- 742
- 86
- Thread starter
- #41
You're saying time travel dosen't make the statement invalid? But those are both literally your arguments for being invalid as you said it was "hyperbole and flowery langauge" for time travel. And as Tony pointed out being of a higher plane beyond ect ect is also a valid way to prove higher dimensionality.Come on it doesn't make the stament invalid, you just posted a statement saying it "transcends" a past, present, future, something existing outside of space-time can do that in fiction and there is pretty common. Being above doesn't mean infinitely above and that is what is required to be Low 1C, The only proof I am seeing right here is a single, random quote from Stephen that isn't supported by anything. Low 1C is a complete different level of infinity that would inflate the entire verse. A single quote related to a context of time travelling isn't nearly enought to make a Low 2C construct like the Expanse a higher level of infinity, there are no quotes of it being a higher dimensional or a higher level of infinity at all and it was never portrayed as such to my knowledge.