- 665
- 53
The Hateful Star has been rewritten.
I'm not sure of if it affects its ratings because I haven't read it
I'm not sure of if it affects its ratings because I haven't read it
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
SCP Discussion Thread 6
- Thread starter Agnaa
- Start date
- Status
- 10,393
- 3,344
RPC is like, bootleg SCP, it's kinda sad.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Nowhere near that. Two or three mods were demoted and only a handful users were blocked at best.
- 10,393
- 3,344
I assume you're responding to Ovens?
- 328
- 12
And thats means
- 15,867
- 8,968
But there were more vocal users whom stated that they were leaving because of the logo change. Feels a little petty, but people will be people. I just feel like making an entire site that is basically the SCP Wiki without the mods is a taking it a little too far.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Though, the guy who wrote SCP-1548 has deleted it and a new one has replaced it, so it's been retconned out of existence.
- 665
- 53
I think he also wrote 2722
- 15,332
- 7,559
He did. It's been deleted.
- 328
- 12
So i think we should remove SCP 1548 profile
- 328
- 12
No i dont think
- 665
- 53
Not really, we have to change the Stats accordingly to the new SCP
- 15,332
- 7,559
If that's our intended course of action, we should also remove 2722. It no longer exists.
- 61,134
- 14,617
Goddam people need to chill
Also i dont think they need to be deleted especially considering tales and logs using those two still exist, pronmbably just have them treated as retconned stuff
Also i dont think they need to be deleted especially considering tales and logs using those two still exist, pronmbably just have them treated as retconned stuff
- 15,332
- 7,559
To be fair, Kaktus is a huge ******* asshole and told LGBT people to **** off if they disliked the change.
- 665
- 53
I mean, Kaktus apologized for that and removed himself of his admin in the SCP Reddit
Also, it seems that SCP-1548 is now in the RCP as RCP-548
Also, it seems that SCP-1548 is now in the RCP as RCP-548
- 15,332
- 7,559
The author of 1548 and 2722 has deleted all of his logs and tales concerning his SCPs, so no, there is no canonical material left involving either of these.
And the SCP log where 2722 fights 682 is going to be forcibly removed either way due to the fact the rewritten 2722 will be something else.
And the SCP log where 2722 fights 682 is going to be forcibly removed either way due to the fact the rewritten 2722 will be something else.
- 61,134
- 14,617
http://www.scp-wiki.net/search:site/a/p/q/1548
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/search:site/a/p/q/2722
There are still a lot of pages with both 1548 and 2722
Worst case scenario we treat them as decomissioned SCPs
There's no reason to remove them
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/search:site/a/p/q/2722
There are still a lot of pages with both 1548 and 2722
Worst case scenario we treat them as decomissioned SCPs
There's no reason to remove them
- 15,332
- 7,559
Except they have been removed by their own authors, we can't scale from something that no longer exists and has been retconned into another franchise.
- 61,134
- 14,617
It does exist though, both 2722 and 1548 exist in tales and logs
- 15,332
- 7,559
Which can't be considered since their source material doesn't exist and is null and void by default due to the author retconning it.
Also, decomissioning SCPs is now a banned practice.
Also, decomissioning SCPs is now a banned practice.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Also, since SCP-2722's log has been deleted, it can't receive scaling from it either way.
- 328
- 12
The new Scp 1548 seems way ol than the orginal Scp 1548
- 61,134
- 14,617
@Kep then scale it from the 2722 and the 1548 from the tales that still exist in tales, both have feats on the level of the original SCPs
- 15,332
- 7,559
How are you going to write a summary for a SCP which has zero backstory now, and is only namedropped on other tales?
"SCP-2722 is something unknown that has been namedroped on SCP-2301's log?"
"SCP-2722 is something unknown that has been namedroped on SCP-2301's log?"
- 61,134
- 14,617
http://www.scp-wiki.net/stealingsolidarityhub
This alone has enough info for the Solidarity to justify it keeping its page
At worst just rename the page "The Solidarity" since it wont be 2722 anymore
This alone has enough info for the Solidarity to justify it keeping its page
At worst just rename the page "The Solidarity" since it wont be 2722 anymore
- 15,332
- 7,559
Are there any feats there even approaching the original ratings?
- 328
- 12
Can we have AN RPC AUTHIRY PAGE PLEASE!?
- 328
- 12
Also can we have a profile for the Scp 1548? Because Ill will be pretty pissed iff if we dont . I mean come on we a profie fir a bizza box and not a magical sikar system
- 328
- 12
Soo Lets assume we found an a scp ghe slowly devours reality and in in fact a part of a god
- 328
- 12
Thats wha i was talking about http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-2742
- 328
- 12
Go chek it please and tell me if we can have a profile for it
- 328
- 12
And this one please http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-2442
- 10,393
- 3,344
Stop posting so much in succession.
- 328
- 12
Sorry I wasnt aware of thatThe Everlasting said:
- 15,636
- 5,391
We should delete the page.
Being removed from the site entirely isn't decommissioning. Decomissioning is where an SCP is "so bad", that some resident a-holes write an entire story about blowing it up.
Deletion is practically retconning unless a -ARC is created, which it won't in the case of author removal.
682 can't scale off of "Solidarity", aseven in extended canon it's referred to as 2722, which will be retconned into a different SCP. You'd be lucky to get Solidarity as a page, considering those tales are likely to be removed in response to this sitiation.
I personally say it's safer to just drop the page; we don't have the SCP file anymore and can't use anything to go off of it but that one series of tales, and I don't even know if those five enough info on it. Even the tales refer to it by its SCP number, which is just blatantly incorrect now.
(EDIT): And this is one of the issues I was talking about, before.
Being removed from the site entirely isn't decommissioning. Decomissioning is where an SCP is "so bad", that some resident a-holes write an entire story about blowing it up.
Deletion is practically retconning unless a -ARC is created, which it won't in the case of author removal.
682 can't scale off of "Solidarity", aseven in extended canon it's referred to as 2722, which will be retconned into a different SCP. You'd be lucky to get Solidarity as a page, considering those tales are likely to be removed in response to this sitiation.
I personally say it's safer to just drop the page; we don't have the SCP file anymore and can't use anything to go off of it but that one series of tales, and I don't even know if those five enough info on it. Even the tales refer to it by its SCP number, which is just blatantly incorrect now.
(EDIT): And this is one of the issues I was talking about, before.
- Status
Similar threads
