Not a violation, sounds like something for "All Purpose requests threads"hard necro.
Featherine (Umineko no naku koro ni) Vs Yogiri Takatou ( Instant Death)
Okay so this is a serious thread but with equal cosmology Speed equalized Both in character Cosmologies are equalized including hax potency and resistance Yogiri : Featherine :vsbattles.com
Yeah, but I have been told before to bring up necros here, even if they don't get a "violation" for it.
Seems pretty minor, but I left a message asking people not to derail too much.
Thank you, he did a umineko CRT without consulting the supports first, is that something important or just misscomunication?
That's not a violation, just something that works better if discussed first to do the best work.
oki thx
Well, if @KingTempest was continuously berated before that post that is a mitigating circumstance, but, as a staff member, please make an effort to set a good example of behaviour for our community.
Well he wasn't really. He was just debating someone who is, admittedly, very expressive on his stance; but he didnt insult his character here
Soooo... nothing happens?That said, given how ideologically opinionated I am, combined with my rather poor attention span, memory, and social skills, I am far from perfect myself, although I try to be helpful, polite, reasonable, and to not retaliate for recurrent harsh insults from our community members.
Staff reports aren't to be handled in RvR, thats an HR thing but maybe nothing outside of a warning since KT isn't in and out of RVR and just getting heated in very expressive debate happens so just saying to chill and not let it happen again should suffice
Understood, my apologies
I've stepped in and called out the behaviour. We'll see both how they respond and just how far over the line staff think that comment was.
How about we don't ignore the context? Recon1511 has been harassing me for a while now. I never even talk to him first. Not too long ago, he literally sent me a death threat (and to others as well in the past) because I said something he didn't like. He managed to avoid a ban because he claimed it was "just a joke" even though it was obviously not. The guy hates me for some reason even though I never did anything to him. The fact that he STILL attacks me for no reason is proof his previous death threats were not a joke, and he genuinely meant it.
Can you provide that death threat or bring up where it was reported? We do take those very seriously.How about we don't ignore the context? Recon1511 has been harassing me for a while now. I never even talk to him first. Not too long ago, he literally sent me a death threat (and to others as well in the past) because I said something he didn't like. He managed to avoid a ban because he claimed it was "just a joke" even though it was obviously not. The guy hates me for some reason even though I never did anything to him. The fact that he STILL attacks me for no reason is proof his previous death threats were not a joke, and he genuinely meant it.
While Recon was kind of baiting on the "Hope this means you'll leave the thread," nothing excuses a response on that level. User in question was also previously banned for encouraging suicide, which we really should be considered pretty damn generous for not having it be permanent. Still, comments about "Sucking the staff's dick" is not appropriate language. DBZ is correct that Recon saying "You should have been killed" a while back was also problematic.
Sure, here it is.
I'm horrible because I'm standing up to someone who said I should be killed and harasses me for no reason? The first time he said I should be killed, I didn't even insult him or say anything back to him. But he managed to evade a ban and now he's back to insulting me for no reason. So I finally stand up for myself (since the staff never want to punish this guy) and now I'm horrible? Yeah, great logic.
Yes, I remember these. I actually thought at the time it was serious, but technically not a threat per se.Sure, here it is.
Here are some more death threats he sent in the past. And to nobody's surprise, he never gets punished because the staff like him and he always claims it was "just a joke".
It's relevant because Recon1511 continues to harass me even after he apologized to me for issuing the previous death threats. This shows that he did not learn from his behavior and he genuinely dislikes me. I'm supposed to just sit there and let him walk all over me?
This might be a necessity. Let's see what others think.
Do you not understand? I never engage with Recon first. He is the one who always starts arguments with me. I have no clue why. I've barely interacted with him in the past, but one day he just woke up and decided to wage war against me. Don't put us on the same level.
Please don't snap at Reiner like that. We're just trying to figure this out and resolve it as well as we can.
Understood. I'm just a bit frustrated because Recon1511 seems to get WAY more leniency than anyone else who gets reported. He has posted multiple comments about how people should be KILLED in gruesome detail, yet he gets away with it because he claims it was just a joke. I think it's pretty clear that he holds genuine animosity to some of the people he sends death threats to.
It wasn't you standing up that was wrong, it was the way you said it. Plus, Random Helper said it was more so an insensitive joke rather than a legit threat. But still grossly inappropriate and I understand why you were mad at him. Nor was his more recent post quite that level. You could have just either reported him or politely request him to not quote you; the reaction just now was a very overblown way to handle it.
That's literally what I did the first time when Recon said I should be murdered. And guess what? Nothing happened. He wasn't banned, he was just "warned." And now he's harassing me again for no reason.
If he ever says the same thing again, he will be banned harshly. That much I could guarantee, and I do think he should be getting some form of punishment for baiting. Though Helper agreed that the bare minimum is staff will set you two up so you will not see each other's comments. But I want to hear thoughts from other staff members before delivering a harsher verdict.
I want him banned to be honest. This is such a reasonable request, but the staff seem hellbent on protecting Recon for some odd reason. If anyone else said the things he regularly says, they would've been banned ages ago.
We are not okay with it. I think what Recon said was disgusting. It's just debatable whether it's a threat, a call to action, or something less serious.
If you're not okay with it, ban him. It's as simple as that. Anything less than a ban implies you are okay with it. He clearly has not changed. He only acts remorseful when he's afraid he'll be banned. Then he goes back to insulting and baiting.
Less a ban doesn't mean they are okay, in fact an entire staff thread was made to handle your situation. I don't see any malicious reasons for staffs actively supporting Recon over any other members here.
This is basically what I had in mind. In any case, Recon's previous case has already been judged and concluded, it was considered ambiguous, as while it could be seen as a serious threat, it could also have just been as a dark humor. We have warned him, and he promised not to do this again which he didn't and we are actively working towards the rule that restricts our member from using such wording for anyone, even if as a joke. Even if he dislikes someone doesn't mean he seriously wishes harm to them.
