I see where I made the mistake: A two month ban was indeed served and carried out. Staff later proposed to change that to a 6 month ban, but while multiple staff agreed to that proposal, it never went anywhere.
Thank you for the info. Could not properly check the entire conversation at the time (and I had entirely forgotten the case)
I fully agree. A temporary ban is appropriate.Yes, and we should probably apply a temporary ban in the current case as well. It seems unfair and to set a very bad precedent otherwise.
I think both comments are bad, but you're right, the old comment telling someone to end themself is far worse. I do think saying someone should be killed is pretty bad though. Definitely a warning.
Could do. I would have believed it the common interpretation that a death threat requires it to be an actual threat, but as that isn't the case, a discussion about it could do.
A staff only thread in that case.
Apparently, it was applied under Ant's guidance before even thread was accepted. Because of this, I wasn't entirely sure of the proper course of action here that i could take. However, since the CRT seemed fairly straightforward, I ensured the "two staff votes" rule was fulfilled to avoid setting a bad precedent and told the user to apply any changes in future only after regular CRTs has been accepted by atleast 2 staffs with evaluating rights, tho the 24 hours rule must have slipped my mind during all that (oopsie moment).For some reason this was applied and closed
Michael Myers (Thorn Timeline) is now 9-B+
This calculation has been accepted. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Shattas/Michael_Myers_Violently_Smashes_A_Cabinet_Into_Many_Pieces So Michael Myers (Thorn Timeline) can now be upgraded to level 9-B+.vsbattles.com
But the bare minimum 24hr grace period didn't happen, it was only open for ~4 hours
vsbattles.fandom.com
Ant was sent the calc but not the CRT, without getting context he probably assumed that the CRT for the calc had already passed the grace period prerequisiteApparently, it was applied under Ant's guidance before even thread was accepted. Because of this, I wasn't entirely sure of the proper course of action here that i could take. However, since the CRT seemed fairly straightforward, I ensured the "two staff votes" rule was fulfilled to avoid setting a bad precedent and told the user to apply any changes in future only after regular CRTs has been accepted by atleast 2 staffs with evaluating rights, tho the 24 hours rule must have slipped my mind during all that (oopsie moment).
Shattas
Maybe. I have unlocked the thread, however; considering that the user is new and likely still learning the ropes, I don't think this situation warrants more than simple instruction and guidance (there is mistake on my part too anyways, messing up such a simple things as thread mod)
Apparently, it was applied under Ant's guidance before even thread was accepted. Because of this, I wasn't entirely sure of the proper course of action here that i could take. However, since the CRT seemed fairly straightforward, I ensured the "two staff votes" rule was fulfilled to avoid setting a bad precedent and told the user to apply any changes in future only after regular CRTs has been accepted by atleast 2 staffs with evaluating rights, tho the 24 hours rule must have slipped my mind during all that (oopsie moment).
Shattas
I didn't know about the 24-hour rule. You said I could add it, but never mind.Apparently, it was applied under Ant's guidance before even thread was accepted. Because of this, I wasn't entirely sure of the proper course of action here that i could take. However, since the CRT seemed fairly straightforward, I ensured the "two staff votes" rule was fulfilled to avoid setting a bad precedent and told the user to apply any changes in future only after regular CRTs has been accepted by atleast 2 staffs with evaluating rights, tho the 24 hours rule must have slipped my mind during all that (oopsie moment).
Shattas
I will assist him with the editing part tomorrow ig. In the meantime, I have left instructions on his profile, including links to the relevant rule pages he needs to keep in mind for the future.Btw: From what I recall, Shattas applied the revision in a very inaccurately structured manner, so they seem to need help with that part.
... Am I allowed to ask for a thread unban for the unpopular opinions thread...? Feel like rejoining + I think the stuff that led to the ban are unlikely to repeat themselves (also, new year, might as well hope to start it off positively).
It's been 6 months since they've been banned from the Unpopular Opinions thread due to an annoying amount of flooding and spamming, I think it's fine if we unban them from the thread, as long as they learn to either condense their messages into one post or utilize the spoiler feature that we have available.I am fine with banning them from that thread.
This is just comical. That's all I need to say.
Yeah, I shouldn't go insane with spamming either, I was just very very bored and timezones and Forum not being real-time were irritating, it was a one-off event (hopefully), should not happen again.
I am also fine with this.
