- 18,393
- 14,323
Introduction
Thanks to @Deagonx, I realized that I forgot to include an important rule in the discussion rules page regarding staff discussions.
While the existing rules are acceptable, I would like to propose an additional rule that aims to prevent any misunderstandings within the community, particularly among the staff members.
Each staff member's input will be valued and given appropriate weight, depending on the subject matter of the discussion thread. For instance, if a staff thread pertains to calculations, the staff member specialized in calculations will have more influence compared to a thread moderator, as their expertise lies in that specific area. If the staff thread is solely for content revision, exceptions can be considered, as the only distinction between the two threads is the presence of strict moderation. In such cases, the rules applicable to the content revision guidelines will be followed for that thread.
Draft
If you have any additional suggestions or if you identify any flaws in the draft, it can still be modified or altered accordingly.
For visitors
- Regular members may not comment on staff discussion threads marked as “Restricted solely for staff members” under any circumstances, as such discussions cover sensitive wiki policy issues and other similar crucial matters that require great caution.
Restricted solely for staff members;
Ideally, input from staff members across various fields is preferred;
Last edited:
