• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violations Reports - 58

Status
Not open for further replies.

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
He/Him
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
164,976
71,705
Please report any rule violations in this thread. Notifying us of such incidents is highly appreciated.

Additionally, kindly report any sockpuppets that you come across.

Only report violations regarding the wiki rules. False reports due to personal vendettas are unacceptable.

Also, this thread should be for reporting actual rule-breaking, not every single little disagreement.

In cases of extreme vandalism or trolling, you can report the accounts at the VSTF wiki.

If blocked members create sockpuppet accounts to circumvent their block repetitively, or several are created at almost the same time, you may contact the Fandom Staff, to politely request permanent range IP blocks.

You can also find specific users with the Search Function by typing with the format: "User:Username"

Here is a useful page for discovering sockpuppet accounts: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Log/newusers

Notes:

All staff members, kindly follow and bookmark this thread.

Remember to inform members via their message walls if that you have reported them here, in case they have performed severe enough rule-violations to risk being blocked. However, this should only be used in uncertain cases, not if they have done something instantly ban worthy, or if their offenses are minor.

It is against the Fandom rules to upload any offensive images to the wiki, so in order to show screencapture evidence of extremely bad behaviour, you must use external sites, such as Gyazo or Imgur, in order to not get globally banned yourself by the higher-ups:

https://gyazo.com

https://imgur.com/

https://pasteboard.co

Do not derail the Rule Violation Threads with irrelevant nonsense or internal disputes. It is solely for making serious, warranted reports of violations of the Site, Discussio, and Editing Rules, and not for discussion or side comments. Such posts should preferably be removed by the staff, and if a member continues to derail after being repeatedly told to stop, this will result in a temporary ban.

Given the extreme levels of systematic harrassment towards this community, kindly remember to not share/post any evidence of malware or child abuse publicly in order to prevent unwillful distribution. Submit any evidence of child abuse and severe systematic threats to the police.

If something goes outside the jurisdiction of the VS Battles wiki bureaucrats, or even the global Fandom staff, you need to report it personally to the authorities.

Also, absolutely do not click on any random links from suspicious users. You could potentially access content that contains dangerous malware or illegal types of pornography, alternately tracks your IP address and location. If you are uncertain, please use this page to verify that the links are not dangerous.

However, do not feed the trolls by discussing their behaviour here, as they get excited and motivated by any form of attention. Strictly report them to the staff, who then block them and mass-delete their contributions.

If there are genuine serious problems with the behaviour of certain staff members, do not cause drama by extensively arguing about it here, but rather contact the Human Resources Group.
 
Continued from here: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/3513581
 
Reposting this from the last thread:

I'm being accused of trolling by Omimi in this thread: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/3520846#134

I appreciate it if someone could tell him to cool off.

I don't think this is serious enough to warrant a punishment, but I don't want this to be escalated any further and risk becoming something more serious.
 
Is somebody else in the staff willing to investigate the Damage/Omimi situation?
 
Okay. Thank you for the help.
 
I don't see how he's trolling, it's just a bad argument. Doesn't seem report worthy imo
 
Tbh, I was going to report Ted Ed for other reasons, and what he said here was pretty tame compared to what he said on other threads. I recall him being downright hostile on that one Dragon Ball thread. He did have a history of trolling on Mortal Kombat threads among others.

I was also in a discussion with another Admin, and he seems to agree that he might be Misaka Mikoto.
 
Well, without any evidence that it is Misaka, perhaps a warning to behave better would be enough for the moment?
 
I recall other staff members gave him multiple warnings, should he receive a temporary block? Or is a final warning good for now?
 
I'd say either a warning or a block, I'd prefer the latter however due to his very aggressive and foul tone. I do also recall him being warned in the past before which would merit a ban at that point.
 
I have blocked him for a month, hopefully he should learn from that.
 
Warned once, by Ant about him Constantly having issues with Matt. What does he do? Insult Matt and me again. Like you said Crimsion, please read the context. Also, I only acted semi condescending, don't try to paint me as the antagonist.
 
