You have no god damn idea how much I would love to but we both know it ain’t gonna happen
They dont though? Force is not an automatic disqualifier when the lasers in question have every property of lightspeed
Then quit bullying a smaller verse that has more justification for lightspeed than it smh
I think you're confusing my point here. Force itself is an anti-showing, but showing a dozen instances of the beams having force doesn't mean you have a dozen anti-feats. It's means you have proven that one aspect of the lasers not being realistic is consistent in that franchise, which counts as a singular counterpoint.
I bring up Ruby’s molecular description by Penny not because that proves Ruby moves at lightspeed, but because it shows that scientists and knowledgeable people in the RWBYverse how a in-depth knowledge of how molecules work. Thus, their science is comparable to ours and thus, they know how fast a laser would be.
If at least three of them must be fufilled, why does Naruto get away with just having one LS statement in a guidebook?
None of that is relevant. You do not need to prove this, this is just a baseline assumption we should always believe. Edit: In a Sci-Fi world such as RWBY I mean.
But it is an anti feat. So the Particle Cannon? Debunked as light speed, produces force AND lacks any other qualities of light speed. It must meet wiki standards, name alone doesn’t cut it, you know this. It could be called the “lightspeed mega death cannon that definitely moves at light speed tm” and it would still need wiki standards to be accepted.
I know, but in conjunction with other points, the only possible true laser technology being used is Penny’s, as it shows more than one property of light. The others do not, on top of having force. So an aspect of them is unrealistic, on top of a lack of feats beyond naming conventions.
vsbattles.fandom.com
Its not magic ice, its a flat sheet of natural ice.
Hard Light Dust alone proves this given that it is natural light in its raw state, but the fact that Atlas' scientists describe the Spider Droid's laser as a particle cannon would be proof as well.
Yes, Hard Light Dust, which is natural light. Also the particle cannon laser of the Spider Droid. Both of which were stated as such by the most intelligent scientists in the world who developed both light dust-based lasers and the spider droid's particle cannon.
Not sure how its unrelated when its a blatant demonstration of hard light dust projecting natural light in its raw form, same with the cameras of scrolls and the holograms used by Atlas. Its blatant proof that hard light dust in its raw form is natural light, and thus the lasers that project hard light dust are in fact projecting natural light. Saying that its unrelated is just outright false.
Boyo, the check four out of the five criteria and the scans that prove they do have been posted multiple times
Boyo, all of the lasers in the verse have the same properties as Penny's, what are you even talking about
Particle cannons are lightspeed by definition, there was literally an entire CRT about this a few months back
Use light dust as a source and thus project natural light
Thats nice Glass, read the actual thread, Rusty is wrong, the lasers fit every single criteria to be lightspeed
Light speed statements.
While I don't like bringing up other verses in a CRT. Actual statements of something moving at lightspeed is WAY more acceptable than something being called a laser by a scientist. Since Sci-Fi lasers in fiction don't automatically equal lasers, are else are lightspeed rules wouldn't make any sense.
From what I've seeing it doesn't.
Boyo ive posted the statements o lightspeed in RWBY and you ignored it
Cool? We havent been arguing that her lasers run on hard light dust, just that theyre mechanical lasers, which would still qualify for lightspeed, and that theyre referred to as the same kinds of lasers as particle cannons and lasers thart project raw natural light
Already have, several times. Penny's lasers being the same as natural light lasers and particle cannons is more than enough given her beams have every other property of lightspeed
I was literally lied to about the hard light dust, idk why that is ever being brought up again
Yeah? That’s what I said lol?
RWBY has lightspeed statements that have been posted in this thread smh
I was agreeing with you. I know that's what you said, I don't understand this response though. However let's not derail this thread.
If true that’d just end the discussion. Can you cite the explicit SoL statement(s)?
In your most recent response to Rusty, when he pointed out how the qualifying criteria for lasers to be light speed is if they’re explicitly said to be light speed and you pointed out “hard-light based lasers”
Yes, the lasers from the Atlas turrets and gunships, not Penny's lasers
Bro, prove THOSE lasers are lightspeed OR made from hard light dust. I’m begging bro
Because of the wikis strict as hell rules on fictional lasers, IT NEEDS TO BE SAID ITS SOL or else it's not a laser apparently
I have not seen a single scan citing the lasers from the Atlas turrets or gunships are made from hard light dust. If you have that please show it but thus far this is only an assumption because “Atlas is the father of hard-light dust” as you say.
Reasoning?
