- 18,393
- 14,323
- Thread starter
- #81
Well, with this wording, anything that requires a canonical/verse evidence is not official policy revision. For example, the DC/Marvel ruling (the thread you were using to veto) is an official policy revision, since it does not require any canonical/verse evidence.1) Okay, but it is hard to understand the intentions of the way you worded your sentences.
Rather, it simply a specific restriction on how much a character has to appear before they can be indexed. This applies to no other verses, and is based on concerns of quality for the wiki as a whole, rather than evidence from the series itself.
Agnaa explained it here.
The bolded part won't obviously be included.2) Yes, but without the bolded text, and written as: "Official policy revisions encompass..."
We can replace “encompass” with “are”. Is it fine? "Official policy revisions are ....etc"
Last edited: