- 6,135
- 4,213
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stufffs
Like I said address the OPThis thread is about you guys bring up where SS and WotL was referred to as dimension when used
Thanks for the amazing advice, I did, now stop the derailment pleaseLike I said address the OP
Nope but well that's okay tooThanks for the amazing advice, I did,
Did you just concede to Garganta overlapping all the other dimensions? Everyone has been telling you that Garganta is outer space to the dimensions as if they were planets.Here's the proof that you don't actually open a portal to another dimension. You can just rip open the dimensional walls and there it is, the garganta. Like, this is the most blatant proof that Garganta dimension overlaps with Earth. You don't need anything else.
You didn't read the thread properly or probably misunderstood something yet again. Garganta is not outer space. It is a dimension that overlaps with Earth, SS and HM and fills the dimensional gaps between them. That post was the proof of Garganta being accessed by ripping apart dimensional walls, in response to Gilver's assumption that people only open portals to something that exists far beyond the universe.Did you just concede to Garganta overlapping all the other dimensions? Everyone has been telling you that Garganta is outer space to the dimensions as if they were planets.
Which means you dropped your original argument about Garganta. You also debunked your own argument about the effects on the universe since I uno reverse that argument with planets and you debunked it. There was also one more argument from your OP that you debunked. I can’t go through the whole thread now but you can at least update your arguments with the ones that remain.You didn't read the thread properly or probably misunderstood something yet again. Garganta is not outer space. It is a dimension that overlaps with Earth, SS and HM and fills the dimensional gaps between them. That post was the proof of Garganta being accessed by ripping apart dimensional walls, in response to Gilver's assumption that people only open portals to something that exists far beyond the universe.
@KingJod23; those are sketches from volume extras. They don't mean anything and are symbolic at best.
Nice strawhat. Not remembering something that happened in the first page has nothing to do with the current argument.You admit that you haven't gone through the thread. It's clear you are not keeping track. If you can't do that, then you shouldn't comment. My argument hasn't changed one bit. The thread itself has little to do with Garganta.
Every single sketch adds info to canon. Find me a sketch that doesn’t.@AppleLord; isn't that the Association Fallacy? A sketch depicting something that happened in canon doesn't mean all other sketches also literally depict something happening in canon.
Bro, YOU need to prove that every single sketch is canon.Every single sketch adds info to canon. Find me a sketch that doesn’t.
nice reverse burden of proofEvery single sketch adds info to canon. Find me a sketch that doesn’t.
That is not how it works.Bro, YOU need to prove that every single sketch is canon.
Chapter 259.Every single sketch adds info to canon. Find me a sketch that doesn’t.
You want me to proof a negative?nice reverse burden of proof
That's... Literally how it works. You make a claim, you prove it.That is not how it works.
Read Chapter 88.5. Those events are canon.Chapter 259.
The author created it. You need to prove that something he made isn’t canon. If it doesn’t fit the timeline.That's... Literally how it works. You make a claim, you prove it.
Burden of proof is on you actuallyEvery single sketch adds info to canon. Find me a sketch that doesn’t.
1. You were on the positive, not the negative, furthermore you were the one that made the claim.You want me to proof a negative?
How do I prove Kubo draw it? You want me to send him a message?1. You were on the positive, not the negative, furthermore you were the one that made the claim.
2. It is possible to prove a negative
3. It's common sense if you make a claim, you prove it, otherwise we can just dismiss the claim via hitchen's razor.
thought it was filler. welp i was wrong.Debunked again.
Chapter 88.5 volume 10.
Until the anime comes out and the sketches are added into the anime. It would take a few years since that happens at the end of the manga. Whatever happens in this thread here doesn’t matter. Even if a new rule is made the anime counts as new source specially when Kubo himself said to be doing the sketches of every anime episode in his Klub Kubo Q&A.So the "planet analogy" thing is still the best and only rebuttal against the OP?
Can you do this^ with your other, i.e. your main claim? Because that is how you prove itDebunked again.
Chapter 88.5 volume 10.
I don't think that would work. You'd ideally need the sketches to be referred to in the mangaUntil the anime comes out and the sketches are added into the anime.
For every sketch? That would take time. I don’t an available PC anymore so double the time. I could but it will take time.Can you do this^ with your other, i.e. your main claim? Because that is how you prove it
Using Occam Razor it takes a lot more assumptions to support your theory and what you have wrote in the OP. That’s the reason many people disagree with your post.The sketch argument is so bad that I am disappointed people are using it when there's nothing left. I can easily get into it but I don't want to waste my energy. Anybody can just go read the manga from chapter 675 through 684. The last page of each chapter symbolizes how Yhwach can rewrite a future, then there are several possibilities, that drop down on a balance scale, it breaks, and all those possibilities come together to form the word "despair". Because Ichigo was completely broken by that time and Yhwach had revealed that no matter what Ichigo does, no matter how many possibilities, Yhwach can rewrite them all.
I mean, come on. At least use some valid argument. ...............
No need. Kubo drawn them in the manga and he is drawing the episodes sketches in the anime too. There is a possibility the anime will be different and true to Kubo’s original idea since he was rushed to end the manga because of his illness and already said he was drawing new characters for the anime.I don't think that would work. You'd ideally need the sketches to be referred to in the manga
Just the one you want to use as evidence would be enoughFor every sketch?
Well, we seem to have enough staff approval to apply this now.So… is there anything else to say or are we gonna go another 3 pages repeating the same thing over and over….?
Those staff don't even debate thoWell, we seem to have enough staff approval to apply this now.
Not everyone on the thread is required to participate in the debate itself.Those staff don't even debate tho