The Prince of Counters said:
Warned once, by Ant about him Constantly having issues with Matt. What does he do? Insult Matt and me again. Like you said Crimsion, please read the context. Also, I only acted semi condescending, don't try to paint me as the antagonist.
Unfortunate, the context here is also part of the stuff that ended up getting Matt himself reported to Fandom itself. That's important to note too. Hl3 has done nearly nothing wrong here. He's been slightly aggressive and that's all.
 
Antvasima was the one who gave him a final warning on this thread here and based on him being very hostile throughout the thread. And it wasn't just Antvasima but also Andy. And this wasn't the first time Antvasima gave him warnings as it appears he has had multiple on his message wall. His attitude was also pretty explosive. And he was constantly insulting Matt when he wasn't even on the thread. It's not a long term block, but it is justified.

Also, it doesn't matter how long ago the warning was, even old warnings count as history.
 
Well of course, but ultimately theres a difference between being rude and being warned for being extremely rude towards a staff member in the past and then just randomly insulting him out of the blue for no reason.
 
DarkDragonMedeus said:
Antvasima was the one who gave him a final warning on this thread here and based on him being very hostile throughout the thread. And this wasn't the first time Antvasima gave him warnings. And he was constantly insulting Matt when he wasn't even on the thread. It's not a long term block, but it is justified.
Can you link the actual comment at least? Because the thread itself is long and has many things that could be interpreted differently
 
"Only acted semi condescending"

"The sarcasm is pretty cute tho, I remember when I was an edgy 16 year old and watched "papa franku" too lol."

Also, if you think that's insulting you must have paper thin skin. All he said towards Matt was that "he can't take an L"

And, again, Hl3 didn't even get warned about this. It's bullshit.
 
Crimson, it's almost funny how you aren't even paying attention to what he said, for whatever reason.


No, your memory is just bad. Matt and you were the ones stonewalling, and the 2-A is so ******* blatant it's not even funny


Ah yes. The most potent of arguments, the Tone Argument. Thanks dad.


Honestly, please shut up. Literally nothing you have said about Nasuverse has been agreed to by anyone that knows what the **** they're talking about, and that includes you.



Don't leave things out next time to make it seem like he did nothing.
 
And yess DDM, older warnings count as history, but on a practical level time has also always been used as a mitigating factor on evaluation. A year is definitely a big mitigating factor.
 
The Prince of Counters said:
Crimson, it's almost funny how you aren't even paying attention to what he said, for whatever reason.


No, your memory is just bad. Matt and you were the ones stonewalling, and the 2-A is so ******* blatant it's not even funny


Ah yes. The most potent of arguments, the Tone Argument. Thanks dad.


Honestly, please shut up. Literally nothing you have said about Nasuverse has been agreed to by anyone that knows what the **** they're talking about, and that includes you.



Don't leave things out next time to make it seem like he did nothing.
Those are rude yes, but none of those are actual insults towards any party, besides poor memory.
 
The Katanagatari thread and final warning was only 5 days ago; quite recent. It's not "A year ago." And his response to the warning was also very rude. And insulting Matt out of the blue on a thread where he wasn't even there was also very uncalled for. And side note, actually we do take warnings into account no matter how long ago they were. At least that is what Sera said.

Anyway, I'd appreciate if you guys stopped bombarding this thread.
 
It's a bit absurd to take a warning from a year ago and just assume no change has been made or at least an attempt though.

People have bad days and threads can be overly irritating. It's kind of a fact on here but that's all I have to say on that
 
DarkDragonMedeus said:
The Katanagatari thread and final warning was only 5 days ago; quite recent. And his response to the warning was also very rude. And insulting Matt out of the blue on a thread where he wasn't even there was also very uncalled for. And side note, actually we do take warnings into account no matter how long ago they were.
I've already responded to all those points. You have yet to actually supply the actual warning, the supposed insults are not actually insulting anyone, and time has always been treated as a mitigating factor, so for practical purposes within this scenario it is basically a nonfactor
 
Arguments can get very heated, tis something that always happens on this site and something that always will happen on it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top