- 11,658
- 16,042
My thoughts are exactly the same as Planck's.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is needed in this case, for the reasons I just outlined (i.e. The avoidance of damage is given by the intangibility, so if you bypass the intangibility, you bypass this avoidance). You haven't given any rebuttal whatsoever beyond "That's not how it works," when it is, in fact, how it works by basic logic.No, that's not how NPI works, it's literally being able to interact with the being in question as if they're a physical object to interact with. Actually harming them isn't remotely needed, and Soma's still in the other dimension while being grabbed in the current dimension so he's still being interacted with.
Bolded part is exactly what's being contested here, so repeating it does absolutely nothing. You haven't proved that normal causality (What I've been referring to all along, by the way, as you can see by me using "regular causality" and the like in previous posts of mine, so the last bit about Type 5 Acausality just shows you're missing the point) is at all restricted to the human world, which is, again, what you have to prove here. "Outside human law" = "Outside regular causality" is only a sound argument if regular causality is solely human law to begin with, which is something to be positively proven and not simply assumed. it's like how you wouldn't assume that the Abyss is also outside of the laws of logic just because those apply to the human world. Same deal goes here.It being exclusively to the human world isn't my main argument, it's that creatures of chaos are outside of whatever cause and effect rules apply in the human world and function on different rules, ergo different sets of cause and effect. The Acausality page itself even makes this clear
It's functioning on different systems than the regular world, being outside the laws of the normal world means you're not bound by their systems and you'd operate completely different than normal. If I was arguing that Causality was exclusively to the human world only and they're above all of cause and effect then I would've pushed for type 5 Acausality a long time ago with that kind of logic.
What do you mean by "scripted" tho? Its not a cutscene, its not something inevitable to happen. She is coded to grab you and peform X animation once she hit the hitbox, and thats it. That's no different from trying to use animations of Dracula dying from a fall or Alucard dying to some random spikes to downgrade the verse, since its technically "scripted" and are animations.That doesn't debunk the fact she still grabs you, like what part of that is game mechanics and not just something scripted to happen? Game mechanics is being able to die to normal weak enemies that are canonically weaker to you, not an in game scripted thing that's designed to happen.
Its really just a flowery language to make immortality sound coolerC1: Precisely. That is what makes death so sinister: The abyss of time that brings to fruition even the most far-fetched of schemes. Do you know what is the biggest hindrance to humans when attempting to accomplish something?
C2: ...Is it that their lifesspans are limited? And individual's time is too short to accomplish a huge feat.
C1: You are correct. That limitation cannot be covercome. And the greater the feat, the truer this fact. But Death, like Dracula, is a dweller of the darkness where the laws of the human world do not apply. His time is eternal, for all itents and purposes. There is no mistaking that he has meticulously prepared for this moment a long while now
Why would that change anything? Soma's actual body is phased into the mirror dimension, while the appearance of him in the castle is just an image. If the Succubus manages to physically grab him, she interacts with his body, and not with the image. Therefore, since she is interacting with his body, she should be able to harm him just fine.Can you stop ignoring the points I’m bringing up where Soma is still in the mirror dimension to begin with while the Succubus is in the normal dimension of the castle? This isn’t elemental or phasing intangibility where their body is still technically there, this is literally going to another dimension and his spot in the castle dimension is what’s being interacted with.
"Regular causality applies to the human world" is not the same proposition as "Regular causality is solely human law." I affirmed the former and not the latter. Saying they're the same is like saying "Dimensionality applies to the human world, therefore it's human law, and anything outside human law is outside dimensionality." You could, as said, apply that to a number of things which I'm sure you're not really willing to push for (Even if they involve the exact same logic and therefore are just as valid as what you're saying right now)You literally admitted that causality is a part of human law, so why would a being that doesn’t operate under human laws would follow their cause and effect when scientific laws in general are always about Cause and effect in the first place? Plus again none of that was ever mentioned as a requirement for type 4 when stuff like existing outside of time conceptually or predating time would qualify for these kinds of Acausality when Causality isn’t needed to be spelled out. So either you’re bringing up some standard that wasn’t remotely accepted on the site or there would need to be some evaluation on Acausality type 4 as a whole.
They really aren’t that different in this context. Cause and effect are just “things happen as a result of things”, it doesn’t have to be limited by three dimensions or four dimensions. This is applying powerscaling logic to a situation devoid of it (and to an extremely vague statement anyway)Causality and dimensionality aren't the same thing so Idk why you're making that apples and oranges comparison here when one's a higher plane of existence jump and the other is just a being that doesn't operate under the same rules as more conventional forms of life
I think the point is why is one of these laws specifically causality? Especially when the statement is talking about immortality.@Robo432343 it literally has laws in plural, meaning more than one and Alucard knows more about creatures of chaos than anyone given he’s one himself and has been around since the beginning, unless you wanna say Alucard is wrong for some reason, there’s nothing to suggest that this is limited to specific laws.
I'm not sure if there is any other any that performs a grabOn Grabbing
- Is the animation any different than the ordinary grab animation, excepting any minor things like the target still having the same visual representation of being in the mirror?
- Are there any grabs that operate on the target differently, or do all work the same (entering an animation, but not dealing any damage)?