even if they were, he was asked prior to stop making comments
I will be as honest as I can, Tdjwo is consistently causing trouble in threads he doesn't agree with, derailing them, providing no insight into why he disagrees, I first noticed it here, where he openly admitted to derailing! He is now seen to be consistently in the rvt where he shows similar behavior, so I'll say that I believe a ban is needed here, we can't just let him keep going on with this behaviour.Reporting @Tdjwo and @KingNanaya for stonewalling this thread for an entire page and an a half, even after being repeatedly told to stop by @IdiosyncraticLawyer and I.
Tier 0 Swirl of the Root Retake
This is a false mistranslation. Nowhere in the raw scans does it even remotely imply that the Counter Force takes the shape of the Akashic records. @Wankbreaker I might be missing something, since I only looked at part of it and aren't familiar with the verse at all, but this passes the sniff...vsbattles.com
The thread you linked was indeed a derailing comment but that was intentional because it was a topic already discussed on multiple occasions already. In fact, almost everyone seemed to agree that the thread you made then was purely unnecessary at that time.
You mean like how you were told by @Deagonx to stop posting, and how you continued to do so over the course of 2 months? And when called out on this fact, you ignored the rules that stated that staff members can remove the permissions to comment, if they were given that permission by staff? Or how @IdiosyncraticLawyer threatened to get staff members to delete @Tdjwo comment that originally called this fact out? We called out your poor behavior. I can admit that on my side, I was being pretty antagonistic while doing so. I could have handled myself better.
I'd be fine with either one.
Bureaucrats can give indefinite permission to comment. You were told this quite a few times. Plus:
I do not think that we have strict set rules regarding this issue, but it does not exactly seem to be an image helper or translation helper area of input, unless they have something genuinely important to share.
Because you two were stonewalling the thread multiple times.
Did you get permission to even comment on the first place? Also, Wankbreaker got permission by Antvasima to make a few posts at that time so I'd rather be on the side that Deagon overlooked that.
I'm aware. And I cited the rules to you.
Conflicts with what I was previously aware of, which was this:
not what was happening at all.
You went that route.
He got permission to comment, as long as the comments were constructive. I would hardly call stonewalling for over a page constructive.
Which one? If you're referring to my post to Deagon, then yes, I was given perms by Antvasima
I don’t wanna swing my position around, but a TL helper is hardly a “regular member”, don’t you think?
Lawyer told you to stop, and you repeated the same thing over and over.
In what scenario?
It's kind of ironic, you were talking about wankbreaker not having permission to post in that thread yet you were posting 10x more than him. You were told by idio to stop commenting countless times yet you kept going, you didn't have permission to comment in that thread yet you commented, countless times, derailing the thread further with each comment.
While that is the case, Ant said that these members are free to comment if it is important, I quoted the exact message above.
This was on the first occasion I asked. I asked again after that, and there was no mention of a “few” posts.
Okay. I suppose that you can probably make some posts there then.
No, it was to Deagon. Tdjwo started off saying:
He only responded to Deagon, Not you.
Some of the points he quoted weren’t from Deagon at all, but me.
^ here is what I was quoting.I do not think that we have strict set rules regarding this issue, but it does not exactly seem to be an image helper or translation helper area of input, unless they have something genuinely important to share.
Ant said he wasn't certain of the rules in that area, luckily I am.
Are you linking the wrong thing? Because that's exactly the instance I was talking about.
Ant asks you which points you want to bring up
You vaguely allude to them
Ant says you can make some posts about them
Alright, I’ll leave it at that then.
There was another instance where he specifically said “a few”, I thought you were referring to that.
Sorry. I was too busy to respond on time.
You are right. But I think Wank should be punished as well because he clearly was in the wrong as well.
Nevermind, it was fixed
Well don't know whom he was refering. Is it to me or @Dog3352 or someone else. Because too many comments were piling up. But this is going extreme. Not to mention it's just derailing without giving any productive input.
