Brother it was a mistake mod or not the man is human, if you want a more accurate translation you don't blow up and cause a scene here, you go make a request with the scan to the translation request thread. They've already apologized for the mistake and changed it long ago please stop throwing accusations
vsbattles.fandom.com
Left him a warning and reverted it.World of Darkness
For detailed information about this franchise, please visit The White Wolf Wiki World of Darkness is a multimedia franchise centered around a series of tabletop roleplaying games, created in 1991 and initially owned by White Wolf Publishing, passed on to CCP Games in 2006, and to Paradox...
This random guy keeps adding some Imam onto the WoD page, this isn't a WoD character
I think my previous message already answers this question... Since they've been moved to blog posts there's no need for them to remain as pages, and as pages they don't really follow our rules so... what else could be done besides deleting them?
Ah... I forgot the two threads were different tbh xD
vsbattles.fandom.com
A warning should suffice, considering it's his first violation. He also just seemed clueless and also misinterpret Qawsedf's stance. I will tag him and hear out what he have to say first tho @Jason_Voorhees1986
To be honest, I have to admit that I'm not entirely familiar with this wiki's rules. I just thought it would be a good idea to place Qawsedf in a special category called "somewhat agree" since he participated in a significant portion of the content revision, particularly regarding the High 1-A tier. Additionally, I wanted to clarify which tier scaling he found reasonable so that others seeing his approval would understand that he agreed with at least part of the content revision but wasn't convinced about the High 1-A+ aspect. However, after the tension that occurred yesterday, I completely removed it.
Well then, if there wasn't any malicious intent, I don't think any action needs to be taken for mere cluelessness, considering it's your first violation too. So next time, just make sure to count an agreement or disagreement only if it is clearly stated, rather than basing it on an unclear interpretation.
Of course.
Guys permit me to leave this on here,
Honestly many such cases, it's honestly why we should hold off on verses that need translating, because people are inherently biased (naturally, because we all want to see our favs succeed, including myself) and with only their word to go on what it says, it's ripe for manipulation and misinformation.
Yes and also that some were accepted and already applied.
Two of them were applied and the reason the others were not applied was because not all the revisions were finished so no.
It's not really a rule violation. Just agree to disagree and move on rather than going back and forth.
He doesn’t seem to be stonewalling, just responding to @Ednaxel2 counter-arguments, just as Ednaxel is replying to his, creating a back-and-forth situation. I’d suggest that both of them write a single post summarizing their arguments, agree to disagree, and let the staff decide.Well, excessive stonewalling is technically a rule-violation. Maybe an instruction warning message would be warranted?
I would also like to add translation of a RAW scan by Astral that he did here in this thread, I scrolled through only qawsed final judgement randomly and first thing I got is misleading mistranslation by Astral.
Your Chatgpt says "So unless the context is literally about the timeline being affected directly, "in that timeline" is the right way to phrase it." In this context, the universe has ended. I'm not a translator, but just saying.
Just going to clarify that something did indeed happen to that timeline.as the universe itself was destroyed. What happened IN that timeline was just an attack powerful enough to destroy it.
That's exactly what Qawsed was asking, whether the timeline was actually destroyed or not, but what was sent to him is scan that itself was misleading by implying "the entire timeline was destroyed" due to the use of 'to'. If there were scans or context to imply that entire timeline was destroyed then he should have sent that, a misleading human edited translation isn't proper evidence or a valid scan to begin with. Whether or not there's actual evidence or a scan showing the timeline being destroyed is a separate matter and should have been presented in that thread. Presenting a scan about the timeline being destroyed with a dishonest mistranslation doesn’t prove anything.
Again. What Qawsedf asked for is the scan that "entire timeline was destroyed". He was served with misleading translation. Destroying Universe doesn't mean Timeline here but either way separate matter. The scan in demand should have been clear on its own rather than forced.
