "it will make no sense", "it is inconsistent" with nothing to back it up tbf.It'd be inconsistent because Saitama in context went all out against Garou. There was no holding back. If it is confirmed that SP² is literal, then there's no way Saitama or Garou will just scale to it normally. It wouldn't make any sense for them to scale to the squared power of their punches because it is obvious they can't normally output that much power if they are alone. Garou's durability later being damaged by Saitama will be just an inconsistency in that case.
Because it just... doesn't make sense? You can't have it both ways. If it's squared, then nobody scales. Garou's durability being later damaged by Saitama's punches means them "tanking" the squared power of their punches is just inconsistent. Or we have to assume their durability was somehow squared at that exact moment too. One thing for sure is their AP doesn't scale to it because it ignores the notion that the punch was squared.You're just repeating "it will make no sense", "it is inconsistent" with nothing to back it up tbf.
Not saying it really is 3-A, but that's not even a argument. Stonewalls exist in fiction, and Saitama grew stronger before damaging Garou, so I can't see the supposed "inconsistency"
Saitama used his full power against Garou, just not at that point of the fight. In Jupiter, Saitama was speedblitzing Garou with ease, despite Garou copied his Serious Punch seconds ago. If Saitama was indeed using his full power before that, then Garou wouldn't have been stomped so hard.Saitama was not using his full power? The context was him going all out against Garou. I don't know why people keep assuming he didn't use his full power.
Cool, how does that contradict Saitama reaching the level of his serious punch squared? Saitama was, in fact, damaging Garou, who supported the energy of the SSSP^2, so he scales, end of the debate.And growing massively stronger =/= reaching the squared level in an instant. Garou saying "If this keeps up, he will eventually one-shot me" means Saitama couldn't one-shot Garou instantly despite using full power.
It is not? We see Garou withstanding SSSP^2, we see Saitama damaging Garou. Conclusion? Saitama scales to the full value of SSSP^2, regardless it is treated as squared the original value or not. You keep saying it is inconsistent, but show no actual reasoning of whyIt's only later he powered up enough that he was finally able to treat Garou as a joke. Your argument of Saitama damaging Garou because he can reach the squared punch level in an instant after landing on Jupiter is unfounded.
they where literraly on the center of the energy burst of the SP squared,they scale,why they will not do it if they where in the CENTER.aitama's normal AP can't scale to SP^2 if it's squared lol. I don't know why is it hard to understand. But let's agree to disagree.
I'd say it's an inconsistency. Because scaling both Saitama and Garou to SP^2 while assuming the name of the attack is literal means... you are actually thinking it isn't squared?they where literraly on the center of the energy burst of the SP squared,they scale,why they will not do it if they where in the CENTER.
unless you want to tell me that aparently it does not make sense because i don't know.
and boruto was like 8 years,and it is still nothing except more than boredomIt's crazy that Garou Vs. Saitama was already 8 years ago.
that sounds contradictory,i don't see how this works,if the attack is squared to the power,then both will still scale based on their durability anywayI'd say it's an inconsistency. Because scaling both Saitama and Garou to SP^2 while assuming the name of the attack is literal means... you are actually thinking it isn't squared?
Massive Alexander W.and boruto was like 8 years,and it is still nothing except more than boredom
10 pagesSo how much shorter is this next chapter going to be
don't tell me,i was thereVersus (one's other series) is goimg quite hard rn
dieVersus is weak the gods of the verse aliens just punched a guy through some walls and the MC is pretty much fodder
Instant death aura goes brrrVersus is weak the gods of the verse aliens just punched a guy through some walls and the MC is pretty much fodder
Coom if you were good maybe Santa will bring tatsumaki a good speed feat this year
Tatsumaki joins Empty Void battle and got FTL casually.Coom if you were good maybe Santa will bring tatsumaki a good speed feat this year