Servant of the Flame vs Servant of the Void (Herah vs Vel'Koz) Battle for 4th Strongest Low 7-C

[WeeklyBattles]

No th problem is youre treating Void energy as not Void energy. The stuff in those blogs was not done by any voidborn, it was done solely by the influence of void enrgy

You kinda wasted your time typing out that whol argument as its based on a single faulty assumption

 

[Duedate8898]

Okay, I see I'm not going to get through to you. So I'm going to just stop trying to convince you to back of your claim with anything. Instead, since it seems everyone here but you agrees that Herah should be able to take it, I shall refer back to the thread that started this all to either get some more votes or just have this accepted already.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

I mean thatis factually incorrect, she does not take it, its not really an opinion at this point and i will immediately have this thread removed if it gets FRA trained into an incorrect outcome

 

[Duedate8898]

Go ahead, the thread itself is just here to know the argument has been made. And since it's been linked mutliple times I'm sure for those that it matters to it's proved its point. And if no one else agrees with you, I would care to think that means that your argument isn't being believed in.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

No its mor akin to you being willfully ignorant of how Vel's powers work and continuing to claim that youre right even when proven otherwise

 

[Duedate8898]

Whatever you say Weekly.

 

[XDragnoir]

I mean thatis factually incorrect, she does not take it, its not really an opinion at this point and i will immediately have this thread removed if it gets FRA trained into an incorrect outcome

This thread is closer to a stomp than to something that will be added, it is either 6D EE GG or H1A LOLNOPE.

Yes, i read when you said Jeff resists H1A EE, Due.

 

[Ricsi-viragosi]

I really adore how Vel'koz's ability section specifies that it's only his attacks that have these effects, so you can't even claim that it isn't specified on there.
As wonderful as it'll be once all those claims are accepted, for now they contradict the profile, so too bad.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

I really adore how Vel'koz's ability section specifies that it's only his attacks that have these effects, so you can't even claim that it isn't specified on there.
As wonderful as it'll be once all those claims are accepted, for now they contradict the profile, so too bad.

...Yes, his attacks are what have this effect, that is what i have been arguing. Duedate and XDragnoir have been arguing that they dont have the effects at all

Not really sure what the point of making this comment was lol, the way youre wording it seems to try to disagree with me but you agreed with me at the same time

 

[Ricsi-viragosi]

The fact that it isn't passive at all. Which, while you might have taken back, you certainly argued before.

The abilities are specifically listed under attacks, which means they aren't something that work outside of attacks. Claiming otherwise goes against the profile.

It also lacks specifications for 6D,which too would need to go on there.


Like I told you last time (a year ago, more or less? A proper year I mean), unless things are accepted in a crt don't bring them up.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

The energy attacks Vel uses have the passive effects listed in his profile as stated in his powers and abilities section

Like I told you last time (a year ago, more or less? A proper year I mean), unless things are accepted in a crt don't bring them up.

Man i wish everyone was held to this standard

 

[Blackcurrant91]

Why are we even talking about 6-D shit when it hasn't been accepted?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Why are we even talking about 6-D shit when it hasn't been accepted?

I could say the same thing about why we're talking about Jeffery having High 1-A resistances that havent been accepted

 

[Ricsi-viragosi]

That is not what passive means. You'd at most define them as side-effects, or simply effects, of an attack. He still needs to perform them, which is not passive.

And really? Again? For the fiftieth time, others being wrong doesn't justify you. You promised it'll be added long, long ago, and it was not. Stop bringing it up until you can get it through.

 

[Blackcurrant91]

Lol what? all the High 1-A shit was already accepted for Deluge of the Abyss...

 

[Ricsi-viragosi]

I could say the same thing about why we're talking about Jeffery having High 1-A resistances that havent been accepted

The profile links to resisting the abilities of a High 1-A as justification...

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Lol what? all the High 1-A shit was already accepted for Deluge of the Abyss...

Not according to Duedate, who just a while ago said and i quote

"Just like you're using non-accepted things, I shall as well.
Which is that Herah's EE is also High 1-A, I just haven't made the thread for it yet to be accepted."

 

[Blackcurrant91]

Dude he's talking about her EE not her resistances...

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Dude he's talking about her EE not her resistances...

No he is talking about her resistances as he said that in response to Jeffery not being able to resist 6-D EE

 

[WeeklyBattles]

That is not what passive means. You'd at most define them as side-effects, or simply effects, of an attack. He still needs to perform them, which is not passive.

And really? Again? For the fiftieth time, others being wrong doesn't justify you. You promised it'll be added long, long ago, and it was not. Stop bringing it up until you can get it through.

That is what passive means yes, the energy he uses in his attacks passively has all of those effects and he gives off said energy by existing

Yes, again, and every time after. Perhaps start doing something about everyone else and stop singling me out

 

[Blackcurrant91]

This whole thread is so ******* petty.

A. You can't use shit not accepted in a CRT

B. It's such a shitty argument to say 'everyone else does so why can't I'

6-D shit is not something that can be used in this thread and I dont want to see it brought up again till it's accepted. Like your argument is becoming incredibly childish.

 

[Ricsi-viragosi]

Weekly, stop.

Passive, as used in vsbattles, is an ability that is always active and requires no action from the character to take effect. Passive soul destruction means anything near the character will have their souls destroyed, not that anything punched by the character will have it destroyed.

And drop the "stop singling me out!". I swear every single time an argument comes up this comes out. No. I am not singling you out. I contributed in downgrading Bill Cipher again, I am making a downgrade for Saint Seiya and preparing myself for a debate with Matt, and so on.

 

[Planck69]

Dear God, Weekly, stop this habit of yours. If the profile ain't specifying 6-D then don't use it.

 

[Zaratthustra]

Weekly your arguments is more or less this "A knife has passive cutting effect because it's sharp" or "Punches have passive kinetic energy", "Eyes have passive vision" etc. Your arguments every time it comes to LoL are more or less baseless. Everytime it goes in a circle when the "void" comes into play in a debate regarding LoL and everytime it's from you. Sincerely, I think either LoL Voidlings and those that use Void Energy to be banned from matches till the problem is resolved or you yourself be banned from debating in matches with those characters. I just don't see any other path because it goes in a circle even a year after the last thread on Void. Each time a match the same arguments appear ...nothing changes.

I will ask for this to be closed and a ban on the void characters to be put.

 

[Blackcurrant91]

I heavily agree with Zarat

 

[Ricsi-viragosi]

I don't particularly care. For this thread though, assuming that "not-on-profile" is to be ignored, how does the fight go?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

I don't particularly care. For this thread though, assuming that "not-on-profile" is to be ignored, how does the fight go?

Herah stomps

 

[Ricsi-viragosi]

Wonderful, there you have the match.